slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
DON’T PANIC!

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 60

DON’T PANIC! - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 101 Views
  • Uploaded on

DON’T PANIC!. Understanding the 2011 Accountability Changes. Clicker Trivia. more than you wanted to know about accountability. State Accountability 2011 Overview. What content areas are evaluated?. Reading. Writing. Social Studies. Science. Math. All content areas are evaluated.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'DON’T PANIC!' - prem


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

DON’T PANIC!

Understanding the 2011 Accountability Changes

slide2

Clicker Trivia

more than you wanted to know

about accountability

slide4

What content areas are evaluated?

Reading

Writing

Social Studies

Science

Math

All content areas are evaluated.

slide5

What is measured?

% Met Standard

slide6

What grades are evaluated?

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Grades 3-11

slide7

What are the possible ratings

for a campus/district?

No New Ratings in 2012!

Exemplary

Recognized

Academically Acceptable

Academically Unacceptable

slide8

What are the 2011 standards?

Academically

Acceptable

Recognized

Exemplary

90

65

80

Math

90

70

80

Reading

90

60

80

Science

80

70

80

Social Studies

80

70

80

Writing

slide9

Alt

Acc

TAKS

M

2011 is the Last Year for TAKS!

What tests are evaluated?

slide10

What students are evaluated?

Every student in the accountability subset* on a campus is evaluated in the All Students group.

*Students enrolled on Snapshot Day (last Friday in October) and on Testing Day.

slide11

Students in the following groups may be evaluated again if the group is large enough

Economically Disadvantaged

African American

Hispanic

White

slide13

What other indicators are evaluated?

Completion Rate

Dropout Rate

Middle schools and Districts

High schools and Districts with 12th Grade

Standard = 75%

Standard = 1.6%

slide14

State Accountability

2011 Additional Updates

slide15

Commended Performance

STANDARDS

15% for Recognized, 25% for Exemplary

SUBJECTS

Reading/ELA and Mathematics

All Student Group and Economically Disadvantaged Students (if meets MSR)

STUDENTS

No (TPM, RI, and Exceptions will not be applied)

ANY HELP?

slide16

3

37.5

%

EXEMPLARY

8

All Student Group

slide17

ELL Progress Indicator

STANDARD

Meets 60%

Reading

SUBJECTS

All Students (MSR = 30) Students who tested in at least one of the specified assessments

STUDENTS

ANY HELP?

Required Improvement & Exceptions

slide18

LEP

LEP

LEP

LEP

M1

M1

M2

M2

M2

M1

slide19

TAKS

TELPAS

LEP

LEP

M1

M1

M2

M2

M2

M1

LEP

# Met Standard

# Met Criteria

slide20

M1

M1

M1

M2

M2

LEP

LEP

LEP

M1

M1

M2

M2

M2

M1

LEP

LEP

7

77.8%

9

slide21

What’s Happening with TPM?

  • For 2011 state accountability, the commissioner will consider several options in the use of TPM to ensure that student performance is acknowledged and that the state accountability system remains transparent.
  • Suspension of the use of TPM;
  • Continued use of TPM in state accountability, but only for districts that elect to use it; or
  • Include additional safeguards:
  • Applying performance floors,
  • Counting each student who fails, but it projected to pass as a fraction of a passer,
  • Prohibiting TPM to be used for the same measure in a subsequent year,
  • Limiting the number of measures for which TPM can be used in a given year, and
  • Limiting which rating categories can use TPM.
slide23

AEA Accountability Basics 2011

  • TAKS Progress Indicator
    • The TAKS Progress indicator standard will increase from 50% to 55%.
    • TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alternate results will be combined with TAKS and TAKS (Accommodated ) results to determine AEA ratings.
  • Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 7-12) and Completion Rate II Indicators
    • The Annual Dropout Rate indicator standard remains 20.0%.
    • The Completion Rate II indicator standard remains 60.0%.
  • English Language Learner (ELL) Progress Indicator
    • The ELL Progress Indicator standard will be 55%.
    • Required Improvement (RI) will be calculated.
    • The All Students group will be evaluated if the minimum size requirement is met.
slide24

Federal Accountability Overview

Adequate Yearly Progress

slide26

What is measured?

