What is peer-review of a manuscript? benefits of peer-reviewing a manuscript - Pubrica

1. WHAT IS PEER-REVIEW OF AMANUSCRIPT. LIST OUT THE BENEFITS OF PEER- REVIEWING A MANUSCRIPT An Academic presentationby Dr.NancyAgnes,Head,TechnicalOperations,Pubrica Group: www.pubrica.com Email:sales@pubrica.com

2. Today'sDiscussion Outline In-Brief Introduction Manuscript Should Also Include Methodology Benefits of Peer-reviewing a Manuscript Conclusion

3. In-Brief Peer review is the critical assessment of manuscripts submitted to journals by experts who are usually not part of the editorial staff. “The investigator’s final manuscript of a peer-reviewed article accepted for journal publication, including all modifications from the peer reviewprocess.”

4. Peer review can be described as a process in which a person reads, checks and gives his or her opinion ona piece of work written by another scientist orexpert working in the samefield. Generally speaking, two forms of peer review can be distinguished: ‘in-class peer review’ for undergraduate students and academic peer review’ forresearchscholars. During an in-class peer review, undergraduate students read articles written by fellow classmates and offer inputon their work as part of the teaching aspects of theprogram. Contd.. Introduction

5. Academic peer review (hereafter “peers review”) is, on the contrary, amore complicated process.Peer reviewis a central aspect of academicstudy. Authors were submitting a manuscript outlining their findings, editors determining whether the paper will be offered for peer review and eventually accepted for publication, and peer reviewers performing evaluations that will allow the editorto make a better-informed decision onsuitability. These reviewers play an understated yet crucial role in the process, utilizingtheir capability to constructively critique a piece of work for the benefit of thebroader scientific community.

6. Manuscript ShouldAlso Include Figures, charts, tables andimages Supplemental materials associated with thework Titlepage Names and affiliations of theauthors The corresponding author’s name and emailaddress Grant awardacknowledgements Contd..

8. To gain insight into the attitudes towards the participation of ecrs in peer review, we havedistributed a survey to academics in ten countries across theglobe. The survey covered numerous aspects of the peer review process, including how many peer-review invites are commonly accepted by academics, if they included ecrs postgraduate researchers only in theirevaluations, and if so, what was their motivation to involveecrs. We requested that academics determine the effectof peer review on the essential skills of their students based on their previousexperience. Contd.. Methodology

9. Besides, a separate survey was distributed to the ecrs (student survey) toassess their attitudes towards peer review participation. Complete details of survey questions for both the academic and the ecr surveyscan be found in the supplementary materialssection. For the survey, terminology graduate students (pgrs) is used instead ofecrs (supplementarymaterials). It was to be differentiated explicitly from undergraduate researchers who werenot the subject of ourstudy.

10. Benefitsof Peer- reviewing aManuscript CORRECTS VAGUETERMS While i use an online thesaurus every time i writeto find the right word to describe a concept, in some cases, some words seem to be incorrect orvague. Having input from peers lets me determine whether i have to adhere to my terms or consider what theysay. I do not hesitate to alter the words in question ifthe idea soundsfine. Contd..

11. PROVIDES FEEDBACK AS TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF YOURCOMMUNICATION If grasped the points you advanced in your manuscript, you can readily see fromthe reactions of your peergroup. Suppose that after a page has been displayed to provide their input, it takes thema little longer than expected, which will possibly mean that something is wrong withthe flow of thinking orconversation. Questions for clarity will most likely come next. And yes, theyhave. Contd..

12. PREVENTS YOU FROM COMMITTING SERIOUS BLUNDERS IN YOURARGUMENTS You may have made points that may be based on incorrectassumptions. Once the beliefs are false, then everything you’ve published iswrong. This result observes the laws oflogic. If the premises are defective, so it is unreliable with anything that goes beyondit. FACILITATES CONCISE WRITING More than what is required, you might havewritten. Contd..

13. The elimination here and there of needless paragraphs or phrases gives rise toa short, adequatelywritten manuscript. Some people are fond of focusing on spelling and grammaticalmistakes. While attention should be given to the substance or claims of your researchpaper, your grammar matters alot. As the reading flow is made more efficient, good grammar encouragesreading. ALLOWS YOU TO EXPOUND ON YOURPOINTS Perhaps you felt you had written sufficiently to clarify the matter athand. Contd..

14. Then you know that you have brought your peers halfway to theexpected ideas you want toproject. This situation requires clarification on the questions you have raisedto understand and illustrateconcepts. ENCOURAGES YOU TO PERFORM BETTER NEXTTIME The next time you are on the watch for the possible comments,suggestions, or criticism of your book, if the peer review exercise has shown you any positivefeedback. Contd..

15. When you add all the terms and recommendations of colleagues, you will then compose better thanever. Thus in your previous article, you stop making the sameerrors. There are tremendous advantages topeer-review.

16. Conclusion In conclusion, the method of peer-reviewis collegialat its best, notadversarial. Finally, when guided by attentive, detailed, insightful reviews, and they have the privilege of seeing papers and journal reputations improve as part of theprocess, editors gain trust in their decisions to accept anarticle.

17. ContactUs UNITEDKINGDOM +44-1143520021 INDIA +91-9884350006 EMAIL sales@pubrica.com