530 likes | 925 Views
Speakers. Quentin Collard, M.D.Bootin-Savrick PediatricsToi Harris, M.D.TCH Psychiatry-Psychology Consultation Liaison. Goals of Presentation. Highlight Common Features of Somatoform DisordersReview Conceptual Framework/Theories Describing Somatoform DisordersIdentify Challenges Associated
E N D
1. Somatoform Disorders in Children and AdolescentsTexas Children’s HospitalToi Blakley Harris, M.D.Quentin Collard, M.D.January 27, 2009
2. Speakers Quentin Collard, M.D.
Bootin-Savrick Pediatrics
Toi Harris, M.D.
TCH Psychiatry-Psychology Consultation Liaison
3. Goals of Presentation Highlight Common Features of Somatoform Disorders
Review Conceptual Framework/Theories Describing Somatoform Disorders
Identify Challenges Associated with Diagnosis and Treatment Process in the primary care setting
5. How Common Is This??? Physical symptoms without medical explanation Historical Names Functional
Psychogenic
Non-organic
Hysterical
Medically unexplained symptoms (MUPS)
Question #1Question #1
6. Epidemiology/Prevalence Psychological disorders in pediatric chronically ill patients
2-4 times general population
7. Epidemiology/Prevalence Ontario Child Health Study (recurrent distressing somatic complaints 12-16 year-olds)
11% females
4% males
50% preschool-school age children reported at least 1 somatic complaint in 2 weeks
15% reported 4 symptoms in 2 weeks
8. Epidemiology/Prevalence 3 month prevalence chronic pain
25% prevalence
50% took medications to treat pain
40% sought medical attention for pain
9. Pediatric Somatic Complaints Headaches: most common across children and adolescents
10-30% once per week
1-2% ambulatory visits
Functional abdominal pain: most common in younger children
7-25% school age
2-4% ambulatory visits
Polysymptomatic symptoms: adolescents Other stats?Other stats?
10. Long-term 1/3-1/2 children with FAP have symptoms in adulthood
4 year olds with stomach pain
3 times more likely to c/o 10 years v. peers
11. Somatic Conditions Functional Abdominal Pain (FAP)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome: FAP with at least 2
Relief with defecation, change in bowel frequency or character
Fibromyalgia
2 months of multiple musculoskeletal pains and pain to palpitation on PE in at least 11/18 tender point sites
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome I.
Reflex sympathetic dystrophy
After immobilization or trauma
Pain in excess
Edema, change in blood flow or temperature
12. Continued Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Severe fatigue > 6 months
Impaired Concentration, Memory, Sleep, and Musculoskeletal pains
Vocal Cord Dysfunction
Vocal cord spasm mimics asthma
Adduction of vocal cords on laryngoscope
Localized wheezing throat and upper chest
Normal blood gases with symptoms
13. Continuum Somatic symptoms---Somatoform Disorder
14. Somatoform Disorders in DSM IV-TR (2000) Somatization Disorder
Conversion Disorder
Hypochondriasis
Body Dysmorphic Disorder*
Pain Disorder*
Undifferentiated Somatoform Disorder*
Somatoform Disorder, NOS*
15. Somatoform Disorders Common features
Presence of physical symptoms suggesting an underlying medical condition, but the medical condition either is not found or does not fully account for the level of functional impairment
Represent the severe end of a continuum which includes unexplained ‘functional symptoms in the middle and transient, every day aches and pains at the other end
Diagnostic criteria were established for adults; there is no child-specific research base or developmentally appropriate diagnostic classification
Symptoms are not intentionally produced, as are those of malingering and factitious disorder (Munchausen’s and MBP/Medical Child abuse).
16. Common Clinical Questions Is she/he “faking it?”
When to discharge?: I can’t take them home like this!
When to treat?
When to refer?
