1 / 22

Work package 5 Cost effectiveness

SEDENTEXCT consortium meeting Malmö, January 2010. Work package 5 Cost effectiveness. Participant responsible MAHOD Participants contributing CLUJ KUL UNIMAN VU. Overall objective of WP 5.

Download Presentation

Work package 5 Cost effectiveness

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SEDENTEXCT consortium meeting Malmö, January 2010 Work package 5 Cost effectiveness Participant responsible MAHOD Participants contributing CLUJ KUL UNIMAN VU

  2. Overall objective of WP 5 To analyse the cost-effectiveness of CBCT in different clinical situations, health care contexts and countries

  3. Specific objectives • To analyse the costs of CBCT examinations in terms of radiation dosage and monetary terms • To analyse additional diagnostic information • To analyse additional therapeutical information • To calculate costs and efficacy for different clinical situations i.e the gain of CBCT in terms of efficacy

  4. Clinical situations agreed on Retained maxillary canines Lower wisdom teeth Preoperative implants Temporomandibular joints

  5. Conventional method New method Conventional method New method

  6. COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF CONSEQUENCES COST ANALYSIS

  7. D5.1 Analysis of time and cost spent on the ”key” CBCT examination in all participating radiology departments – M5.2, M 18 • Valuation of cost per image of intraoral and panoraminc radiographs and volumes of CBCT in EURO. • Intra-oral Panoramic CBCT • Malmö 4,02 16,12 105,42 • Cluj 2,42 3,79 36,44 • Leuven 1,26 1,45 24,28 • Vilnius 1,95 2,25 68,26 • Average 2,41 5,90 58,6 Worked on further…..

  8. Objectives for year 2

  9. Problems identified: • recruitment of patients • patients examined with only one radiographic method • (CBCT) in some centres • transfer of images to MAHOD

  10. Problem solving: • continuous recruitment of patients in MAHOD • UNIMAN entering clinical cases into WP5

  11. ANALYSIS OF CONSEQUENCES Influence on the confidence of the radiologist – diagnostic thinking efficacy (M5.4) Influence on the confidence of the clinician in treatment decision (M5.5) Influence on the treatment Consequences for the patient

  12. Problems identified: • recruitment of patients • patients examined with only one radiographic method • (CBCT) in some centres • transfer of images to MAHOD

  13. Plans for Month 24 - 36 Month 32 Month 26 Month 27 Month 30 M 5.5 Retained canines M 5.4 Retained canines and wisdom teeth M 5.5 Wisdom teeth and Implant patients M 5.7 and 5.8 Completion of WP5 work M 5.6 Avalaibility of WP2 dosimetry data for WP5 work D5.2 Completion of cost analysis of CBCT D5.2, M26 Completion of cost analysis of CBCT D5.3, M36 Analysis and calculations of cost-effectiveess completed

More Related