1 / 20

Yves Martin Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas

ITPA – CDBM H-mode threshold database Threshold power recommended scaling October 200 5 - St-Petersb urg. Yves Martin Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Association Euratom - Confédération Suisse Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) CH - 1015 Lausanne, S witzerland.

reece
Download Presentation

Yves Martin Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ITPA – CDBMH-mode threshold databaseThreshold power recommended scalingOctober 2005 - St-Petersburg Yves Martin Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Association Euratom - Confédération Suisse Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) CH - 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

  2. Discussion plan • History • Scalings • Parameters, data selection, new data • Predictions • Summary • Questions • General (one single scaling ...) • Data selection • Variable selection • Method selection

  3. NF Paper 1996 - F.Ryter • Tokamaks: Alcator C-Mod, ASDEX, ASDEX Upgrade, Compass-D, DIII-D, JET, JFT-2M, JT-60U, PBX-M • Nb of Samples: 3800

  4. IAEA 1996 - T.Takizuka • Tokamaks: Alcator C-Mod, ASDEX, ASDEX Upgrade, Compass-D, DIII-D, JET, JFT-2M, JT-60U, PBX-M, TCV • Nb of Samples: 3860

  5. PPCF 1998 - E.Righi • Tokamaks: Alcator C-Mod, ASDEX, ASDEX Upgrade, Compass-D, DIII-D, JET, JFT-2M, JT-60U, PBX-M, TCV • Nb of Samples: 3860

  6. PPCF 1998 - E.Righi - II • Analysis with edge parameters (nea & Tea) • => Tea for ITER (4.75keV +/- 1.9)

  7. PPCF 2000 - J.A.Snipes • Tokamaks: Alcator C-Mod, ASDEX, ASDEX Upgrade, Compass, DIII-D, JET, JFT-2M, JT-60U, PBX-M, TCV • Nb of Samples: 6800 • Analysis of edge parameters => Te(90)

  8. PPCF 2002 - F.Ryter • Tokamaks: Alcator C-Mod, ASDEX, ASDEX Upgrade, Compass, DIII-D, JET, JFT-2M, JT-60U, PBX-M, TCV • Nb of Samples: 6800

  9. PPCF 2004 - T.Takizuka • Tokamaks: Alcator C-Mod, ASDEX, ASDEX Upgrade, Compass, DIII-D, JET, JFT-2M, JT-60U, MAST, NSTX, PBX-M, TCV, TUMAN-3M • Nb of Samples: ~7600 • Pth = 0.072 * n200.7 *|Bout|0.7 * S0.9 * (Zeff/2)0.7 * F(A)g

  10. IAEA 2004 - Y.Martin • Tokamaks: Alcator C-Mod, ASDEX, ASDEX Upgrade, Compass, DIII-D, JET, JFT-2M, JT-60U, MAST, NSTX, PBX-M, TCV, TUMAN-3M • Nb of Samples: 7673

  11. IAEA 2003 - D.McDonald • Tokamaks: Alcator C-Mod, ASDEX, ASDEX Upgrade, Compass, DIII-D, JET, JFT-2M, JT-60U, MAST, NSTX, PBX-M, TCV, TUMAN-3M • Nb of Samples: 7673

  12. Tokamak Physics Basis • 2 Scalings included in TPB • From F.Ryter PPCF 2002: Pth = 0.042 * n200.73 *BT0.74 * S0.98 • Is based on • high density (to remove possible perturbation from turning point) • reduced tokamak list • normalisation of know dependences on individual tokamaks • Chosen because of its low RMS: 21.4% • From T.Takizuka, PPCF 2004 Pth = 0.072 * n200.7 *|Bout|0.7 * S0.9 * (Zeff/2)0.7 * F(A)g • Inlcudes more physics (Zeff, Bout)

  13. Summary of scalings - Threshold power Pthr ITER 8.1m [MW] Pthr ITER 6.2m [MW] 1996 2005

  14. Summary of scalings - coefficients

  15. Questions - general • Data was collected, new data added. • Database was analysed, different directions explored. • Many scalings were evaluated. • Questions: • Why 2 scalings in TPB? • Why not that one, with all tokamaks, which predicts lower threshold for ITER ? • Is it possible to nominate one scaling as THE reference scaling? • Which one ?

  16. Questions - Data selection • Selections used/proposed so far: • Standard data set (e.g. IAEA2004) • Increase/decrease strength of SELDB constraints (n, q95, ...) • Remove small tokamaks (ASDEX, COMPASS, TCV) • Remove spherical tokamaks • Remove electron heating • Select only NBI • Select/reject transition types (LDLDLD, ...) • Select/reject divertor types (open / close div., specific div.) • Select/reject plasma shapes (PBX-M: DND) • ... => Choice criteria ?

  17. Questions - Variable selection • Variables used so far: • n, B, Bout, a, R, Rmm, S, e, k, d, Zeff, • Variables evaluated so far: • ne90, Te90 • (a & R) or S • B or Bout • R or Rmm • ... => Choice criteria ?

  18. Questions - Method selection • Methods used so far • OLS • EVOR • ML • ... discriminant analysis • Dimensionally correct scalings

  19. Tools • Should we use • Other ways to present predictions • Confidence intervals for power coefficients • Threshold power with better description of confidence intervals • Other tools to predict ITER threshold power • Analysis of sensitivity on coefficients

  20. Conclusion • We decided to use • Data set: _______________________________ • Variable set: _______________________________ • Method: _______________________________ • Tools: _______________________________ • Because: _______________________________ • _______________________________ • _______________________________ • _______________________________

More Related