1 / 33

Quality of care

Quality of care. Israel De Alba, MD MPH Clinical Professor Health Sciences University of California, Irvine. Content . Introduction : quality of care today Core measures HCAPS Patient Satisfaction Survey Hospital R eadmission Reduction Program Universal Protocol (Time out ).

raine
Download Presentation

Quality of care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Quality of care Israel De Alba, MD MPH ClinicalProfessor HealthSciences University of California, Irvine

  2. Content • Introduction: quality of caretoday • Coremeasures • HCAPS Patient SatisfactionSurvey • Hospital ReadmissionReductionProgram • Universal Protocol (Time out)

  3. The new face of healthcare • Emphasis on efficient, lean care • Change in payment structure • Emphasis on disease rather than on health • Disease makes money; health doesn’t • The standard fee-for-service system that encourages doctors and other caregivers to give lots of tests, individual treatments and to prescribe drugs, instead of keeping patients well • Oversight: • Governtment agencies • Insurancecompanies • Quality agencies • Patients

  4. Quality of care (Institute of Medicine) • Safe – avoiding injuries to patients from the care that is supposed to help them. • Effective – providing services based on scientific knowledge to all who could benefit and refraining from providing services to those not likely to benefit (avoiding underuse and overuse). • Patient-centered – providing care that is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions. • Timely – reducing waits and sometimes harmful delays for both those who receive and those who give care. • Efficient – avoiding waste, in particular waste of equipment, supplies, ideas, and energy. • Equitable – providing care that does not vary in quality because of personal characteristics, such as gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and socioeconomic status.

  5. Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services • HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey is the first national, standardized, publicly reported survey of patients' perspectives of hospital care. • Contains 18 core questions • communication with nurses and doctors • responsiveness of hospital staff • the cleanliness and quietness of the hospital environment • pain management • communication about medicines • discharge information • overall rating of hospital • would they recommend the hospital

  6. Patientsatisfaction

  7. Core Measures: Joint Commission

  8. Heartfailure

  9. MI timelycare

  10. MI effectivecare

  11. Pneumoniamarkers

  12. DVT prevention

  13. Hospital acquiredinfections

  14. Hospital readmission reduction

  15. Decreasing Hospital Readmissions • Beginning in fiscal year (FY)2013, hospitals with higher than expected readmission rates will experience a decrease in payment for all Medicare discharges • Reduce payment to hospital by 1% in FY 2013 and 2% in 2014 and 3% beyond • Expected to save $7.1 billion over 10 years • Performance data will initially be based on 30 day readmissions for MI, HF and pneumonia • Additional conditions added in 2015 (COPD, CABG, PCA)

  16. Avoidable Readmissions • Evidence suggests many rehospitalization may be preventable • No one knows what proportion of readmissions are truly “avoidable”? • Large interstate and inter-hospital variation • Many readmissions are outside the control of the hospital or health system • Many readmissions are appropriate and the goal is not to avoid all readmissions • Some interventions have demonstrated the ability to decrease readmissions

  17. Readmissionrates

  18. Thepatientperspective • Patients did not necessarily see hospital readmissions as a problem • Many patients felt they were discharged too soon. • Many did not understand their discharge instructions. • Care instructions were too general. • Patients and caregivers wished they had been more assertive. • New diagnoses posed special challenges. • Primary care physicians were missing from the picture. • Some had only limited or no support once home. • Some were not ready to change behaviors • A few had chronic health conditions for years but were not educated about their illnesses.

  19. Thephysicianperspective • The issue is on their radar. • Readmissions are complicated. • There are financial pressures to discharge as soon as possible. • The quality and training of the providers can make a difference. • Some hospitals are improving the discharge process and in-hospital experience to reduce readmissions. • Some hospitals try to avoid readmissions by referring patients to their own outpatient clinics for follow-up care.

  20. Project RED Discharge Checklist Eleven mutually reinforcing components: 1. Medication reconciliation 2. Reconcile discharge plan with national guidelines 3. Follow-up appointments 4. Outstanding tests 5. Post-discharge services 6. Written discharge plan 7. What to do if problem arises 8. Patient education 9. Assess patient understanding 10. Discharge summary sent to PCP 11. Telephone reinforcement

  21. What is Universal Protocol? • The Joint Commission Board of Commissioners originally approved the Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure and Wrong Person Surgery • Process that involves 3 steps • Pre-procedure verification • Site marking • Time out

  22. Universal Protocol Three steps to patient safety • 1. Pre-procedure verification • 2. Site marking • 3. Time Out

  23. 1. Pre-procedure verification • The first SAFETY CHECK • Is a process of information gathering and confirmation, including verification of: • Correct patient, correct procedure, correct site • Documentation (H&P/interval note, consent form, other assessments) • Supplies: blood products, implants, devices, and/or special equipment for the procedure • Other: labeled diagnostic and radiology test results • Assures that missing information or discrepancies are addressed before starting the procedure

  24. 2. Site Marking • Required prior to procedures involving incisions or percutaneous puncture or insertion • Mark the site before the procedure is performed and involve the patient in the site marking process, if possible • The site does not need to be marked for bilateral structures Department Name | Month X, 201X

  25. 3. Time-Out • Final SAFETY CHECK before starting the procedure • Activities are suspended so that ALL team members can fully engage in the time out. • The focus is on ACTIVEconfirmation of the patient, site, and procedure • For bedside or ambulatory practice procedures, the physician performing the intervention or other trained member of the procedural team may lead the time-out. • The procedure is NOT started until all questions or concerns are resolved.

  26. Time-Out • The time-out must address: • Correct patient identity • Accurate procedure consent form or physician order • Correct side/site marked • Agreement on procedure to be done The time-out should also address, where applicable: • Correct patient position • Relevant images/results displayed • The need to administer antibiotics or fluids for irrigation • Safety precautions based on patient history or medication use.

  27. QUEST Documentation Department Name | Month X, 201X

  28. Department Name | Month X, 201X

  29. Summary and conclusions • Quality of care: why it matters to you • New paradigm • These changes will affect how we practice medicine

More Related