1 / 13

Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data

Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data. Lecture 17 Redistributive Effect of Health Finance. Contributions to health finance may redistribute disposable income. Can occur when payments compulsory and independent of utilisation

rdarrell
Download Presentation

Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data Lecture 17 Redistributive Effect of Health Finance “Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data” Owen O’Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer, Adam Wagstaff and Magnus Lindelow, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2008, www.worldbank.org/analyzinghealthequity

  2. Contributions to health finance may redistribute disposable income • Can occur when payments compulsory and independent of utilisation • Societal (/policy) interest may stem from concern for distribution of income • Redistribution can be vertical – payments disproportionately related to ability to pay (ATP) (e.g. progressive) • But can also derive from horizontal inequity – unequal payments at equal ATP “Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data” Owen O’Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer, Adam Wagstaff and Magnus Lindelow, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2008, www.worldbank.org/analyzinghealthequity

  3. Measurement of redistributive effect (RE) • Compare inequality in pre-payment incomes with inequality in post-payment incomes • Measure inequality by the Gini coefficient (G) • Then • where GX is gross of contributions to health finance and GX-P is net of contributions “Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data” Owen O’Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer, Adam Wagstaff and Magnus Lindelow, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2008, www.worldbank.org/analyzinghealthequity

  4. Decomposition of redistributive effect • RE can be decomposed into: • Vertical redistribution (V) • Horizontal inequity (H) • Reranking (R) • Reranking refers to changes in individuals’ positions in the income distribution due to differential contributions to health finance • RE = V-H-R (Aronson et al, 1994) • Vertical redistribution (progressivity) contributes positively to redistribution and is offset by horizontal inequity and reranking • To make the decomposition, one must define individuals within certain intervals of pre-payment income as ‘equals’ and subsequently group them accordingly “Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data” Owen O’Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer, Adam Wagstaff and Magnus Lindelow, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2008, www.worldbank.org/analyzinghealthequity

  5. Vertical redistribution (V) • V is the redistribution that would arise if there were no horizontal inequity • V = GX-G0, where G0 is the between groups (of equals) Gini for post-payment incomes • Then V = [g/(1-g)]KE • where g is average tax rate and • KE is the Kakwani index of payments that would arise if there were horizontal equity ; KE = C0 – GX, where C0is the between-groups concentration index for payments • Redistribution generated by a given degree of progressivity (KE) is ‘scaled’ by the size of the tax burden (g) “Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data” Owen O’Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer, Adam Wagstaff and Magnus Lindelow, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2008, www.worldbank.org/analyzinghealthequity

  6. Progressive tax & differential treatment • Concavity indicates progressivity • Progressivity implies redistribution • But differential treatment increases post-tax inequality and reduces RE • RE = [g/(1-g)]KE - D = V - D D is the offsetting effect due to differential treatment

  7. Progressive tax with horizontal inequity (H) & reranking • Fans arise because of differential treatment (H) • Fan overlap results in reranking • H can occur without reranking — but not vice versa • Both H and reranking reduce the RE (increase post-payment inequality) “Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data” Owen O’Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer, Adam Wagstaff and Magnus Lindelow, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2008, www.worldbank.org/analyzinghealthequity

  8. Measurement of Horizontal Inequity (H) • H is weighted sum of group (j) specific post-payment Gini coefficients • where weights are the product of the group’s population share and its post-payment income share • H must be non-negative – it increases post-payment inequality and reduces redistributive effect (see previous dgms.) “Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data” Owen O’Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer, Adam Wagstaff and Magnus Lindelow, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2008, www.worldbank.org/analyzinghealthequity

  9. Measurement of reranking • R = GX-P-CX-P, • where CX-P is a concentration index for post-payment incomes obtained by ranking first by pre-payment income and then, within each group of pre-payment ‘equals’, by post-payment income • R cannot be negative since the Lorenz curve for post-payment income cannot lie below the concentration curve • R is zero if the rankings by pre and post payment incomes coincide – there is no reranking • So, reranking increases inequality and reduces redistributive effect “Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data” Owen O’Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer, Adam Wagstaff and Magnus Lindelow, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2008, www.worldbank.org/analyzinghealthequity

  10. Feasibility of the decomposition • Decomposition of RE into V, H and R requires defining intervals of pre-payment income as ‘equals’ • The relative magnitudes of H and R depend on the intervals chosen, which are somewhat arbitrary • So magnitude of V relative to RE (H+R) is most interesting aspect of decomposition “Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data” Owen O’Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer, Adam Wagstaff and Magnus Lindelow, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2008, www.worldbank.org/analyzinghealthequity

  11. Redistributive Effect of Public Finance of Health Care in the Netherlands, UK & US “Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data” Owen O’Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer, Adam Wagstaff and Magnus Lindelow, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2008, www.worldbank.org/analyzinghealthequity

  12. RE from all taxes going into health care “Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data” Owen O’Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer, Adam Wagstaff and Magnus Lindelow, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2008, www.worldbank.org/analyzinghealthequity

  13. RE of all social health insurance “Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data” Owen O’Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer, Adam Wagstaff and Magnus Lindelow, The World Bank, Washington DC, 2008, www.worldbank.org/analyzinghealthequity

More Related