300 likes | 390 Views
Explore economic models in decision-making markets with scarcity, opportunity costs, and the interplay of supply and demand for haircuts. Learn how factors influence buyer and seller decisions, equilibrium, and the concept of opportunity cost in resource allocation.
E N D
Chapter 1. Appendix • Using models • scarcity & opportunity costs • decision-making in markets
With scarcity, must choose Economic system decides • what to produce? • how to produce? • for whom to produce?
who decides? • households, firms and government • decisions coordinated by markets • buyers and sellers meet • market set price that rations scarce resources
Using models • simplification of reality • better understand how something works • to use: • make assumptions • apply them to a framework • look at implications
if model is too simple • implications are not helpful • if model is too complicated • no implications • models are only as good as their assumptions
A model of markets • market for haircuts • model behavior of buyers • Demand • model the behavior of sellers • Supply • buyers & sellers determine quantity & price
Market • haircuts in CNY per week • what factors affect buyer decisions? • price of haircuts • income • population • fashion • price of substitutes
what factors affect sellers decisions? • price of haircuts • costs of haircuts • profitability of alternative business
Assume: • first look at relationship between quantity and price • hold other factors constant • men and women do not differ in buying decision • men and women not viewed differently by sellers
Demand • relationship between • quantity of haircuts demanded • price of haircuts • as price rises, Qd falls • holding other factors constant • Law of Demand
Demand schedule P Qd $30 15,000 $20 20,000 $10 25,000
Supply • relationship between • quantity of haircuts supplied • price of haircuts • as price rises, Qs rises • holding other factors constant • Law of Supply
Supply schedule P Qs $30 25,000 $20 20,000 $10 15,000
the market • supply and demand together • graph each schedule
P $30 $20 $10 D S Q haircuts 15K 20K 25K P = $20 Q = 20K
equilibrium • P=$20, Q=20,000 • Qs = Qd • with other factors constant, P & Q will stay at this point
Allow factors to change • CNY population increases • more people, • more haircuts demanded at every price • increase in demand
P $20 D’ D S Q haircuts 20K D increases: P increases Q increases
Allow factors to change • NY increases fee for cosmetology license • more costly to provide haircuts • fewer haircuts supplied • decrease in supply
P $20 S’ D S Q haircuts 20K S decreases: P increases Q decreases
Men vs. women & haircuts • assume sellers view women’s haircuts as more costly • at any price, sellers willing to provide fewer haircuts for women than for men • Women’s supply curve to the left of men’s supply curve
P S women D S men Q haircuts Women’s haircuts have a higher price
assume women are less price sensitive to haircuts than men • price increase causes small decrease in Qd • women’s demand for haircuts is less elastic than men’s • women’s demand curve is steeper than men’s
P D men S D women Q haircuts Women’s haircuts have a higher price
is this discrimination? • some laws forbid different prices for men vs. women • haircuts • drycleaning • is this fair? • is this efficient?
A model of opportunity cost • NY receives $40 million from Feds • use on combo of 2 projects • prison cells $10,000 each • SUNY student unions $4 million each
prisons 4000 student unions 10 graph all possible combos: any point on the line is efficient, using all $40 million any point inside the line is inefficient, using less than $40 million any point above the line is not possible, using more than $40 million
opportunity cost • choice between prison cells and student unions • if want 10 student unions, must give up all prisons cells • every 1 student union costs us 400 prison cells
opp. cost of 1 student union = lost benefits from not having 400 more prisons cells
NY state budget • many choices for spending AND raising revenue • whatever the choice, • something is given up -- some program not funded or -- private spending lost to taxes