1 / 18

Methodological aspects of medical app evaluation a systematic review – Pubrica

Different significances and motives reveal academics' interest in systematic app assessment over mobile applications.<br>1.tSearch strategy<br>2.tInformation<br>3.tApplication<br>4.tOutcome<br><br>Learn More : https://bit.ly/3BUIJ2S<br>Reference: https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/<br><br>Why Pubrica:<br>When you order our services, we promise you the following u2013 Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Bio statistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.

pubrica
Download Presentation

Methodological aspects of medical app evaluation a systematic review – Pubrica

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Motivations, recommendations, and features of medical app evaluation:aSystematic Review AnAcademicpresentationby Dr.NancyAgnes,Head,TechnicalOperations,Pubrica Group: www.pubrica.com Email:sales@pubrica.com

  2. TODAY'SDISCUSSION Inbrief Introduction Motivations Search strategy Challenges Recommendations Methodologicalaspects Conclusion References

  3. INBRIEF Mobile applications have attracted much attention recently (inthefuture,"apps"). Someoftheseapplicationsaren'tveryuseful, and they don'thavea lotofmaterial, sotheydon'tbenefit end- usersasmuchastheyshould. This study aims to examine and analyse papers related to medicalappevaluationacrossvariousplatforms. Italso attempted to explore academic problems, motives, and suggestions linkedto qualityevaluationsand current bestpracticesinSystematicReviewWriting.

  4. INTRODUCTION Mobileapplicationshaveattracteda lotofattentionin recentyears. Their everyday usage has become established in the lives of peopleworldwide,withestimatesputtingthe numberof appusersatabout2.5billionin2019. Applications builtto runon mobile devices are referred to asmobileapps. Contd...

  5. Because of the rapid adoption of smartphones and other benefits, such as their efficacy,accessibility,andconvenience,notonlyforend-usersbutalsofor developers who are driven to produce apps rather than web-based services to ConductingaSystematicReview. Thequantity and popularity of these applications are rapidly growing. Because oftheirpopularity,apps includea widerange ofcontent,includingbusiness, education,medical,gaming,sports,andmore. Toevaluateappcontent,asystematicorqualityevaluationisrequired. Such evaluations need considerably more than just knowledge and expertise, and theyarefrequentlytime-consumingandtechnicallychallenging. Contd...

  6. Thisisafragmentedprocessthatsometimesnecessitatescontinuoussubjectivity.Thisisafragmentedprocessthatsometimesnecessitatescontinuoussubjectivity. The slow-paced scientific technique for app review, the lack of features that mayassistdiscoverpotentiallybeneficialapplications,andtheshortage of available apps that have been empirically examined are all barriers to app quality evaluations. Pursuingthisassessment domainwas urged forvariousreasons,includingthe quality of information in an app or information for an app, which would assist in creating a quality-based app and the consideration of strategies to ensure the app'squality. Appsthatrequirequalitycontrolandvalidationarealsocalled for inthe literature.

  7. MOTIVATIONS For various scientific reasons, researchers and scholars are drawntotheirrecognisedprofessions. Somepeople areinspiredbytheimportance of themes suchashottrendsinresearch,newideas, and special issuesinscientificjournals. whileothersare interestedinthe advantages the topics may provide, such as treating a sickness, raising awareness, ormakinganycontribution. Differentsignificancesandmotivesrevealacademics' interestinSystematicAppAssessmentovermobile applications.

  8. SEARCHSTRATEGY The content was only chosen based on research publicationsand reviewarticlesduringthesearchand screening processinClinicalTrialSystematicReview Services. Thischoice was judged thebest foridentifyingthemost recent and related items pertinent to the review's assigned topic.

  9. CHALLENGES The most typical academic problems that a researcher may confrontareissuesandconcerns. Whetherornota challengeisdirectlyconnectedtoa researcher's field of interest or has an indirect influence, it necessitatesfurthereffortstoaddressitandprogress scienceinthatdomain. Challenges are dispersed throughout numerous categories for systematic evaluation of mobile applications, and they are grouped based on similar qualities to make them easier tograspforfutureresearchersandstudies.

  10. RECOMMENDATIONS Aresearcher'sperspectiveona specificissuechanges considerablybytheconclusionoftheresearchjourney. Muchinformationwasgathered,andaresearcher's experience increased.Furthermore,oneofthe essential aims for academicians and researchers is to mitigate such concerns and determine what kind of academic message shouldbedeliveredtootherresearchersonthatsubject. Contd...

  11. Asa result, thissectionsummarisesresearchers'workby proposingfuturemobileappevaluationstudies. Thesubsectionrecognisesthreecriticalpoints:content, research, and development, and provides good suggestions toeach.

  12. METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS This section discusses the methodological aspects of prior studiesonmobileapplicationsandtheirevaluation. Variouselementsareexaminedandrecognisedto enlighten future scholars in this field who have used similar settingsandmethodologiesinWritingASystematicReview.

  13. CONCLUSION The numberofstudiesrelatingto mobileapplications continuestorise.However,despitetherelevance of the priordebate,itstillrequiresfurtherassessmentmeasures. Mobileappassessmentisconsideredanemergingand essentialtopic. Thestudy'skeycontributionsincludea comprehensive surveyandclassificationofmobileappevaluationand techniques. Contd...

  14. In the literature, several patterns have been discovered, and the articles thathavebeenrecognisedhavebeendividedintotwogroups. Challenges, reasons, and recommendations fall under the first category relatedtodialogue. The second category is concerned with the methodological elements of appevaluation. Such contributions would help in a better understanding and progression of the subject. Then,different applications were focused on other app evaluationpurposes,andvariousacademicswereinvolved.

  15. ABOUTPUBRICA Pubrica'steamofresearchersandauthors Scientific andmedicalresearchpapersthat indispensabletoolstothepractitioner/authors. develop canbe PubricaMedicalWritersHelpyouwriteandeditthe introduction byintroducingthereadertothe shortcomings or empty spaces in the identified research field. Our experts know the structure that follows the broad topic, the problem, and background and advance to a narrowtopictostatethehypothesis.

  16. REFERENCES Tang AK. A systematic literature review and analysis on mobileapps inm-commerce:implicationsforfuture research.ElectronCommer ResAppl.2019;37:100885. Alamoodi,A.H.,Garfan,S.,Zaidan,B.B.etal. A systematicreviewintotheassessmentofmedicalapps:

  17. ContactUs UNITEDKINGDOM +441618186353 INDIA +91-9884350006 EMAIL sales@pubrica.com

More Related