1 / 42

Learning Unit 3

The Market Environment. Learning Unit 3. Outcomes. Why must managers understand the market environment? Discuss Porter’s 5 forces model Different structures in industry. AKA Task Environment. Uncontrollable. Change constantly. Substitutes pose a threat to existing products.

questa
Download Presentation

Learning Unit 3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Market Environment Learning Unit 3

  2. Outcomes • Why must managers understand the market environment? • Discuss Porter’s 5 forces model • Different structures in industry

  3. AKA Task Environment Uncontrollable Change constantly Substitutes pose a threat to existing products New competitors enter Change = Threat or Opportunity

  4. Why must managers understand the market environment? • Helps to define the competing arena. • Focus attention on competitors. • Help determine key factors for success. • Helps to be pro-active when changes occur. • Helps to identify opportunities and threats.

  5. Characteristics of market environment • Within immediate business environment. • Uncontrollable. • Can be influenced.

  6. Porter’s 5-Force Model • Forces impact market environment. • Explains structures of industry. • Different profit potential. • 5 Forces that determine industry structure: • Competitors • Customers • Suppliers • Substitute products • Possible new entrants

  7. Porter's Five Forces Model Industry competitors Source: Michael E. Porter Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, (The Free Press, 1980)

  8. Porter's Five Forces Model Potential entrants Threat of new entrants Industry competitors Rivalry among existing firms Source: Michael E. Porter Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, (The Free Press, 1980)

  9. Porter's Five Forces Model Potential entrants Threat of new entrants Industry competitors Rivalry among existing firms Threat of substitutes Substitute products Source: Michael E. Porter Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, (The Free Press, 1980)

  10. Porter's Five Forces Model Potential entrants Threat of new entrants Industry competitors Rivalry among existing firms Bargaining power of suppliers Suppliers Threat of substitutes Substitute products Source: Michael E. Porter Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, (The Free Press, 1980)

  11. Porter's Five Forces Model Potential entrants Threat of new entrants Industry competitors Rivalry among existing firms Bargaining power of suppliers Bargaining power of buyers Suppliers Buyers Threat of substitutes Substitute products Source: Michael E. Porter Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, (The Free Press, 1980)

  12. Competitors • SA free market economy  Competitive market environment • Comply to legal requirements = Compete in specific industry • Experience fierce competition in SA • Highest market share • Compete to acquire scarce resources • Competition for skilled labour – Very fierce! • Extreme Salaries!

  13. Coca-Cola and Pepsi 2009 Market Share

  14. Advantage of healthy competition • Lower prices • Better quality products • Organisation more productive • Motivate to continuously improve • Encourage regular introduction of new products

  15. Competition • Action  Reaction Come Thirsty Come Hungry

  16. Competition • Government role: • Fair competition • No monopoly • Competition commission • Don’t abuse dominant positions

  17. Competition Commission Press Release 11 May 2010 Computicket to face exclusionary conduct charges in Tribunal The Competition Commission has referred a case of exclusionary conduct against Computicket to the Competition Tribunal for adjudication. This case relates to the provision of outsourced ticket distribution services for entertainment events. This referral follows five complaints that were lodged by Strictly Tickets CC, Soundalite CC (trading as Artslink), KZN Entertainment News and Reviews CC (trading as Going Places), L Square Technologies CC (trading as TicketSpace), and Ezimidlalo Technologies CC. These complaints were lodged during the period 2008/2009, and for purposes of investigation the Commission combined them, as they raised overlapping issues. With a market share exceeding 95%, the Commission identified that Computicket is dominant in the market for outsourced ticketing services for entertainment events including theatres, festivals and live events. In its investigation the Commission found that Computicket entered into long term exclusive contracts with theatre owners, theatre producers, promoters’ and festival event organizers in the entertainment industry, preventing them from using any other ticketing provider. These contracts are predominantly for a period of three years, and have the effect of excluding Computicket’s rivals, with a harmful effect on consumers. This is alleged to have taken place from around 1999 to date. “Computicket’s exclusive contracts prevent rivals from entering the market thereby reducing choice and convenience for consumers. As a result the commission and fees that it charges for its services are higher than they would have been in a competitive market,” said Commissioner Shan Ramburuth. The Commission has asked the tribunal to levy an administrative penalty of 10 percent on Computicket’s 2009 turnover and to declare the exclusivity clauses in its contracts with inventory providers as void and of no force or effect.

  18. Customer • AKA market & buyers • All individuals with the need for an organisations G&S • Ability to pay for the G&S • CONFLICT! • Organisation = Maximum profit • Customer = Highest quality lowest price

  19. Customer • Know who your customer is! • Age • Gender • Marital Status • Size of their families • Literate or not • Purchasing power and buyer behaviour.

  20. Customer • Design G&S to satisfy unique needs. • Market research!

  21. Customer • Large bargaining power  Force prices down • Bargain for higher quality • Play suppliers against each other

  22. Do no mislead! • False or misleading advertising

  23. 03 Aug 2010 Mr Read lodged a consumer complaint against a Vodacom print advertisement appearing in the Sunday Times during May 2010.The advertisement promotes the respondent’s broadband offerings and contains, inter alia, the wording “GET UP TO 60% MORE INTERNET, NEWS, EMAIL, MUSIC AND SPORT. NOW AT THE FASTEST BROADBAND SPEED AVAILABLE. Vodacom introduces up to 60% extra data at the fastest available broadband speed … what’s more, our network is now 14.4 HSDPA enabled. That’s more Internet for the entire family … Go to www.vodacom.co.za to view Broadband data offers not included above … More exiting Vodacom Broadband offers coming soon!”COMPLAINTIn essence, the complainant submitted that the advertisement is misleading as broadband is “generally taken to mean over 32KBps”, whereas Vodacom “consistently deliver less than 20KBps”.

  24. Given the above:The general reference to broadband must be withdrawn; The process to withdraw such general reference to broadband must be auctioned with immediate effect on receipt of this ruling; The withdrawal of such general reference to broadband must be completed within the deadlines stipulated by Clause 15.3 of the Procedural Guide; The general reference to broadband may not be used again until new substantiation has been submitted, evaluated, and a new ruling is made.

  25. Suppliers Organisation dependent on suppliers! • Limited resources  Produce G&S • Organisation Resources  Suppliers RIGHT QUANTITY RIGHT PRICES Competitive in the Market

  26. Supplier: Examples

  27. Suppliers Influence organisation  Price or  Quality Negative impact on organisation profitability

  28. Substitute products • Product from different industry • Satisfies same need • As same product in industry

  29. Substitute products • Advantage for consumers: • Limit on prices charged • Change to substitute: • Cost • Quality • Time • Minimise threat of substitute products: • Differentiate through quality, service, brand, etc.

  30. Possible new entrants Same Industry • Influence on market: •  Market share • Loss in revenue •  ROI Different Industry

  31. New Entrants Barriers to entry = Seriousness of threat! How difficult to enter an industry And be competitive

  32. High Produce large volumes @ low cost Low

  33. Industry Structures • Industry: • Group of Organisations • Offer goods and services • Similar/close substitutes • Different industry  Different structure  Different customer, supplier, profit potential To outwit = Understand industry structure + Unique characteristics

  34. Dominated by few organisations

More Related