Overhang
Download
1 / 44

Mike Paterson Uri Zwick - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 94 Views
  • Uploaded on

Overhang. Mike Paterson Uri Zwick. The overhang problem. How far off the edge of the table can we reach by stacking n identical blocks of length 1 ? J.G. Coffin – Problem 3009, American Mathematical Monthly (1923). “Real-life” 3D version. Idealized 2D version. The classical solution.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Mike Paterson Uri Zwick' - quito


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Mike paterson uri zwick

Overhang

Mike PatersonUri Zwick


The overhang problem
The overhang problem

How far off the edge of the table can we reach by stacking n identical blocks of length 1?

J.G. Coffin – Problem 3009, American Mathematical Monthly (1923).

“Real-life” 3D version

Idealized 2D version


The classical solution
The classical solution

Using n blocks we can get an overhang of

Harmonic Piles





Diamonds
Diamonds?

The 4-diamond is stable


Diamonds1
Diamonds?

The 5-diamond is …


Diamonds2
Diamonds?

The 5-diamond isUnstable!






Equilibrium
Equilibrium

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

Force equation

F1 + F2 + F3 = F4 + F5

Moment equation

x1 F1+ x2 F2+ x3 F3 = x4 F4+ x5 F5


Forces between blocks
Forces between blocks

Assumption: No friction.All forces are vertical.

Equivalent sets of forces


Stability

1

1

3

Stability

Definition: A stack of blocks is stable iff there is an admissible set of forces under which each block is in equilibrium.



Checking stability1
Checking stability

F5

F6

F2

F4

F3

F1

F8

F11

F12

F7

F10

F9

F14

F13

F15

F16

Equivalent to the feasibilityof a set of linear inequalities:

F17

F18


Stability and collapse
Stability and Collapse

A feasible solution of the primal system gives a set of stabilizing forces.

A feasible solution of the dual system describes an infinitesimal motion that decreases the potential energy.


Mike paterson uri zwick

Blocks = 4

Overhang = 1.16789

Blocks = 7

Overhang = 1.53005

Blocks = 6

Overhang = 1.4367

Blocks = 5

Overhang = 1.30455

Small optimal stacks


Mike paterson uri zwick

Blocks = 17

Overhang = 2.1909

Blocks = 16

Overhang = 2.14384

Blocks = 19

Blocks = 18

Overhang = 2.27713

Overhang = 2.23457

Small optimal stacks


Mike paterson uri zwick

Support and balancing blocks

Principalblock

Balancing set

Support set


Mike paterson uri zwick

Support and balancing blocks

Balancing set

Principalblock

Support set


Mike paterson uri zwick

Loaded stacks

Stacks with downward external forces acting on them

Principalblock

Size= number of blocks + sum of external forces.

Support set


Mike paterson uri zwick

Spinal stacks

Stacks in which the support set contains only one block at each level

Principalblock

Support set


Mike paterson uri zwick

Loaded vs. standard stacks

Loaded stacks are slightly more powerful.

Conjecture: The difference is bounded by a constant.


Mike paterson uri zwick

Optimal spinal stacks

Optimality condition:


Spinal overhang
Spinal overhang

Let S(n) be the maximal overhang achievable using a spinal stack with n blocks.

Let S*(n) be the maximal overhang achievable using a loaded spinal stack on total weight n.

Theorem:

Conjecture:

A factor of 2 improvement over harmonic stacks!


100 blocks example
100 blocks example

Towers

Shadow

Spine


Are spinal stacks optimal
Are spinal stacks optimal?

No!

Support set is not spinal!

Blocks = 20

Overhang = 2.32014


Optimal weight 100 construction
Optimal weight 100 construction

Weight = 100

Blocks = 47

Overhang = 4.20801




Parabolic constructions
“Parabolic” constructions

5-stack

Number of blocks:

Overhang:

Stable!


Mike paterson uri zwick

Using n blocks we can get an overhang of (n1/3) !!!

An exponential improvementover theO(log n)overhang of spinal stacks !!!


Parabolic constructions1
“Parabolic” constructions

5-slab

4-slab

3-slab


R slab
r-slab

5-slab


R slab1
r-slab

5-slab


R slab2
r-slab

5-slab


Vases
“Vases”

Weight = 1151.76

Blocks = 1043

Overhang = 10


Vases1
“Vases”

Weight = 115467.

Blocks = 112421

Overhang = 50


Oil lamps
“Oil lamps”

Weight = 1112.84

Blocks = 921

Overhang = 10


Open problems
Open problems

  • Is the (n1/3) construction tight?

Yes! Shown recently by Paterson-Peres-Thorup-Winkler-Zwick

  • What is the asymptotic shape of “vases”?

  • What is the asymptotic shape of “oil lamps”?

  • What is the gap between brick-wall constructionsand general constructions?

  • What is the gap between loaded stacks and standard stacks?