17. K.H. 19 year-old 15 year old presented in 2007 with 2 year history of abdominal pain and weight loss
H/O extensive GI work up
18. Somatization Disorder: 4-2-1-1 DSM-IV criteria require at least 4 pain symptoms, 2 GI symptoms, 1 sexual symptom, and 1 pseudoneurological symptom
Diagnosis is rare in childhood and adolescence
Revised criteria for these age groups are needed
Associated with Anxiety, Depressive Disorders; Conduct Disorder and Substance abuse
Differential: Physical disease, Depression and Anxiety
Prognosis: Poor to fair
19. Body Dysmorphic Disorder Preoccupation with an imagined or slight defect in physical appearance causing significant distress or impairment in functioning
Patients often experience significant shame and will not volunteer their concerns
10% of a recent case series <18y
May need to be a consideration for plastic surgeons
Anorexia Nervosa, OCD, Avoidant /Compulsive personality traits
Differential: Delusional psychosis, Depression, Somatization, normal adolescence
Prognosis: Fair to good Mirror checking; efforts to camouflage;
Mirror checking; efforts to camouflage;
20. Hypochondriasis Persistent, preoccupying fear that one has a serious disease, based on misinterpretation of one or multiple physical symptoms
Fear persists despite appropriate medical work-up and reassurance
Associated with dissatisfaction with care, “doctor shopping,” deteriorating interpersonal relationships and the risk of iatrogenic complications from repeated diagnostic or treatment procedures
Rarely reported in youth; ? because must involve parents in seeking help for medical concerns
Equal male to female ratio
Duration is at least 6 months.
Depression, Panic disorder and OCD associated
Differential: Physical disease, Depression, Delusional disorder
Prognosis is fair to good (intermittent)
21. Conversion Disorder Term conversion derived from the theory that the somatic symptom represented a symbolic resolution of an unconscious conflict, reducing anxiety and serving to keep the conflict out of awareness (“primary gain”)
“Secondary gain” is the external benefits that are obtained or the noxious duties or responsibilities that are avoided by virtue of the symptom
Diagnostic criteria currently require that psychological factors be associated with the onset or exacerbation of symptoms—this etiologic relationship may be very difficult to establish
Determination that a symptom is not intentionally produced may be very difficult to establish
Symptoms include voluntary motor or sensory functions
Subtypes: Motor, Sensory, Seizures/Convulsions, Mixed presentation
22. Conversion Disorder, Continued Drug/alcohol dependence, Somatization disorder, Histrionic personality traits associated
Differential: Depression, Neurological disease
Prognosis: Excellent (unless chronic)
23. Pain Disorder New to DSM-IV
Essential characteristics
Significantly disabling pain in one or more sites
Psychological factors are judged to play a major role in pain’s onset, severity or maintenance
Pain is not feigned, nor part of a mood, anxiety, or psychotic disorder
A general medical condition may or may not interact with psychological factors central to the pain disorder
Includes RAP and RSD
Pain disorder associated with psychological factors
Pain disorder associated with both psychological factors and GMC
Pain disorder associated with a GMC
Acute (< 6 months); Chronic (> 6 months)
Prognosis is guarded; variable
24. Pain Disorder, Continued Depression, Anxiety, Substance use, Dependent/Histrionic personality associated
Differential: Depression, Psychophysiological, Physical disease and Malingering
25. Undifferentiated Somatoform Disorder One or more physical complaints that are not fully accounted for by a medical condition or the effects of a substance
Either (1) or (2):
After investigation, symptoms cannot be explained due to GMC
When there is a related GMC, the physical complaints or resulting social/occupational impairment is in excess
Duration of disturbance is at least six months
Doesn’t meet criteria for Somatization disorder by virtue of duration and number and distribution of symptoms
26. Somatoform Disorder, NOS Doesn’t meet criteria for any other specific somatoform disorder
The most frequently diagnosed somatoform disorder by C/L services in this practice model (tertiary care hospital)
A disorder involving nonpsychotic hypochondriacal symptoms or unexplained physical symptoms of less than 6 months’ duration
27. J.C. 20 year-old Paroxysmal dystonia (1991); tegretol
