1 / 23

Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments. R.C. Sharma 1 , A.I. Morgounov 2 , H.J. Braun 2 , B. Akin 2 , M. Keser 1 , D. Bedoshvili 1,2 , A. Bagci 3 , M. van Ginkel 1 , A. Yahyaoui 1 , S. Rajaram 1. 1 ICARDA; 2 CIMMYT; 3 Celcuk Univ., Turkey.

rasha
Download Presentation

Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments R.C. Sharma1, A.I. Morgounov2, H.J. Braun2, B. Akin2, M. Keser1, D. Bedoshvili1,2, A. Bagci3, M. van Ginkel1, A. Yahyaoui1, S. Rajaram1 1ICARDA; 2CIMMYT; 3Celcuk Univ., Turkey

  2. Abbreviations • IWWIP : International Winter Wheat Improvement Program • IWWYT : International Winter Wheat Yield Trial • SA : Semi-arid • IR : Irrigated • CWANA: Central and West Asia and North Africa

  3. International Winter Wheat Program (IWWIP) Cooperative winter wheat breeding program: Ministry of Agric. and Rural Affairs, Turkey CIMMYT ICARDA

  4. 3.9 Mha 0.6 Mha 0.8 Mha 6.5 Mha 0.4 Mha 4.0 Mha

  5. Objectives • Compare grain yield of wheat genotypes targeted to irrigated and semi-arid environments in the IWWIP • Examine high yielding wheat genotypes under low and high productive environments for their specific and broad adaptation

  6. Materials and Methods • IWWYT – SA • IWWYT – IR • Comparison of grain yield levels of genotypes in IWWYT-SA and IWWYT-IR evaluated under similar management conditions • Comparison of grain yield levels of genotypes in IWWYT-SA tested under low and high productive environments

  7. Research Stations in Turkey contributing to the Turkey – CIMMYT – ICARDA International Winter Wheat Improvement Program Samsun Edirne Erzurum Adapazari Ankara Eskisehir Diyarbakir Izmir Konya Adana Aleppo SW WW

  8. IWWIP framework in Turkey: F4 and Head Rows F3 F2 Ankara F1 Eskisehir F4,HR Izmir Aleppo SW WW

  9. IWWIP framework : PYT Samsun Edirne PYT Erzurum Adapazari PYT Ankara PYT Eskisehir Diyarbakir F4,HR Izmir PYT PYT Konya Adana Aleppo SW WW

  10. IWWIP framework : Yield Trials Tashkent YT&AYT 2010 YT&AYT YT&AYT YT&AYT Samsun Edirne Erzurum Adapazari YT&AYT Ankara YT&AYT Eskisehir Diyarbakir Izmir PYT YT&AYT Konya Aleppo Adana

  11. IWWIP framework in Turkey: seed multiplication for international distribution W. Europe Russia & E. Europe Central Asia USA & S. America Edirne China Konya Aleppo WANA SW WW

  12. Breeding methodologyIWWIP framework in Turkey and germplasm movement

  13. Study 1: IWWYT-SA vs. IWWYT-IR • Mean grain yield (t/ha) under similar management IWWYT-SA IWWYT-IR Portugal-07 5.31 5.54 Armenia-08 3.25 3.33 Russia-08 6.16 5.47 Serbia-08 8.01 8.90 Uzbekistan-08 5.32 4.89 Uzbekistan-09 4.62 5.55

  14. Study 1: IWWYT-SA vs. IWWYT-IR • Highest grain yield (t/ha) under similar management • IWWYT-SA IWWYT-IR • Portugal-07 7.49 7.52 (0%) • Armenia-08 4.20 4.75 (+12%) • Russia-08 8.13 7.53 (-8%) • Serbia-08 9.96 10.16 (+2%) • Uzbekistan-08 6.55 6.05 (-8%) • Uzbekistan-09 6.43 6.75 (+5%)

  15. Performance of wheat lines under irrigated management in Uzbekistan - 2009 † Values within a column followed by different letters significantly at P =0.05 based on DMRT

  16. Study 2: Highest yielding genotypes in the 7th IWWYT-SA under low and high productive environments, 2005

  17. Study 2: Highest yielding genotypes in the 8th IWWYT-SA under low and high productive environments, 2006

  18. Study 2: Highest yielding genotypes in the 9th IWWYT-SA under low and high productive environments, 2007

  19. Study 2: Highest yielding genotypes in the 10th IWWYT-SA under low and high productive environments, 2008

  20. Conclusions Grain yield of highest yielding genotypes in IWWYT-IR and IWWYT-SA are comparable under irrigated management Certain genotypes developed for dryland also possess yield potential that could efficiently utilize management practices for irrigated management In general, different sets of genetic materials are needed under strictly semi-arid and irrigated environments A few lines targeted towards stressed conditions in fact possess yield plasticity resulting in their superior performance both under dryland and irrigated conditions

  21. Acknowledgement More information: www.iwwip.org IWWIP partners IWWP collaborators

  22. Thank You

More Related