1 / 19

Animals , animism and vernacular theorising

Animals , animism and vernacular theorising Ülo Valk Department of Estonian and Comparative Folklore , University of Tartu. Contents :. 1) proverbs as statements of belief, 2) animals in neo-animist studies 3) p roverbs about animals’ identity ( Arvo Krikmann 1999)

rafal
Download Presentation

Animals , animism and vernacular theorising

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Animals, animism and vernaculartheorising Ülo ValkDepartmentofEstonian and ComparativeFolklore,Universityof Tartu

  2. Contents: 1) proverbs as statements of belief, 2) animals in neo-animist studies 3) proverbsabout animals’ identity (ArvoKrikmann 1999) 4) Human-animal transformations: cases fromNorth Eastern India 5) Conclusion

  3. ArvoKrikmann: “Proverb is a generalized sentence, within the means of Estonian language a generalised statement (Haukujakoereihammusta) or a generalised imperative (Äravanassekaevusülita, kuiuutei ole)“ (1997: 52) Wolfgang Mieder: “Proverbs are concise traditional statements of apparent truths with currency among the folk. More elaborately stated, proverbs are short, generally known sentences of the folk that contain wisdom, truths, morals, and traditional views in a metaphorical, fixed, and memorizable form and that are handed down from generation to generation“ (2004: 4).

  4. Whyanimalsmatter? “Proverbs on Animal Identity: Typological Memoires” In: Proverb Semantics: Studies in Structure, Logic and Metaphor”. Edited by Wolfgang Mieder. The University of Vermont: Burlington, Vermont, 2009. 207-246. = “Vanasõnadloomadeidentiteedist(Tüpoloogilisimemuaare)”. - Mäetagused 19, 1999.

  5. Edward B. Tylor (1832 – 1917) • Religion – “belief in spiritual beings“ (1871) • Itsarchetypal form – soul, spiritofindividual • Animism – assumptionthat all objectshave a non-material, spiritual element

  6. GrahamHarvey

  7. StewartGuthrie • Animism–perceptual strategy ofpersonification • Religion – systematic anthropomorphism: the attribution of human characteristics to nonhuman things or events • Continuityofhumans and animals

  8. PhilippeDescola: Animism – an ontology that endows humans and non-humans with identical interiorities and different physicalities Distinctivefeatures of animism: • the subjectivity,which is attributed to plants, animals, and other elements of physical environment; • person to person relations that are maintained with these entities (Descola 2011: 18-19). [aclassic features of] “most animic ontologies is the capacity of metamorphosis attributed to beings who have a similar interiority: a human can take the shape of an animal; an animal can adopt the appearance of another animal; a plant or an animal can discard its bodily clothing to unveil its soul objectified in a human body” (ibid. 20).

  9. Eduardo Viveiros de Castro:Animism- an ontology which postulates the social character of relations between humans and non-humans (1998: 473) Perspectivism–“Typically, in normal conditions, humans see humans as humans, animals as animals and spirits (if they see them) as spirits; however, animals (predators) and spirits see humans as animals (as prey) to the same extent that animals (as prey) see humans as spirits or as animals (predators). By the same token, animals and spirits see themselves as humans: they perceive themselves as (or become) anthropomorphic beings [---]. In sum: animals are people, or see themselves as persons. Such a notion is virtually always associated with the idea that the manifest form of each species is a mere envelope (a ‘clothing’) which conceals an internal human form…” (“Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism” 1998: 470-471)

  10. Arvo Krikmann:“the semantic field of animals must be the most productive one in proverbial metaphors”(1999) A. Proverbs concerning animal identity B. Proverbs concerning the relationship between people and animals (usually in metaphorical meaning) C. Proverbs concerning the relationships between (metaphorical, as a rule) animals D. Proverbs concerning the relations of animals towards non-zoological nature and dimensions

  11. Mrs KreLyngdoh (30.01.2012) Raid KhatarNonglyngdoh, Ri-Bhoi district, Meghalaya

  12. ●Mayong

  13. “This is a story I have heard. When a human has to transform into a tiger, they first do jara-puka with water. Then the human transforms into a tiger by saying a mantra. Before turning into a tiger the man says [to his companion]: “When I become a tiger, I obviously become greedy when I see animals and humans because of the violent nature of a tiger. If you see that I get violent and I feel that I should attack someone, you sprinkle some water on me, then I’ll turn into a human again. If you are not able to sprinkle water on me, if you are scared…”, then he remains a tiger and goes to the jungle. To identify him as a human tiger (manu-bhag), some bejes used to wear rings on fingers. Then the were-tiger can be identified through the ring on the finger”. PhandidharNath (31. 01. 2012)

  14. WeretigersinthefolkloreofMayong: Human-animaltransformations: - instructions: man totiger - instructions: tigerto man - weretigersinaction - weretigercharacteristics

  15. Conclusions: howtounderstandhuman-animaltransformations? • Genre and narrativeworld • Genresystem • Animalmetaphors and projecting human psychologyon animals are aspects of animist world view

  16. Thankyou! I alsoexpressmygratitudeto MeenaxiBarkataki-Ruscheweyh, KishoreBhattacharjee, PallaviDutta, MargaretLyngdoh, PhanidharNath, PrabinSaikia, UtpalNath, NeelakshiGoswami, CentreofExcellenceinCulturalTheory (CECT)

More Related