Congenital Heart Disease (21 months, Tetralogy of Fallot; Stents 1995)
Hospitalized fatigue, syncope multiple times
ADHD (1996)-Adderall
Frontal Lobe Epileptic Events Documented (2000)
Back pain, leg pain and enuresis (day and night)
28. J.C. Continued (2001) Pneumonia, hospitalized; developed pneumonia (xopenex, singulair, claritin)
(2002) J.C. and siblings-Lyme disease; amoxicillin
(2003) Multiple syncopal and seizure episodes at school
29. Theories, Concepts, Research Related to Somatization One model does not fit all patients/families
Fully describing working model to families may be counterproductive initially
30. Biopsychosocialcultural Model Biological
Gender (female>male)
Genetic
Polymorphism genes
Promoter region Serotonin transporter (neuroticism, anxiety)
Catecholamine-O-Methyl transferase (pain sensitivity)
Tryptophan hydroxylase (somatic anxiety)
Temperament: Behavioral inhibition, harm avoidance
History of illness Genetic predisposition (Wender and Klein, 1981; Torgensen 1986; Guze 1993; Kender et al. 1995): concordant in twins, clusters in families with ADHD and Alcohol Dependence and Antisocial Personality Disorder
Genetic predisposition (Wender and Klein, 1981; Torgensen 1986; Guze 1993; Kender et al. 1995): concordant in twins, clusters in families with ADHD and Alcohol Dependence and Antisocial Personality Disorder
Genetic predisposition (Wender and Klein, 1981; Torgensen 1986; Guze 1993; Kender et al. 1995): concordant in twins, clusters in families with ADHD and Alcohol Dependence and Antisocial Personality Disorder
Genetic predisposition (Wender and Klein, 1981; Torgensen 1986; Guze 1993; Kender et al. 1995): concordant in twins, clusters in families with ADHD and Alcohol Dependence and Antisocial Personality Disorder
31. Biopsychosocialcultural Model Psychological
Previous Trauma
Sexual abuse
Physically threatening events
Personality
Poor coping—castastrophize, passive coping, dwell on or avoid symptoms
Alexithymia
Psychopathology
Anxious
Depressed
Substance use disorder
Alexithymia: normal process:Immature cognitive verbal skills and limited vocabulary for emotional expression in children may lead to somatization, the expression of distress through somatic symptoms.This normative phenomena becomes a problem if it is exaggerated and it leads to dysfunction and recurrent medical help-seeking. People who are called alexithymia continue to have not words for emotional distress and therefore may express it somatically.
33-50% with psych diagnosisAlexithymia: normal process:Immature cognitive verbal skills and limited vocabulary for emotional expression in children may lead to somatization, the expression of distress through somatic symptoms.This normative phenomena becomes a problem if it is exaggerated and it leads to dysfunction and recurrent medical help-seeking. People who are called alexithymia continue to have not words for emotional distress and therefore may express it somatically.
33-50% with psych diagnosis
32. Biopsychosocialcultural Model Social/Environmental
Parent behavior
Medical system
School
Role of Culture
Across all racial-ethnic groups and cultures
Lower SES and lower parent education
Expression of pain/distress influenced by culture
Stigma mental health (somatic c/o more socially acceptable and assistance given)
Parents can model and reinforce illness behavior. RAP study
Medical system-- The process of dx and tx gives families ideas about the condition. Families tend to interpret number of tests DONE as sign of seriousness, even if they are all normal.
School—May react to cause more stress, or may inadvertently reinforce the illness behavior and sick role.Parents can model and reinforce illness behavior. RAP study
Medical system-- The process of dx and tx gives families ideas about the condition. Families tend to interpret number of tests DONE as sign of seriousness, even if they are all normal.
School—May react to cause more stress, or may inadvertently reinforce the illness behavior and sick role.
33. Learning Theory Classical Conditioning
Pain associated with a behavior (eg walking) continues after the organic pathology is resolved.
Operant Conditioning
Illness behavior reinforced by attention from parents and avoidance of unpleasant tasks
Social Learning Theory
Parents model illness behavior for children Not one theory of somatization, but various learning theory concepts help explain the development and maintenance of somatoform behaviors.
