1 / 55

FST 696

FST 696. TECHNICAL PROBLEM SOLVING (numbers match the syllabus). 1. FST 696. Sheryl Barringer - instructor Heather Biehl and Ashley Updike - TAs Meets Tuesday & Thursday 2-5 pm Capstone course and third writing course for undergraduate majors in FST and food business management

randy
Download Presentation

FST 696

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FST 696 TECHNICAL PROBLEM SOLVING (numbers match the syllabus)

  2. 1. FST 696 • Sheryl Barringer - instructor • Heather Biehl and Ashley Updike - TAs • Meets Tuesday & Thursday 2-5 pm • Capstone course and third writing course for undergraduate majors in FST and food business management • Real, current industry problems used

  3. 1. FST 696 COMMUNICATIONS • e-mail list (give me current email) • information is on the FST 696 homepage, which can be accessed through the departmental home page to courses on the web • OR DIRECTLY AT http://class.Fst.Ohio-state.Edu/fst696/fst696.Html

  4. 2. OBJECTIVE: Learn how to solve problems • Lecture on techniques • Analyze real industrial technical problems • Discuss what problem solving techniques worked and what didn’t • I can’t teach you to think. I can only put you in a position where you have to think.

  5. 2. OBJECTIVE: Work well with others • Work in teams • Why: you have to wherever you work • Nobody ever achieved greatness by themselves • To learn: Every individual in the team is important • Each member is accountable for reports made by the team

  6. 2. OBJECTIVE: Build confidence • Develop confidence in your ability to solve problems – YOU can solve these problems • Believing you can do it is half the battle • These problems will be hard – no one right answer- no obvious answer (or it’s wrong!)

  7. 2. OBJECTIVE: Communication • Improve skills in written and oral communication • Employers tell us that you need more practice • You will be judged not on what you do, but on what you tell people you do

  8. 2. OBJECTIVE: Learn some FS • Learn a lot of technical facts • How much is up to you

  9. 2. Technical Services Group • Starting next week, you are an employee, not a student (no, you don’t get paid) • There will be few lectures • You have to do the critical thinking

  10. 3. APPROACH • Real technical problems • Students work in partnership with industry • A company representative will provide the problem and serve as a liaison between the company and the students • Both “short term” and “long term” problems • Communication of solutions will be both written and oral

  11. 4. SHORT TERM PROBLEMS • Teams of three - one student will be leader for each problem - 3 problems per quarter • A real industry problem will be presented • Team decides which problem solving techniques to use • Teams will have a week to come up with causes, solutions and questions • Industry rep will answer questions • Teams have a week to evaluate causes and solutions for practicality, and write report

  12. 4. SHORT TERM (CONT.) • Team leader writes a written report (2p+) • Team leader gives a 5 minute oral summary • Team reports which techniques were used • Class discusses which worked and which didn’t • Suggested major causes and solutions will be summarized • Feed back will be give toindustry rep. • Industry rep will respond where possible

  13. 4. SHORT TERM - WRITTEN REPORT (2p) • Statement of problem - with redefinition if required • Most probable causes - back up with reference citations • Suggested solutions - listed in order of decreasing priority

  14. 4. SHORT TERM - WRITTEN REPORT (beyond 2p) • References - cited in form used by the Journal of Food Science http://ift.manuscriptcentral.com/index.html?mode=instruction • List of causes (10 min) and solutions (10 min) • Problem solving technique(s) used and if they worked

  15. 4. LONG TERM PROBLEMS • Two teams of three will form a group of six. A group captain will be appointed • Group will work on the long term problem for the entire quarter • An industry rep. will be available as a resource • Hands-on work will be done to assist in problem solving

  16. 4. LONG TERM - CONT. • Group will contact the industrial rep to get better definition of the problem • Group will decide their approach to solving the problem • Group requests laboratory or pilot plant access; supplies and equipment as required • Group will report back to the class and to the company rep on a regular basis

  17. 4. LONG TERM (CONT.) • Team decides which problem solving techniques to use • ½ way team reports which techniques have been used and which others will be used • Class discusses which worked and which didn’t

