1 / 10

ALIGNMENT ISSUES FOR RICH 2

ALIGNMENT ISSUES FOR RICH 2. Alignment in RICH2. Angular Resolution for RICH 2 (in TR): 0.35 mrad Emission point: 0.21 mrad Chromatic: 0.22 mrad Pixel size: 0.18 mrad RICH 2 prototype resolutions: obtained with alignments < 0.1 mrad 2048 pixel HPD: 0.18 mrad 61 pixel HPD: 0.26 mrad

quito
Download Presentation

ALIGNMENT ISSUES FOR RICH 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ALIGNMENT ISSUES FOR RICH 2

  2. Alignment in RICH2 • Angular Resolution for RICH 2 (in TR): 0.35 mrad • Emission point: 0.21 mrad • Chromatic: 0.22 mrad • Pixel size: 0.18 mrad • RICH 2 prototype resolutions: obtained with alignments < 0.1 mrad • 2048 pixel HPD: 0.18 mrad • 61 pixel HPD: 0.26 mrad • MAPMT: 0.27 mrad • Experimental aim: alignment to less than 0.1 mrad

  3. CURRENT PHILOSOPHY • Mirrors: • Install mirrors on mirror support planes • Survey positions of mirrors with CERN surveyors • Adjust all positions in laboratory • Carry support plane into pit • Install on structure and “hope” mirrors did not move • Survey frames with mirrors w.r.t. structure • Photon Detectors • Detectors surveyed within support structure • Install on structure • Survey photon detectors w.r.t. structure • Data to link detectors, mirrors and frame • Our conclusion: risky strategy

  4. Alignment with data • Mirror segmentation of both planes of mirrors complicates problem considerably. • Possible sources of error: tilt angle, tilt orientation and radius of curvature • Between 5-10% of photons have ambiguity in finding mirror segment of origin • Compare difference in reconstructed tilt angles for unambiguous photons (F. Filthaud, 19 March 1999) qcrec- qcexp = A cos (fc- f0) • Frank’s conclusion: if relative alignment ~ 0.5 mrad then alignment accuracy of 0.2 mrad (including mirror quality) can be achieved with data • Study needs to be verified. • Is this accuracy sufficient?

  5. Laser Alignment System • A laser alignment system simplifies the problem: • No ambiguous photons • Position of laser beam is known precisely • Allows possibility of performing a first alignment run once mirrors and detectors are installed and modifying mirror tilts (if needed) before closing vessel • It can be used to monitor the alignment during data taking and make corrections if needed (temperature and vibrational stability can modify relative positions) • Complements a final alignment with reconstructed Cherenkov rings.

  6. Array of optic fibers • Single mode fibers coupled to silicon laser (690 nm) • Collimating optics: Gaussian beam profile 2-3 mm over 10 m distance • Used for laser alignment ATLAS muon system

  7. Optic fibers on mirrors • Alternatively, mount optic fibers with collimators on spherical mirrors • Four points per mirror have to be mapped out on photon detector plane • Possible mechanical problem: ensure optic fibers parallel to surface of mirrors

  8. Array of Mirrors • Incident laser light from side of RICH 2 • Array of semi-transparent mirrors to redirect beam • Tube around beam pipe can also be used to reflect alignment beams

  9. Mirror with piezoelectric device • A piezoelectric device on a mirror can scan horizontally and vertically the mirror surfaces • Shadows on the photon detector planes identify edges of mirrors

  10. Conclusions • Current alignment philosophy for RICH 2 is deemed to be “risky” • Alignment with data would only achieve ~0.2 mrad if survey accurate to 0.5 mrad (to be confirmed) • It would be desirable to have some laser alignment system in place for pre-alignment in pit and during-run monitoring of alignment • Possible options suggested: • Arrays of fibers delivering laser light (in front of mirrors or mounted on mirrors). • Arrays of mirrors with laser injected laterally • Mirror with piezoelectric device to scan beam on mirrors • Other ideas welcome!

More Related