Parental reinforcement of symptoms and discouragement of coping is likely to play a part in onset and maintenance of symptoms (in line with social learning theory)
Walker, et al. (1993): well children vs. physically ill children vs. somatizers---parents of somatizers more frequently responded to their children’s complaints with increased attention and special privileges
Osborne (19XX): somatizing children reported more positive consequences for their pain behavior than children with sickle cell anemia
Dunn-Geier: mothers of somatizers discouraged coping behavior with pain during an experimental task; related to greater symptom-related handicap in the child
Not one theory of somatization, but various learning theory concepts help explain the development and maintenance of somatoform behaviors.
Parental reinforcement of symptoms and discouragement of coping is likely to play a part in onset and maintenance of symptoms (in line with social learning theory)
Walker, et al. (1993): well children vs. physically ill children vs. somatizers---parents of somatizers more frequently responded to their children’s complaints with increased attention and special privileges
Osborne (19XX): somatizing children reported more positive consequences for their pain behavior than children with sickle cell anemia
Dunn-Geier: mothers of somatizers discouraged coping behavior with pain during an experimental task; related to greater symptom-related handicap in the child
34. Family Systems Theory Child’s symptoms serve a purpose in family
keep parents together
distract from other conflicts/stressors
draw in absent family member
Families of somatizers often have a very high level of agreement between patient and family regarding duration, location, severity and characteristics of pain and other complaints, which supports the notion of enmeshment; this dynamic is associated with more management problems and poor outcome
Families of somatizers often have a very high level of agreement between patient and family regarding duration, location, severity and characteristics of pain and other complaints, which supports the notion of enmeshment; this dynamic is associated with more management problems and poor outcome
Families of somatizers often have a very high level of agreement between patient and family regarding duration, location, severity and characteristics of pain and other complaints, which supports the notion of enmeshment; this dynamic is associated with more management problems and poor outcome
Families of somatizers often have a very high level of agreement between patient and family regarding duration, location, severity and characteristics of pain and other complaints, which supports the notion of enmeshment; this dynamic is associated with more management problems and poor outcome
35. Family Systems-Characteristics of Psychosomatic Families Enmeshment: excessive closeness, lack of privacy, blurring of interpersonal boundaries
Overprotection: worry excessively about each others’ health and safety
Rigidity: strong aversion to change and trouble with normal transition points
Lack of conflict resolution: much effort devoted to avoiding points of disagreement
Families of somatizers often have a very high level of agreement between patient and family regarding duration, location, severity and characteristics of pain and other complaints, which supports the notion of enmeshment; this dynamic is associated with more management problems and poor outcome
Families of somatizers often have a very high level of agreement between patient and family regarding duration, location, severity and characteristics of pain and other complaints, which supports the notion of enmeshment; this dynamic is associated with more management problems and poor outcome
Families of somatizers often have a very high level of agreement between patient and family regarding duration, location, severity and characteristics of pain and other complaints, which supports the notion of enmeshment; this dynamic is associated with more management problems and poor outcome
Families of somatizers often have a very high level of agreement between patient and family regarding duration, location, severity and characteristics of pain and other complaints, which supports the notion of enmeshment; this dynamic is associated with more management problems and poor outcome
36. Psychodynamic explanations
Resolution of unconscious intrapsychic conflict, wish or need
Choice of symptom determined by:
Physical manifestation of an unacceptable wish and the defense against it
The revival of a memory trace of a previous physical sensation
Identification with an important figure who suffered from a similar symptom
Punishment for an unacceptable wish or impulse directed against a loved one
37. Somatization and Sexual Abuse Study of adult patients with somatization disorder of five years or greater duration, showed an increase in self-reported childhood sexual abuse, as well as parental neglect or lack of attention, when compared to a control group
