1 / 25

UI-Integrate Project Update for the Board of Trustees

UI-Integrate Project Update for the Board of Trustees. November 14, 2002. Agenda. Background (will not present) Budget & Staffing Accomplishments and Plans for Next Year - HR / Payroll Finance Student Admin Overall Project Project Challenges and Risks Summary.

raja
Download Presentation

UI-Integrate Project Update for the Board of Trustees

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UI-Integrate Project Updatefor the Board of Trustees November 14, 2002

  2. Agenda • Background (will not present) • Budget & Staffing • Accomplishments and Plans for Next Year - HR / Payroll • Finance • Student Admin • Overall Project • Project Challenges and Risks • Summary

  3. What is UI-Integrate? • An opportunity to improve business practices and ensure continued delivery of core services and functions • The University of Illinois configured implementation of the Banner2000 system from SCT – a cost effective, integrated and sustainable business and student services platform • Involves Human Resources, Financial and Student Administration functions • Five-year project (July 1, 2000 – June 30, 2005)

  4. What are SCT & Banner? • SCT is a global information technology solutions company, serving more than 2,500 clients worldwide • Banner2000, developed by SCT, is an integrated software package designed for the higher education market

  5. UI-Integrate Benefits • Allows for the adoption of more contemporary administrative “best practices” • University data in one system results in higher quality data • Transaction updates occur in real time for more accurate, current data • Enhanced, simplified and more consistent reporting • A better technology foundation for the future • Mitigates risk to essential services posed by current network of aging systems, e.g. Payroll system

  6. Project Governance

  7. Project Leadership • UI Project Executive • Rich Mendola, Associate Vice President Administrative Information Technology Services • UI Project Director • Margaret Krol, Assistant Vice President, ERP Implementation • SCT Account Executive • Paul Setze • Accenture Partner • Jim Flowers

  8. Project Methodology Lifecycle • Work planning • Defining scope of work to be accomplished and overall assumptions • Design • Focuses on redesigning business processes, configuring the software, identifying software gaps, and developing approaches to close the gaps • Implementation • Focuses on building, testing, and rolling out the new software and business processes to the user community

  9. Training/Ed Approach Total End Users: • Process • Transition Workshops • Unit Readiness Labs • News • Web • Newsletters • Email • Connections • Existing Online Learning Systems • Policies & Procedures • Training • Instructor Led • Self-directed • WBT CBT • Training Management • Course Enrollment • Tracking & Reporting • On-Line Reference • How-to • Procedures • FAQs

  10. Budget and Staffing

  11. Original UI-Integrate Budget (Includes Decision Support Costs)

  12. Budget Reduction • Original Budget of $197,247,343 included $30,442,289 for network infrastructure upgrades • The network infrastructure upgrade budget was reduced by $11,050,000 as part of last year’s rescission, resulting in a total budget of $186,197,343

  13. Budget Status Updated 11.01.2002

  14. Contingency status Starting contingency balance $15,000,000 Education & Training (includes ~$300K other)($5,962,578) Approved Finance modifications ($1,534,403) Approved Finance/HR modifications($176,400) Approved HR modifications($490,920) Approved Student modifications($411,365) Additional personnel management support($65,240) Additional EAI message development($800,000) Additional facilities expenses($958,623) Current contingency balance $4,600,471 * as of 11.01.2002

  15. Project Staffing

  16. Staffing Comments • We have been very successful in recruiting high-quality staff, given the downturn in the economy • Our current five year staffing profile resembles a bell curve, compared to the original “flatter” projections, due to the “big bang” Finance and HR go-lives • This pattern has compressed more of the staffing costs into FY03 and FY04 and has resulted in higher peak demands for space

  17. HR/Pay Accomplishments • In production with / retired old system that supports: • Employee Biographic/Demographic information • Employee Relations foundation data • Completed design phase for: • Benefits Administration • Position & Compensation

  18. HR/Pay Plan for Next 12 Months • Complete design for: • Employment Administration • Payroll • Time and Attendance

  19. Finance Accomplishments • Completed design for: • Chart of Accounts • General Ledger • Purchasing • Accounts Payable • Fixed Assets • Grants & Contracts

  20. Finance Plan for Next 12 Months • Complete design for: • Budgeting • Implement • Chart of Accounts • General Ledger • Accounts payable • Purchasing • Fixed Assets • Grants & Contracts • Accounts Receivable

  21. Student Accomplishments • Completed design phase for: • Financial Aid • Accounts Receivable • Completed implementation for Recruiting • Got signoff from Faculty Senates on key academic policy issues • Common course numbering • Common GPA calc • Common use of course “hours” • Common grading nomenclature

  22. Student Plan for next 12 months • Complete design phase for: • Course Catalog, Class Scheduling, & Location Management • Pre-Registration • Registration • Academic Records & General Student • Transfer Articulation • Complete implementation for: • Admissions (December 2002) • Course Catalog, Class Scheduling & Location Management • Financial Aid

  23. Overall Project Accomplishments • Training and Education • Coordinated Transition Workshops, Unit Liaison Meetings and Instructor Led Training in support of the go-lives; Assessments have all been in the Good to Excellent Range • Developed Web-based course on logon & navigation • Created online documentation for all instructional materials • Communication • Delivered over 200 project overview and status presentations • Software • Upgraded production software • Tested disaster recovery approach

  24. Project Challenges & Risks • Risks • Contemporary integration approach & “partnership” • Ability of SCT to address UI modifications • Impacts of budget cuts on departmental participation • Need to build HR bolt-on applications • Inherent challenges • Disputes about the scope of SCT modifications • Logistics of multi-campus project • Student practices differ across the three campuses • Linked with decision support project • Ability to identify sufficient resources (rooms and trainers) to support training efforts

  25. Summary • We are “in production” with two UI-Integrate modules • Major student go-live is imminent • FY03 finance go-live will include largest single set of business process changes the University has ever experienced • Budget is on target and sufficient contingency funds are available to address additional modifications and financial impacts of project risk areas

More Related