180 likes | 276 Views
Explore effective literacy strategies, assessment data, and growth areas. Enhance reading fluency and comprehension with common strategies for student success. Review successes and identify areas for improvement.
E N D
VOISE Academy 2008-2009 Literacy Initiative Overview Revised Summer ’09
Data • Freshmen Watch List • Fluency Snapshot • Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test • EXPLORE Test • Survey Monkey (Apex, climate, literacy) • Samples of student work • CPS Dashboard
Professional Development • Peer observations • Modeled lessons • Looking at student work • Reading strategies • SMART Goals
Instruction/Common Strategies Vocabulary (semantic mapping, knowledge rating, C(2)QU) Comprehension (text structures, internet literacy) Post-reading (applying knowledge)
Expected Outcomes • Use of common strategies will allow students to transfer knowledge and skills between classes. • Our data will evidence an increase in skills, attitude, and grades.
Successes • Wednesday PD was used to introduce and model strategies in 1st semester. • All teachers have implemented at least one vocabulary and one comprehension strategy. • Debriefing on use of common strategies is taking place in content area groups (PLCs?) during Wednesday PD.
Areas for Growth • Need for systematic collection of samples of student work (reading specialist). • Clear, common expectations and deadlines for use of common strategies (administration). • Scheduling of in-class literacy coaching with post-conferences (teachers). • Decodingissues must be addressed (reading specialist/special education).
Questions for Consideration • Are students being confronted with enough accessible text in all content areas??? (quantity of reading) • Is our curriculum culturally relevant for our students? Do students find content engaging?? Would use of essential questions help???
Definition of Reading Fluency • Oral reading done accurately, with appropriate speed, expression, and phrasing. • “Comprehension requires the fluent mastery of the surface-level aspects of reading.” • “The link between fluency and overall reading proficiency is now well established.” Rasinski, T.V. (2006). A Brief History of Reading Fluency. In S.J. Samuels and A.E. Farstrup (Eds.), What Research Has to Say About Fluency Instruction (p. 18). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Fluency from Fall to Winter n=124 (pre and post data) Increase of 10+ CWPM=55 students (44%) Decrease of 10+ CWPM=14 students (11%)
Fluency Growth Chart for___________ Correct Words Per Minute 5 10 15 # of errors KEY C.W.P.M.=_______ Errors=---------------- Recall=poor, fair, good, excellent
Application of Fluency Snapshot • Who can you call on to read-aloud or model in class (your ringers) • Who should be partnered with who • Who should or should not be using the “read” function on Apex • Who will require modifications or accommodations with reading assignments • Who needs more testing or intervention
This snapshot does nottell us— • Who is reading on grade-level (Stanford Reading Diagnostic does) • Anything about writing ability • Anything about motivation • What their “instructional” reading level is
Comprehension Data Explore Reading Scores and Stanford Reading Diagnostic Results—Fall Stanford Reading Diagnostic Results --Spring