1 / 38

New Hampshire Broadband Mapping & Planning Program: Growing Our Connectivity

New Hampshire Broadband Mapping & Planning Program: Growing Our Connectivity. Kenn Ortmann, Chairman, NH Association of Regional Planning Commissions Tim Murphy, Executive Director, Southwest Region Planning Commission Fay Rubin, Project Director, NHBMPP, University of New Hampshire

randellc
Download Presentation

New Hampshire Broadband Mapping & Planning Program: Growing Our Connectivity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New HampshireBroadband Mapping & Planning Program:Growing Our Connectivity Kenn Ortmann, Chairman, NH Association of Regional Planning Commissions Tim Murphy, Executive Director, Southwest Region Planning Commission Fay Rubin, Project Director, NHBMPP, University of New Hampshire Michael Blair, Project Coordinator, NHBMPP, University of New Hampshire Steve Schaffer, GIS Manager, Nashua Regional Planning Commission Local Government Center Annual Conference November 17, 2010

  2. Broadband Funding under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 The Recovery Act appropriated $7.2 billion and directed the Department of Agriculture's Rural Utilities Service (RUS) and the Department of Commerce's National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to expand broadband access to unserved and underserved communities across the U.S. in order to increase jobs, spur investments in technology and infrastructure, and provide long-term economic benefits.  The result: • RUS Broadband Initiatives Program (BIP) – loans/grants for broadband infrastructure projects in rural areas; • NTIA Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) – grants to fund broadband infrastructure, public computer centers and sustainable broadband adoption projects.

  3. Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) “The U.S. Congress has appropriated $4.7 billion to establish Broadband Technology Opportunities Program for awards to eligible entities to develop and expand broadband services to rural and underserved areas and improve access to broadband by public safety agencies …” • $ 3.9 billion - for broadband expansion • $250 million – innovative programs that encourage sustainable adoption of broadband services • $200 million – build capacity at public computing centers, including community colleges and public libraries • $10 million - transfer to the Office of Inspector General for the purposes of BTOP audits and oversight • $350 million - development and maintenance of statewide broadband inventory maps. (Grants to all 50 states, 5 territories, and District of Columbia. Total allocation $103 million round 1; $190 allocated in supplemental award.)

  4. New Hampshire Broadband Mapping & Planning Program Partners • University of New Hampshire: • GRANIT/Complex Systems Research Center • Computing & Information Services • Cooperative Extension • Regional Planning Commissions: • Central New Hampshire Regional Planning Commission • Lakes Region Planning Commission • Nashua Regional Planning Commission • North Country Council • Rockingham Planning Commission • Southern NH Regional Planning Commission • Southwest Region Planning Commission • Strafford Regional Planning Commission • Upper Valley Lake Sunapee Regional Planning Commission • NH Department of Resources and Economic Development • NH Office of Energy and Planning • Community Development Finance Authority • Granite State Distance Learning Network • * Partners in broadband mapping component

  5. NHBMPP Program Components Round 1 ($1.7 million) Mapping (Jan 2010 – Dec 2011): $1.2 million Identify, inventory, map, and verify areas served by current broadband infrastructure – by type of technology and speed of transmission Identify areas unserved or underserved Develop/maintain Community Anchor Institutions data set Planning (Jan 2011 – Dec 2014): $490K Supplemental ($4.4 million) Mapping (Jan 2011 – Dec 2014): $1.5 million Rural Addressing (Jan 2011 – Dec 2013): $410K Nonmapping (Jan 2011 – Dec 2014): $2.45 million Technical Assistance to local boards through web resources (OEP & UNH Cooperative Extension - $.95 m) Statewide Broadband Capacity Building (DRED, CDFA & UNH - $.8 m) Local / Regional Broadband Planning (RPCs, OEP - $.7 m)

  6. Mapping Component Overview Acquire/Process Service Provider Data Obtain service coverage data from providers: broadband availability, technology, speed, infrastructure, and for wireless – spectrum used Inventory Community Anchor Institutions/State Agencies Map location of each CAI, and conduct telephone survey to collect broadband access information Conduct Analysis Compile the provider information into statewide maps displaying areas served by type of technology and speed tier Share and Display Information Develop consumer reporting and mapping website(s): www.iwantbroadbandnh.org

  7. Key Definitions Broadband - Advertised speeds of at least 768 kbps downstream and 200 kbps upstream Unserved area – One or more contiguous census blocks where >= 90% of households (HH’s) lack access to facilities-based terrestrial BB service, fixed or mobile (at minimum speed noted above) Underserved area - One or more contiguous census blocks where one of the following factors is present: • <= 50% of HH have access to facilities-based terrestrial BB service (at minimum speed noted above) • no fixed or mobile BB provider advertises transmission speeds of at least three mbps; or • the rate of BB subscribership for the area is <= 40% of HHs.

  8. Census Geography • Block: • Smallest unit of geography for data collection • Bounded by visible features • Tract: • Subdivision of county • Optimum size of 4,000 people, but can range from 1,500 – 8,000 • Initially, goal is for homogeneity w/r to population characteristics Source: www.census.gov/www.cengeoga.pdf

  9. Census Geography • Block: • Smallest unit of geography for data collection • Bounded by visible features • Tract: • Subdivision of county • Optimum size of 4,000 people, but can range from 1,500 – 8,000 • Initially, goal is for homogeneity w/r to population characteristics

  10. Source Data Sets Service provider data GRANIT base map layers Census derivatives – roads, census blocks Aerial photography Parcel data Tabular data from assorted sources (DHHS master list of health care facilities) Vegetation Topography

  11. Progress to Date Development of guidance/protocols Identification of active service providers Execution of NDAs with providers Acquisition and processing of provider data sets Development of preliminary statewide coverage maps by type of technology Development of preliminary CAI data set (3500+ records) Web site development (iwantbroadbandnh.org) Hosting community broadband forums (14 of 15 complete) Using Cellular Expert software (www.cellular-expert.com) to predict signal strength. Note: Data generated for display purposes only, and does not represent the actual coverage area of any service provider.

