Bio Jamie M. Grooms
80 likes | 255 Views
Bio Jamie M. Grooms. B.S. Biology from Old Dominion University Start-Up Experience Beginning In 1984 Navigated Corporate World through Manufacturing and Product Development First CEO role 1995 UFTB, inc (Became RTIX) Partner of Synogen CEO of AxoGen, (AXGN)
Bio Jamie M. Grooms
E N D
Presentation Transcript
BioJamie M. Grooms • B.S. Biology from Old Dominion University • Start-Up Experience Beginning In 1984 • Navigated Corporate World through Manufacturing and Product Development • First CEO role 1995 UFTB, inc (Became RTIX) • Partner of Synogen • CEO of AxoGen, (AXGN) • CEO, The Florida Institute for the Commercialization of Public Research
Avance® Increases Graft Length Neubauer et al, 2007, Experimental Neurology – 207, 163-170 • Enhanced axon regeneration • Axons through entire 4 cm graftand were myelinated vs. sparse axons in controls • Tight organized bundles with multiple axons • Achieved functional recovery • 8 of 9 had positive pinch test response vs. none in controls 40mm Ch treated vs. Vehicle treated acellular grafts in rat sciatic nerve model [n=9), 12 weeks recovery] Distal host; tibial n. 3mm distal to distal coaptation; data (+/- SE) of 9 nerves for each
What We KnowSciatic Rat Model • Wow Factor: 4cm Bridge with Recovery • Restored Sensory Sensation • Axons Grew through the full length of the Graft • Axons were Myelinated • Axons leveraged the 3-D Architecture • ChABC grafts performed better than Controls
What We Need to KnowSciatic Rat Model • The complete process: Including Recovery Protocol, The implant needs to be de-cellularized to commercial viability • Process Parameters: Minimum and Maximum for exposure times and concentration • Bio-Activity of ChABC • Alternate Vendors • ChABC implants vs. Gold Standard • Will Motor Function be Restored • Characterization of Final Product
How to Proceed • Sub-Contract • Pros • Control Costs • Quicker Start • Cons • Technology Transfer Risk • Lose of Project Control Failure Law Suite Time • Build Infrastructure • Pros • Control of Development • Delay Start • Cons • Greater Facility Cost • Greater Employee Cost
Avance® Technology Compares Favorably with Autograft Muir et al, 2007, ASSH Annual Meeting; Manuscript in Process Studied functional assessments measured in a composite index (sensory and motor) Shows promise as a better than autograft alternative “Decellularized, chondroitinase-treated, sterile nerve grafts provide superior results to live isografts and may represent a major breakthrough for clinical nerve repair.” Processed Allograft Isograft 33% Improvement 10mm AxoGen processed grafts (n=6) vs. Isograft (n=6) in rat sciatic nerve graft model; 24 weeks recovery
What Do We KnowSciatic Rat Model • The complete process • Process Parameters • Bio-Activity of ChABC • Alternate Vendors • ChABC implants vs. Gold Standard • Characterization of Final Product for Rats and the Pre-Clinical Studies