1 / 22

How To Structure Your Table For Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis – Pubrica

According to the, a systematic review is "a scholarly method in which all empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility requirements is gathered to address a particular research question."<br><br>Continue Reading: https://bit.ly/3AeFIYY<br>For our services: https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/<br>

pubrica
Download Presentation

How To Structure Your Table For Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis – Pubrica

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An Academic presentationby Dr. Nancy Agnes, Head, Technical Operations, Pubrica Group: www.pubrica.com Email:sales@pubrica.com

  2. TODAY'SDISCUSSION Outline In Brief Introduction Need of systemic review andmeta- analysis Phases to planning a systematicreview andmeta-analysis Futurescope Conclusion

  3. INBRIEF According to the, a systematic reviewis "a scholarly method in which all empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility requirements is gathered to address a particular researchquestion." It entails systematically identifying, selecting, synthesising, and evaluating primary research studies to produce a high-quality summary of a subject while addressing a pre-specified researchquestion. A meta-analysis is a step forward from a systematic review in that it employs mathematical and statistical methods to summarise the results of studies included in the systematicreview

  4. INTRODUCTION In some aspects, systematic reviewsvary from conventional narrativereviews. Narrative reviews are mostly descriptive, do not require a systematic search of the literature, and concentrate on a subset of studies in a field selected based on availability or authorpreference. As a result, although narrative reviews are element of informative, they often include an selectionbias. Contd...

  5. As the name implies, systematic reviews usually include a thorough and comprehensive plan and search strategy derived a priori to minimise bias by finding, evaluating, and synthesising all related studies on a givensubject. A meta-analysis aspect is often used in systematic reviews, which entails using statistical techniques to synthesise data from several studies into a single quantitative estimation or summary effectsize. It is a well-known and well-respected multinational non-profit organisation that promotes, funds, and disseminates systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effectiveness of healthcareinterventions

  6. NEED OFSYSTEMIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS There are several reasons for performing a systematic review andmeta-analysis: It may assist in resolving discrepancies in results published by individual studies that may include bias orerrors. Contd...

  7. It may help identify areas in a field where there is a lack of evidence and areas where further research should beconducted. It allows the combination of findings from different studies, highlighting new findings relevant to practice orpolicy. It may be able to reduce the need for additionaltrials. Writinga systematic reviewand meta-analysis will help identify a researcher's field ofinterest since they are published in high-impact journals and receive manycitations Contd...

  8. PHASES TO PLANNING ASYSTEMATIC REVIEW ANDMETA-ANALYSIS The succeeding components to a successful systematic review andmeta-analysis writingare FORMULATE THE REVIEW QUESTION The first stage involves describing the review topic, formulating hypotheses, and developing a title for thereview. It's usually best to keep titles as short and descriptive as possible by following this formula: Intervention for those with a disease (e.g., Dialectical behaviour therapy for adolescent females with a borderline personalitydisorder). Contd...

  9. Since reviews published in other outlets do not need to be listed as such, they should state in the title that they are a systematic review andmeta-analysis. DEFINE INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA The PICO (or PICOC) acronym stands for population, intervention, comparison, outcomes (andcontext). It can help ensure that all main components are decided upon before beginning thestudy. Authors must, for example, choose their population age range, circumstances, results, and type(s) of interventions and control groups apriori. Contd...

  10. It's also crucial to determine what types of experiments to include and exclude (e.g., RCTs only, RCTs and quasi-experimental designs, qualitative research), the minimum number of participants in each group, published and unpublished studies, and languagerestrictions. DEVELOP A SEARCH STRATEGY AND LOCATESTUDIES This is where a reference librarian can be particularly beneficial in assisting with the creation and execution of electronicsearches. To recognise all applicable trials in a given region, it is essential to create a detailed list of key terms (i.e., "MeSH" terms) related to each component ofPICOC. The secret to creating an effective search strategy is to strike a balance between sensitivity andprecision. Contd...

  11. SELECTION OF STUDIES After retrieving and reviewing a detailed list of abstracts, any studies that tend to satisfy inclusion requirements will be collected and thoroughly reviewed. To ensure inter-rater reliability, this procedure is usually carried out by at least tworeviewers. Contd...

  12. It is suggested that authors maintain a list of all checked research, including reasons for inclusion orexclusion. It might be possible to hire study authors to collect missing data for data pooling (e.g., means, standard deviations). It's also possible that translations will beneeded. Contd...

  13. EXTRACTDATA To organise the information extracted from each reviewed study (e.g., authors, publication year, number of participants, age range, study design, results, included/excluded), building and using a basic data extraction type or chart can bebeneficial. Data extractionby at least two reviewers is necessary to ensure inter-rater reliability and prevent data entryerrors. Contd...

  14. Table: 1 outline for systemic review andmeta-analysis

  15. ASSESS STUDYQUALITY In recent years, there has been a push to improve the consistency of each RCT included in systematicreviews. Double-blinding, which is acceptable for clinical trials but not for psychologicalor non-pharmacological treatments, significantly impacts thismetric. Other more detailed guidelines and criteria, such as the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT), as well as articles with recommendations for improving quality in RCTs and meta-analyses for psychological intervention, are available Contd...

  16. ANALYSE AND INTERPRET RESULTS The Review Manager (RevMan) software, endorsed by the Cochrane Collaboration, is one example of a statistical programme that can measureeffect sizes for meta-analyses The effect sizes are given, along with a 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) range, and are presented in both quantitative and graphical form (e.g., forest plots). Each trial is visually represented as a horizontal diamond shape in forest plots. The middle represents the effect size (e.g., SMD) and the endpoints representing both ends of theCI. Contd...

  17. DISSEMINATEFINDINGS Since the Cochrane Collaboration's reviews are published they are often lengthy and in the online Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, comprehensive. As a result, it is possible and encouraged to publish abbreviated versions of the review in other applicable scholarly journals; indeed, engaging in a review update or joining a well-established review team may be a beneficial way to get involved in the systematic reviewprocess.

  18. FUTURESCOPE The systematic review's findings should be discussed in terms of the strength shortcomings of evidence of the initial and research used for thereview. It's also necessary to discuss the review's weaknesses, the results' applicability (generalizability), and the findings' implications for patient care, public health, and futureclinical research.

  19. CONCLUSION The steps of a systematic review/meta- analysis include developing a research question and validating it, forming criteria, searching databases, importing all results to a library and exporting to an excel sheet, protocol writing and registration, title and abstract screening, full-text screening, manual searching, extracting data and assessing its quality, data checking, and conductingstatistics. Contd...

  20. The PRISMA or Meta-analysis must be used to write up the systematic study and meta-analysis. This is a reporting checklist for systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses that specifies what information should be included in each portion of a high-quality systematicreview

  21. CONTACTUS UNITEDKINGDOM +44-7424810299 INDIA +91-9884350006 EMAIL sales@pubrica.com

More Related