1 / 1

Rosnani Hashim, Moomala Othman, Wan Mazwati Wan Yusoff & Suhailah Hussein

Rosnani Hashim, Moomala Othman, Wan Mazwati Wan Yusoff & Suhailah Hussein. Centre for Philosophical Inquiry in Education, Institute of Education, International Islamic University Malaysia, PO BOX 10, Kuala Lumpur, 50728, Malaysia

raina
Download Presentation

Rosnani Hashim, Moomala Othman, Wan Mazwati Wan Yusoff & Suhailah Hussein

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rosnani Hashim, Moomala Othman, Wan Mazwati Wan Yusoff & Suhailah Hussein Centre for Philosophical Inquiry in Education, Institute of Education, International Islamic University Malaysia, PO BOX 10, Kuala Lumpur, 50728, Malaysia Phone: 03-6196-5327, Fax: 03-6196-4851, E-mail: cpie@iiu.edu.my Background Thinking is commanded by Allah as evident in the Qur’an and also from the tradition of the Prophet. The Malaysian Integrated Curriculum for Secondary School (KBSM) emphasizes creative and critical thinking skills (KBKK) and Teacher Education Programmes even offered courses for pre- and in -service teachers. However, we lack a programme that is appropriate for Muslim youth. This was the impetus for the researcher’s interest in this field and this research is an effort to contribute to the development of Muslim youth from within their Islamic tradition. There are many thinking programmes already in existence. However, this research project is based on the notion of philosophy for rational thinking. Lipman’s Philosophy for Children Programme was used as a model. Using his framework, I have attempted to develop a philosophical inquiry programme for Muslim youth that incorporates common, central and contestable concepts in Muslim society and also Islamic ethical values, and thus the name HIKMAH. The objective of the programme is to make Muslim youth of various levels (primary, secondary and tertiary) become more critical, creative and ethical in their thoughts and also more articulate in their presentation of arguments. This programme also improves students’ communicative and language skills. Two important elements that are essential for the success of the programme are the specialized instructional materials and specially trained teachers because of its unique methodology. In this regards, I have worked to produce the materials and have also tested them with the students. I have also trained teachers using modules that I have worked on. The teachers need to help students make sense of their world, and to open up new worlds of knowledge and experience. The outcomes from this research project are teacher training modules, instructional materials – narratives and concept games, theses, papers, and a continuous Hikmah School Holiday Programme and partnership with schools. Research RosnaniHashim conducted an experimental study in 2003 to find out the effect of doing philosophy on critical thinking skills among primary school students. Students, who were from the average ability group, were subjected to doing philosophy in Malay language for one hour per week for 12 weeks. The effect on critical thinking skills was measured using The New Jersey Test of Reasoning Skills. Pre and post test showed a significant difference in critical thinking skills. Rosnani, in 2004, replicated the same study but on high and average ability groups in Tampin, Negeri Sembilan. Both groups (12 years old students) were doing philosophy using English language for one hour everyday for three weeks. Similar improvement was reported for high ability group. In 2005, Moomala Othman conducted a comparative study between Reader Response and Philosophy for Children (P4C) approaches among Form Four students from a fully residential science school in Ulu Yam, Selangor. The study reported a significant mean different in thinking and reading abilities for P4C group. A two-hour weekly programme was conducted for Form Three students of (SekolahBerasramaPenuhIntegrasi) SBPI Gombak from Feb. to May 2005. Students found that the programme helped them to improve their speaking, communication and critical thinking skills, and enhance their self-confidence. Similar views were reported by IIUM students who attended the programme at SLEU. Even though this programme produced good outcomes, but it was only held for 3 semesters because of lack of fund. In 2009, Norillah Abdullah did an experimental study to examine the effectiveness of the pedagogy of philosophical Inquiry (PI) in enhancing critical thinking and self-confidence among undergraduate students of the Kulliyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge, IIUM. The result showed that critical thinking skills and self-confidence among the treatment group (using PI) improved significantly. Products Published Research paper RosnaniHashim. (2005a). Kemahiranberfikir, hikmahdankeperluan program pengajaranfalsafahdisekolah. [Thinking skills, wisdom and the necessity for teaching philosophy program in school] JurnalPendidikan Islam. 11(2), 46-68 RosnaniHashim. (2005c). Rethinking Islamic education in facing the challenges of the twenty-first century. American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences. 