Adolescents with histories of sexual abuse scored higher on somatization scales than adolescents without histories of sexual abuse
Although practitioners should always be diligent in seeking out possible sexual abuse, unexplained somatic symptoms do not equal sexual abuse
38. Diagnosis/Assessment PCP sets the tone for the evaluation: avoid dichotomizing symptoms as organic versus non-organic
Discuss the symptoms from a multi-factorial, complex or biopsychosocial perspective (mind-body)
39. What is the role of the Mental Health Professional? Assessment is geared toward: identification of psychiatric symptoms, behavioral reinforces, psychosocial stressors, and level of disability/functionality
Treat co-morbid conditions
Work with team during assessment and treatment process including planning feedback that is optimal for family
40. Psychiatric Assessment Medical findings (absent or inconsistent; relationship to stressor)
Family beliefs regarding symptoms
Single undiagnosed primary medical cause
Belief in the role of environmental triggers
Beliefs regarding symptom management
History of childhood trauma
41. Psychiatric Assessment, Cont’d Family medical history
FH of unexplained somatic symptoms
Pattern of reinforcement of illness behavior
Impact of somatoform symptoms
Emotional
Family
Social and peer relationships
Academic
42. Psychiatric Assessment Reinforcement of somatoform symptoms
Reinforcement by parents
Increased attention from family/friends
Increased attention from medical providers
Avoidance of school, social or athletic stressor
43. Management of Somatoform Disorders PCP needs to remain actively involved in the case despite the lack of physiological support for the symptoms
Consolidate care and all referrals through the PCP?stop “doctor shopping” and search for alternative explanations
Discuss and reinforce strategies to return to function
Close communication between the PCP and the mental health professional (psychologist and psychiatrist)
44. Role of Mental Health Provider Identify Psychiatric Comorbidity
Communication with PCP and school
Self-management strategies
Self-monitoring
Training in coping and relaxation
Hypnosis
Biofeedback
45. Role of Mental Health Provider Improving Coping Skills
Active Coping: problem focused with emotional expression and regulation; problem solving
Accommodative Coping: accept and adjust to pain with distraction, self-encouragement, cognitive restructuring
Treat or refer for treatment of co-morbid psychiatric symptoms
46. Treatment Modalities Psycho-education
Psychotherapy
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Interpersonal Therapy
Family Therapy
Pharmacotherapy
Antidepressants (SSRIs)
BDD, Somatoform pain, IBS, Fibromyalgia, Functional Headaches
Open trial Citalopram pediatric FAP 84% (+)
47. Management of Somatoform Disorders (cont’d.) Interventions must allow for “saving face”
Focus on return to function, not etiology
Prescribed exercise and rehabilitation program based on sound behavioral principles (PT/OT and nursing staff must be on board)
48. Good Prognostic Indicators Early identification
Less expansive work-up
Short duration of symptoms
Monosymptomatic manifestation
Good pre-morbid personality functioning
85-97 % of cases end in full recovery (Leary, 2003)
49. Poor Prognostic Indicators Co-morbid conduct disorder
History of sexual abuse
Co-morbid anxiety or depressive disorder
Long duration of symptoms
Multi-system symptoms
Strong family history of somatization
50. Barriers to successful treatment Tertiary care treatment setting
Lack of communication between PCP in community
Disconnect between community providers, in-patient providers and mental health professionals trained and willing to work with this population
Lack of support for this type of care---multiple providers, not diagnosis- and treatment-driven; lack of financial reimbursement for the appropriate treatment modality
Multiple barriers for research into development of meaningful diagnostic entities and accumulation of evidence regarding outcome, treatment, etc.
51. Strategies to Improve Treatment Outcomes: Practice Tips Conceptualize and present problem in a way that is tolerable.
Find an ally in the family.
Do not focus on “cure” focus on increased function.
Improve insurance company’s support of treatment.
Continued communication between PCP and TCH.
52. Somatoform Action Plan:Future Directions Improved diagnostic anchors to assess childhood/adolescent Somatoform disorders.
Research to identify prevalence and associated co-morbidity of these disorders.
Improved reimbursement for specialized services to treat these illnesses.
Continued collaborative efforts between PCP and mental health providers while providing care.
53. References Levenson, J. Textbook of Psychosomatic Medicine (2005); 271-291; 768-769.
Lewis, M. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (2002); 847-858.
Martin, A., Volkmar, F.R. Lewis’ Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Textbook, 4th edition (2007).
Silber, T, Pao, M. Pediatrics in Review (2003);24:255-264.