1 / 44

# Mike Paterson Uri Zwick - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Overhang. Mike Paterson Uri Zwick. The overhang problem. How far off the edge of the table can we reach by stacking n identical blocks of length 1 ? J.G. Coffin – Problem 3009, American Mathematical Monthly (1923). “Real-life” 3D version. Idealized 2D version. The classical solution.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Mike Paterson Uri Zwick' - quito

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Mike PatersonUri Zwick

How far off the edge of the table can we reach by stacking n identical blocks of length 1?

J.G. Coffin – Problem 3009, American Mathematical Monthly (1923).

“Real-life” 3D version

Idealized 2D version

Using n blocks we can get an overhang of

Harmonic Piles

Obviously not!

Unstable!

The 4-diamond is stable

The 5-diamond is …

The 5-diamond isUnstable!

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

Force equation

F1 + F2 + F3 = F4 + F5

Moment equation

x1 F1+ x2 F2+ x3 F3 = x4 F4+ x5 F5

Assumption: No friction.All forces are vertical.

Equivalent sets of forces

1

3

Stability

Definition: A stack of blocks is stable iff there is an admissible set of forces under which each block is in equilibrium.

F5

F6

F2

F4

F3

F1

F8

F11

F12

F7

F10

F9

F14

F13

F15

F16

Equivalent to the feasibilityof a set of linear inequalities:

F17

F18

A feasible solution of the primal system gives a set of stabilizing forces.

A feasible solution of the dual system describes an infinitesimal motion that decreases the potential energy.

Overhang = 1.16789

Blocks = 7

Overhang = 1.53005

Blocks = 6

Overhang = 1.4367

Blocks = 5

Overhang = 1.30455

Small optimal stacks

Overhang = 2.1909

Blocks = 16

Overhang = 2.14384

Blocks = 19

Blocks = 18

Overhang = 2.27713

Overhang = 2.23457

Small optimal stacks

Principalblock

Balancing set

Support set

Balancing set

Principalblock

Support set

Stacks with downward external forces acting on them

Principalblock

Size= number of blocks + sum of external forces.

Support set

Stacks in which the support set contains only one block at each level

Principalblock

Support set

Loaded stacks are slightly more powerful.

Conjecture: The difference is bounded by a constant.

Optimality condition:

Let S(n) be the maximal overhang achievable using a spinal stack with n blocks.

Let S*(n) be the maximal overhang achievable using a loaded spinal stack on total weight n.

Theorem:

Conjecture:

A factor of 2 improvement over harmonic stacks!

Towers

Spine

No!

Support set is not spinal!

Blocks = 20

Overhang = 2.32014

Weight = 100

Blocks = 47

Overhang = 4.20801

5-stack

Number of blocks:

Overhang:

Stable!

Using n blocks we can get an overhang of (n1/3) !!!

An exponential improvementover theO(log n)overhang of spinal stacks !!!

5-slab

4-slab

3-slab

r-slab

5-slab

r-slab

5-slab

r-slab

5-slab

Weight = 1151.76

Blocks = 1043

Overhang = 10

Weight = 115467.

Blocks = 112421

Overhang = 50

Weight = 1112.84

Blocks = 921

Overhang = 10

• Is the (n1/3) construction tight?

Yes! Shown recently by Paterson-Peres-Thorup-Winkler-Zwick

• What is the asymptotic shape of “vases”?

• What is the asymptotic shape of “oil lamps”?

• What is the gap between brick-wall constructionsand general constructions?

• What is the gap between loaded stacks and standard stacks?