1 / 16

ASSESSING BIODIVERSITY OF PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITIES FROM OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING

ASSESSING BIODIVERSITY OF PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITIES FROM OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING. Julia Uitz, Dariusz Stramski, and Rick A. Reynolds Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego. NASA Biodiversity Team Meeting – May 2010 – Washington DC.

ranit
Download Presentation

ASSESSING BIODIVERSITY OF PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITIES FROM OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ASSESSING BIODIVERSITY OF PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITIES FROM OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING Julia Uitz, Dariusz Stramski, and Rick A. Reynolds Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego NASA Biodiversity Team Meeting – May 2010 – Washington DC

  2. WHY STUDYING PHYTOPLANKTON DIVERSITY? • Phytoplankton diversity influences many important biogeochemical processes • Photosynthetic efficiency • Fate of carbon fixed via photosynthesis • Marine biological pump of carbon • Key questions to be addressed • Understanding of marine biogeochemical cycles and modeling capabilities • Distribution and variability on scales relevant to environment and climate changes

  3. Project objectives and strategy

  4. Ocean-color based discrimination of different phytoplankton groups • Satellite measurements of ocean color • Surface Chla concentration • Quasi-global spatial scale • Daily to decade • New generation of algorithms for discriminating different phytoplankton groups from ocean color • Dominance (Alvain et al. 2005) • Surface Chla (Devred et al. 2006; Hirata et al. 2008) • Vertical profile of Chla (Uitz et al. 2006)

  5. Ocean color-based primary production model P(t,z) = Chla(z,t) a*(z,t) PAR(z,t) Φc(z,t) Absorbed light energy Conversion to C • P: Primary production (g C m-3 d-1) • PAR: Irradiance available for photosynthesis (mol quanta m-2 s-1) • Chla: Concentration of chlorophyll a (mg m-3) • a*: Chla-specific absorption coefficient of phytoplankton [m2 (mg Chla)-1] • Φc: Quantum yield of carbon fixation [mol C (mol quanta)-1]

  6. Primary production at the phytoplantkon group level Ppg(t,z) = Chlapg(z,t) apg*(z,t) PAR(z,t) Φc,pg(z,t)

  7. (mg m-3) 10-year time series of SeaWiFS surface Chl (1997-2007) 1. Computation of Chla vertical profiles from surface Chla(Uitz et al. 2006) Chlamicro Chlanano Chlapico 2. Bio-optical model of Morel (1991) + photophysiological properties of Uitz et al. (2008) φmicro φnano φpico 3. Computation of group-specific primary production rates (Uitz et al. GBC in press) Pmicro Pnano Ppico Methodology Ppg(t,z) = Chlapg(z,t) apg*(z,t) PAR(z,t) Φc,pg(z,t)

  8. GLOBAL ANNUAL PRIMARY PRODUCTION

  9. CLIMATOLOGY OF MICROPHYTOPLANKTON PRODUCTION • Boreal winter/Austral summer • (Dec-Jan-Feb) • Boreal summer/Austral winter • (Jun-Jul-Aug) • Temp/subpolar latitudes in summer: high contribution (e.g. Atl Nord >50%) • Near-coastal upwelling systems: 70% (1 g C m-2 d-1) • South Pacific Subtropical Gyre: Minimum contribution (0.02 g C m-2 d-1)

  10. CLIMATOLOGY OF PICOPHYTOPLANKTON PRODUCTION • Boreal winter/Austral summer • (Dec-Jan-Feb) • Boreal summer/Austral winter • (Jun-Jul-Aug) • Maximum contribution in oligotrophic subtropical gyres (40-45%) • Contribution reduced to ~15% at high latitudes

  11. CLIMATOLOGY OF NANOPHYTOPLANKTON PRODUCTION • Boreal winter/Austral summer • (Dec-Jan-Feb) • Boreal summer/Austral winter • (Jun-Jul-Aug) • Substantial contribution on global scale: 0.07-1 g C m-2 d-1 (30-60%) • Can be found in extremely diverse environmental conditions (subtropical gyres vs. winter subantarctic waters  Biodiversity? (see Liu et al. PNAS 2009)

  12. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES • First climatology of phytoplankton group-specific primary production on global scale over seasonal to interannual scales • Significant contribution to our ability to understand and quantify marine carbon cycle with implications for carbon export • Key elements required to calibrate/validate new biogeochemical models (e.g. Le Quéré et al. 2005) • Benchmark for monitoring responses of marine pelagic ecosystems to climate change

  13. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES • Chla-based approaches • Describe general trends across various trophic regimes • But do not necessarily account for specific local conditions • New complementary approaches need to be developed • Explore the potential of hyperspectral optical measurement for discriminating different phytoplankton groups • Hyperspectral optical measurements have matured into powerful technologies in the field of remote sensing • Yet remain largely unexplored for open ocean applications

  14. HYPERSPECTRAL OPTICAL APPROACH • “Pilot” study • Small set of stations from Eastern Atlantic open ocean • HPLC pigments • Optical data • Encouraging results • Best classification with hyperspectral derivative spectra Evaluation of performance (Torecilla et al. in prep.)

  15. HYPERSPECTRAL OPTICAL APPROACH • 2nd cruise in the Atlantic Ocean almost completed!

  16. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

More Related