1 / 9

Narrative review | Systematic review | Data extraction

When conducting a systematic review of prospective cohort studies, itu2019s crucial to extract relevant data from the included studies in a consistent and structured manner. Here are some variables to consider when creating a data extraction form for your systematic review.<br>Visit us @ https://pubrica.com/services/medical-data-collection/

pubrica
Download Presentation

Narrative review | Systematic review | Data extraction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What are the Variables used in data extraction for prospective cohort studies in a systematic review? An Academic presentation by Dr. Nancy Agnes, Head, Technical Operations, Pubrica Group: www.pubrica.com Email: sales@pubrica.com

  2. Data extraction is an important stage in systematic reviews because it captures critical study features in an organized and consistent format. • It is required for analyzing bias risk and synthesizing results. Interventional, diagnostic, and prognostic reviews take data from predetermined fields such as population, intervention, comparison, and results. Data extraction by hand can be time-consuming and repetitive, but intelligent software allows for automatic identification and medical data collection. • This semi-automation integrates with EBM and data science, and interest in its research is expanding alongside AI in other computer science domains.

  3. INTRODUCTION • A data-extraction form based on crucial factors to prognosis to analyze the features of reviews and primary research was designed and is accessible on request from the first author. • Before the form was finished, it was pilot-tested by all review writers, and small changes were made following a discussion of the disparities in scores. One narrative review author rated all reviews, while others scored all reviews collectively. • Consensus sessions were convened within two weeks of the review's completion to resolve differences. A third reviewer was consulted to make the ultimate judgment if an agreement could not be achieved. contd...

  4. An item was rated 'yes' if positive information on that specific methodological item was discovered, for example, if it was obvious that sensitivity analyses were performed. • If it was evident that a certain methodological condition was not met, a 'no' was assigned; for example, no sensitivity analyses were performed. 'Unclear' was scored when there was a question or uncertainty. • A methodological item may be graded as 'not applicable' at times. The proportion and quantity of reviews within each answer category were given. To know more about Medical Data collection Services, check our study guide. What are examples of medical survey data collection?

  5. WHAT IS A DATA EXTRACTION TOOL IN RESEARCH? • A data extraction tool in research is a software or systematic approach designed to gather relevant information from various sources, such as research papers, databases, or surveys. • When conducting a systematic review of prospective cohort studies, it's crucial to extract relevant data from the included studies in a consistent and structured manner. Here are some variables to consider when creating a data extraction form for your systematic review: • Study characteristics: a) Study title b) Authors c) Publication year d) Journal e) Study location (country, region) f) Study design (e.g., prospective cohort) g) Funding sources • Population characteristics: a) Sample size b) Age range or mean age c) Sex distribution d) Ethnicity e) Baseline health status (e.g., healthy, presence of specific conditions) f) Inclusion and exclusion criteria contd...

  6. Exposure or risk factor assessment: a) Definition of exposure or risk factor b) Measurement method (e.g., questionnaire, biomarker) c) Exposure categories or levels d) Frequency or duration of exposure e) Confounding factors considered or adjusted for • Outcome assessment: a) Definition of the outcome(s) of interest b) Measurement method (e.g., self-report, medical records, death certificates) c) Duration of follow-up d) Incidence or prevalence of the outcome(s) in exposed and non-exposed groups e) Loss to follow-up or attrition rate • Results: a) Crude and adjusted effect estimates (e.g., hazard ratios, odds ratios, risk ratios) b) Confidence intervals or standard errors c) Statistical significance (e.g., p-values) d) Subgroup analyses or effect modification, if applicable • Quality assessment: a) Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) score or another quality assessment tool b) Risk of bias assessment, if applicable Check our Medical data collection sample work to know and learn more about, Medical data collection on interstitial cysts and drug uracyst's impact on patient quality of life.

  7. ABOUT PUBRICA • AtPubrica, we collect data from a wide range of sources and perform semantic annotation based on the research questions that you wanted to solve. • Pubrica has the vast majority of the data in doctor's notes; electronic medical records, prescriptions, and similar information are available. • Although therein lies the golden possibility of big data in medical care, it's challenging to yield valuable insights due to complex, unstructured, longitudinal, and voluminous data.

  8. Contact Us UNITED KINGDOM +44 1618186353 INDIA +91-9884350006 EMAIL sales@pubrica.com

More Related