  18. 4. LONG TERM - CONT. • Group will provide a preliminary written report. 2 page maximum • A final written group report will be graded for English and content. 20-50 pages including attachments • The group will make a final oral report to the class - with each group member participating (15-30 min)

  19. 5. PARTICIPATION GRADE • Being present and on time to all required classes • Participating in discussions • Participating in experimentation • Taking an active role in all assignments • Neither dominating nor sitting out of group activities • Group members evaluate all members • Instructor evaluates all members

  20. 6. STUDENT RESPONSIBILITIES • Be prepared for class • Be punctual • Understand assignments • Be assertive without being aggressive • Be a contributor • Consult literature and known authorities • Be concise • Get to the solution

  21. 7. GRADING • Group performance - short problems 20% • Individual written & oral short term 20% • Participation & peer evaluation 15% • Interim LT report 10% • Final LT report 25% • Group oral report – long term prob. 10% • Exact grading sheets are on the web

  22. Magic Formula for problem solving ( in only 3 steps)

  23. The 3 steps: • 1) Knowledge • 2) Inspiration • 3) Practicality

  24. Alternate between gathering knowledge and inspiration • When that is all done…. • Then look at practicality

  25. 1) Knowledge • Where? • What categories? • What subject areas?

  26. Where do you gather knowledge? • Experts • Books • Journals • Internet (be very careful) • The source of the problem- need to have researched and developed a hypothesis before you talk to him/her • Etc….

  27. What categories? • Ingredients- i.e. potatoes, oil, starch…. • Process- i.e. time, temperature • Equipment- i.e. retort, aseptic • There is a solution in all 3 categories

  28. What subject areas? • Food science • Cookbooks • Marketing • Physics • Engineering • Etc….

  29. Common questions asked: • Does this occur all the time? • How is the product made, shipped, stored?- (WHY are you asking this?????) • Are there recent changes (ingred., process)?- (don’t STOP THINKING) • Is it always a problem or sporadic? • Is it only a problem with some customers/seasons/plants/shifts?

  30. The 3 steps: • 1) Knowledge • 2) Inspiration • 3) Practicality

  31. 2) Inspiration • Reserve judgment • Fun is Fundamental • Stimuli is critical

  32. Reserve judgment • Respect the newborn (no criticizing) • Why: • Some ideas aren’t as stupid as they sound • Once you criticize, that person will never contribute again • Many solutions come from stupid ideas

  33. Fun is Fundamental

  34. Stimuli is critical • Magazines • Cookbooks • Competitor’s products • Absurd, unrelated objects • Etc…

  35. Why?

  36. Jump Start Your Brain handout • Chose 1 method for each ST and LT problem • End of written: method used • Will discuss which methods worked in class

  37. The 3 steps: • 1) Knowledge • 2) Inspiration • 3) Practicality

  38. 3) Practicality • AFTER you have finished knowledge and inspiration steps

  39. 3) Practicality • Possible? • Good idea? • Prioritize.

  40. Is It Possible? • Is it legal? • Is it physically possible? • Is it possible with current technology? • Use experimental design to test it

  41. Is it a good idea? • Is it ethical? • Is it economical? • Food safety issues • Environmental concerns • Nutrient preservation • Consumer survey • Marketing and advertising concerns • Gut instinct

  42. Prioritize solutions • Process- easiest to change • Ingredients- affects sensory, marketing • Equipment- costs the most money

  43. What does COSI say?

  44. How will you be graded? • 1) Knowledge • 2) Inspiration • 3) Practicality

  45. 1) Knowledge • ST and LT written reports:- large number or references- variety of references- details in the ST report

  46. 2) Inspiration • ST and LT written reports:- large number of ideas (listed at end)- variety of ideas- final ST will have at least 1 great idea

  47. 3) Practicality • ST should have no bad ideas • No solutions that the company said wouldn’t work • No solutions that the evidence shows doesn’t work • No solutions that are unethical, illegal, impractical, impossible….

More Related