22(4), 133-147. RosnaniHashim. (2006). Philosophy in schools in the Malaysian context. Singapore: Singapore Teachers’ Union. Moomala Othman & RosnaniHashim. (2007). Critical thinking and reading skills: A comparative study of the Reader Response and Philosophy for Children program approaches. Thinking, 18(2), 26-34. RosnaniHashim. (2009). Philosophy in the Islamic tradition: Implications for the Philosophy for Children Program (P4C). In E. Marsal, T. Dobashi and B. Weber (eds.), Children philosophize worldwide: Theoretical and practical concepts. Germany: Peter Lang. Paper Presented at Conference RosnaniHashim. (2005b). The effect of P4C on reading and reasoning skills of average and high achievers in a Malaysian primary school. Paper presented at 12th Learning Conference at Universidad de Granada, Spain on July 10-13. RosnaniHashim. (2006). Philosophy enriched English lessons for critical thinking. Paper presented at Malaysia International Centre for English Language Teaching Conference at Hotel Equatorial Melaka. May 8 – 10. RosnaniHashim. (2008a). Reviving the pedagogy of philosophical inquiry among Muslim teachers and students. Paper presented at International Conference on Teacher Education in the Muslim World at Crown Princess Hotel, Kuala Lumpur. July 16-18. RosnaniHashim. (2008b). Developing capacities for critical thinking and philosophical reasoning in schools. Paper presented at the Seminar Commemorating World Philosophy Day: The Role Universities in Promoting Dialogue Through Philosophy on 17th November 2008, Centre for Civilizational Dialogue, University Malaya. Theses Critical thinking and reading skills: A comparative study of the Reader Response and Philosophy for Children program approaches. Unpublished Ph. D dissertation in English Language Studies, International Islamic University Malaysia, Gombak by Moomala Othman (2005). The pedagogy of philosophical inquiry (PI) as an approach to develop critical thinking and self-confidence: A case study of undergraduate students in IIUM. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation in curriculum and instruction, International Islamic University Malaysia, Gombak by Norillah Abdullah (2009). Reviving the Muslim minds through doing philosophy: Implications for curriculum of Muslim education. Unpublished Ph. D dissertation in English Language Studies, International Islamic University Malaysia, Gombak by Wan Mazwati Wan Yusoff (2010). Materials Narratives – Thinking stories in the form of novels and short stories Concept game – Philosophical card game, mind mapping, classification game Teacher resources – discussion plans, exercises, teacher evaluation rubric, student assessment rubric Training Manuals Participants’ views of the programme “It opens my mind to new ways of looking at things,” 13 year old student (29/11/07) “It gives me confidence to express my view and defend it,” 14 year old student “I am able to think more logically now,” 13 year old student “It improves my English,” 10 year old student “… there are a lot of debates with hot issues, the programme also improves the confidence level and helps make friend with others,” Master student AIKOL (18/9/07). “Communication skills, Argumentation, Overcome the feeling of shy,” first year student KIRKHS (18/9/07).. “Before I join this programme I feel afraid to ask questions if I don’t understand I prefer to keep quiet. Now I am able to ask questions,” First year student KIRKHS (18/9/07). “it helps me think more seriously and make reason for something to make a conclusion “, 15 year old “I like this programme because it gives me opportunity to speak in english and became more confident. It also helps in my critical and creative thinking ‘, 15 year old students. “this programme teaches me how to raise questionns and improve my vocabulary and grammar. It also teach me how to make moral judgement “, 15 year old student Primary school students’ views of the programme It is interesting. I am able to share my point of view with others. It helps me to understand things better. It is interesting, enjoying and helps me to improve my English, Furthermore, it helps me to think creatively. I learned how to read with a proper intonation. my thinking skill in a critically way and teach me how to discuss so I can be open minded boy. I gives me more new ideas and this class is very interesting. We can also change our own ideas with our friends. Besides that, it makes me think more and improve my English. Another thing I like this class is because sometimes we sill also have argument with some questions. It is enjoyfull and I began to think of consequences of my action before acting on it. It is useful to writing the questions on the board. I think this class can be useful for all participated. I like this class because it is interesting, enjoyable and we can get closer between friends and teacher. It improves my English. It makes me think in a creative and innovative way. By following this class. I became an open minded person.

More Related