1 / 13

Cognitive Processes PSY 334

Cognitive Processes PSY 334. Chapter 10 – Reasoning & Decision-Making August 19, 2003. Incubation Effects. Some kinds of problems tend to benefit from interruption ( incubation ). 55% without break, 64% 1 hr, 85% 4 hr. Delay may disrupt set effects.

reina
Download Presentation

Cognitive Processes PSY 334

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cognitive ProcessesPSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning & Decision-Making August 19, 2003

  2. Incubation Effects • Some kinds of problems tend to benefit from interruption (incubation). • 55% without break, 64% 1 hr, 85% 4 hr. • Delay may disrupt set effects. • Problems depending on a set of steps or procedures do not benefit from interruption. • Subjects forget their plan and must review what was previously done.

  3. Insight • There is no magical “aha” moment where everything falls into place, even though it feels that way. • People let go of poor ways of solving the problem during incubation. • Subjects do not know when they are close to a solution, so it seems like insight – but they were working all along.

  4. Research on Logic • Logic – a subdiscipline of philosophy and mathematics that formally specifies what it means for an argument to be correct. • Human deviations from logic were thought to be malfunctions of the mind. • Recent comparisons of human thinking show that logic is not an appropriate prescriptive norm.

  5. Two Kinds of Reasoning • Reasoning – the process of inferring new knowledge from what we already know. • Deductive reasoning – conclusions follow with certainty from their premises. • Reasoning from the general to the specific. • Inductive reasoning – conclusions are probable rather than certain. • Reasoning from the specific to the general. • Probabilistic – based on likelihoods.

  6. Conditionals • If-then statements. • Antecedent – the “if” part. • Consequent – the “then” part. • Rules of inferences using conditionals: • Modus ponens -- If A then B, A, conclude B • Modus tollens – If A then B, not-B, conclude not-A • Notation: negation, implication, therefore.

  7. Logical Fallacies • Denial of the antecedent: • If P then Q, not-P, conclude not-Q • If P then Q, not-P, conclude Q • Affirmation of the consequent: • If P then Q, Q, conclude P • If P then Q, Q, conclude not-P • Subjects seem to interpret the conditional as a biconditional – if means “if and only if”

  8. How People Reason • People may be reasoning in terms of conditional probabilities. • Conditional probabilities can be found that correspond to acceptance rates for fallacies. • Wason selection task – can be explained in terms of probabilities. • Also explained by a permission schema

  9. Quantifiers • Categorical syllogism – analyzes propositions with quantifiers “all,” “no,” and “some.” • Fallacies: • Some A’s are B’s • Some B’s are C’s • Conclude: Some A’s are C’s • Substitute women for A, lawyers for B, men for C to see what is wrong.

  10. Atmosphere Hypothesis • People commit fallacies because they tend to accept conclusions with the same quantifiers as the premises. • No A’s are B’s • All B’s are C’s • Conclude No A’s are C’s. • The logical terms (some, all, no, not) create an atmosphere that predisposes acceptance of the same terms.

  11. Two Forms • People tend to accept a positive conclusion to positive premises, negative conclusion to negative premises. • Mixed premises lead to negative conclusions. • People tend to accept universal conclusions from universal premises (all, no), particular conclusions from particular premises (some, some not).

  12. Limitations • Atmosphere hypothesis describes what people do, but doesn’t explain why. • People violate predictions of the atmosphere hypothesis. • More likely to accept a syllogism if it contains a chain leading from A to C. • People should accept a syllogism with two negative premises, but correctly reject it.

  13. Process Explanations • People construct a mental model to think concretely about the situation. • Correct conclusions depend upon choosing the correct mental model. • Errors occur because people overlook possible explanations of the premises: • All the squares are striped • Some striped objects have bold borders. • Some of the squares have bold borders.

More Related