  12. Signal Propagation Modeling Using Cellular Expert software (www.cellular-expert.com) to predict signal strength. Note: This data was generated for display purposes only, and does not represent the actual coverage area of any service provider.

  13. BroadbandAvailabilityinNew HampshireBased on data reported as of:September, 2010

  14. Community Anchor Institution MappingBased on data reported as of:September, 2010

  15. Community Anchor Institution MappingBased on data reported as of:September, 2010

  16. Community Anchor Institution MappingBased on data reported as of:September, 2010

  17. Community Anchor Institution Mapping Distribution by Type of Technology Distribution by Advertised Downstream Speed

  18. Data Verification Internal logical checks Speed test on web - ~2,000 records FCC data sets Community forums/surveys Satellite dish survey Input from local officials Commercial connectivity data sets Metered drive tests? Preliminary data September 30, 2010

  19. Initial Speed Test Results

  20. Community Forum Schedule

  21. Broadband Survey

  22. Get Involved:www.iwantbroadbandnh.org

  23. Network New Hampshire NowGrant Award Round 2 Community, educational, and technology leaders created Network New Hampshire Now (NNHN), to build an integrated open access middle mile and last mile fiber optic network with a focus on unserved and underserved areas of the state. NNHN will significantly increase the capacity and capability of the state’s telecommunications infrastructure while making future last mile build-out easier and less expensive. The business model provides affordable broadband service choices to New Hampshire communities and aligns with all seven BTOP priorities. Grant Request was for $44.5 Million with a $22 Million match. Notified of award 6/30/10.

  24. Rural Addressing 3 year project - Jan 2011 – Dec 2013: $410K Collaborative effort between UNH & 9 RPC’s Funding for commercial datasets and GPS units Creates GIS address points for area not covered by commercial data

  25. Rural AddressingPoint Data

  26. Rural Addressing - Benefits Geocoding & validation for broadband mapping Wide-ranging applications at local, regional & state levels Planning Economic Development Emergency Services Public works / Roads Health & Human Services Emergency Services

  27. Rural Addressing Number of census blocks greater than 2 sq. miles: 780 (Census, 2000) No. of expected address points in blocks > 2 sq. miles: 29,047 (Census, 2000) Estimated % of land area and state population for non‐located points in blocks > 2 sq. miles: 47% of the land area and 6.3% of the population

  28. Rural Addressing Scope Generation of Project Plan- Year 2 (of Broadband Program - Starting Jan 2011) Identify address point gap areas - Year 2 Acquire GPS Units and train Partner/RPC staff - Year 2 Coordinate local volunteers to collect data points in the field. - Years 3-4 Quality control and data verification - Years 3-4 Integration and crowd source verification with IwantBroadbandNH.org website - Years 3-4 Final deliverable - End of Year 4 (Broadband Program)

  29. Planning Component - Overview • Utilizes the data development, inventory and mapping components of the project • Begins in Year 2 (calendar year 2011) and extends through Year 5 (2014) • Makes use of Regional Broadband Stakeholder Groups • Coordinated by NH’s Regional Planning Commissions

  30. Planning Component - NH is comprised of 9 RPC Districts

  31. Planning Component - Tasks • Formation of Regional Broadband Stakeholder Groups (BSGs) • Conduct meetings and provide staff support to BSGs • Conduct Regional Broadband Public Forums • Coordinate/integrate other NHBMPP activities • Develop Regional Broadband Planning Documents

  32. Planning Component - BSG Activities • Determination and prioritization of need for broadband services • Identification of and proposed solutions to barriers for deployment • Foster collaboration among government officials, business leaders, institutions, ISPs • Consider broadband as basic infrastructure

  33. Planning Component - Timeline 2011 • Formation of BSGs • Review of mapping component analysis • Identify partners and areas/populations of need • Begin prioritizing need for broadband services • Establish relationships with providers • Identify barriers for broadband deployment

  34. Planning Component - Timeline (cont.) 2012 • On-going review of mapping component analysis • Coordinate/integrate other NHBMPP activities • Propose solutions to identified barriers for broadband deployment • Develop draft regional broadband plans • Conduct regional broadband planning forums

  35. Planning Component - Timeline (cont.) 2013-14 • On-going review of mapping component analysis • Refine/maintain regional broadband plans • Coordinate/integrate other NHBMPP activities • Conduct annual regional broadband planning forums

  36. Next Steps Continue mapping/inventory activities Analyze unserved/underserved areas Continue building out web site: Develop and post state maps Complete on-line broadband survey instrument Develop and host interactive map viewer Enhanced interactions with service providers Initiate planning and other non-mapping components – Jan. 2011 Initiate rural addressing – Jan. 2011

  37. Contact Information www.iwantbroadbandnh.org Tim Murphy Executive Director – Southwest Region Planning Commission tmurphy@swrpc.org Fay Rubin Project Director – University of New Hampshire fay.rubin@unh.edu Michael Blair Project Coordinator – University of New Hampshire michael.blair@unh.edu Steve Schaffer GIS Manager – Nashua Regional Planning Commission steves@nashuarpc.org

More Related