% Proficient

% Participate

slide28

What are the standards?

100

%

of students must pass in 2014

93

87

92

80

83

Reading

73

75

Math

67

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

% Proficient

slide29

What tests are evaluated?

TAKS

Acc

TAKS

M

TAKS

ALT

TAKS

LAT

TAKS

slide30

What students are evaluated?

Every student in the accountability subset* on a campus is evaluated in the All Students group.

*Students enrolled on Snapshot Day (last Friday in October) and on Testing Day.

slide31

Students in the following groups may be evaluated again if the group is large enough

Economically Disadvantaged

African American

Special Education

Hispanic

Limited English Proficient (LEP)

White

slide33

What other indicators are evaluated?

Graduation Rate

Attendance Rate

Elementary and Middle schools and Districts without 12th Grade

High schools and Districts with 12th Grade

Standard = 75%

Standard = 90%

slide34

Federal Accountability Overview

Additional Information

slide35

Graduation Rate

There are now 5 ways to meet the standard!

5

slide36

1

Meet the statewide 4-year Graduation Rate

goal of 90.0%

X

Class of 2009

slide37

2

Meet the 4-year Annual Graduation Rate Target of 75%

X

Class of 2009

slide38

60%

Graduation Rate:

Actual Improvement: 0.6%

Class of 2009

3

Meet the 4-year Safe Harbor Target (a 10.0% decrease in the difference between the prior year rate and 90.0%)

59.4%

Graduation Rate:

X

Improvement Required:

90 – 59.4 = 30.6, 30.6 x .1 = 3.1%

Class of 2008

slide39

60%

Graduation Rate:

Actual Improvement: 0.6%

Class of 2009

59.4%

Graduation Rate:

4

Meet the 4-year Improvement Target (a 1.0% increase from the prior year 4-year Graduation Rate)

X

Class of 2008

slide40

‘08

‘09

‘08

‘09

‘08

‘09

‘08

‘08

5

5 Year Graduation Rate = 80%

Graduation Rate = 50%

Class of 2008

Meet the 5-year longitudinal Annual Graduation Rate Target of 80% (for the class of 2008).

slide41

Student Groups Evaluated

For graduation rate, the LEP student group will include current LEP students plus students formerly identified as LEP during any of their high school years (Ever HS LEP)

LEP

!

In 2012, all student groups (that meet MSR) will be evaluated for AYP Graduation Rate

PREVIEW

slide42

Texas Projection Measure (TPM)

3

4

6

7

10

TPM will be used for TAKS-M in grades 3, 4, 6, 7, and 10

slide43

Federal Caps

How, exactly, do these work?!

M

Alt

a recent change in 2009
A Recent Change…in 2009

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

Alt

2% Cap Limit = 3

a recent change in 2010
A Recent Change…in 2010

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

Alt

X

M

2% Cap Limit = 3

federal cap process is unchanged
Federal Cap Process is Unchanged

Alt

M

1% TAKS Alt Cap – students are selected randomly from TAKS Alt proficient results

%

%

1

2

2% TAKS M Cap – Combination method is used to select TAKS M proficient results

The district’s AYP participation count for Reading/ELA and Math will continue to be used to calculate the caps.

slide47

Reading/ELA

1% TAKS Alt Cap Limit = 2,386 x .01 = 24

2% TAKS M Cap Limit = 2,386 x .02 = 48

Math

1% TAKS Alt Cap Limit = 2,379 x .01 = 24

2% TAKS M Cap Limit = 2,379 x .02 = 48

slide48

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

TAKS Alt

TAKS M

slide49

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

TAKS Alt

TAKS M

slide50

Step 2: Students are selected from the Did Not Meet Standard but are on track to meet the standard.

Step 1: Students are selected from the Met Standard group.

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

Alt

%

1

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

E

E

E

E

P

P

P

P

P

P

slide51

Campus Priority List

TEA Sort

Campus Priority List

District Sort

M

HS

%

2

1.

MS

2.

EL

3.

slide52

AYP Rules – Before Students Are Selected

The application of the accountability subset

Snapshot

Test Day

Minimum Size Requirement for each student group

MSR

Determine if student groups not meeting standard are eligible for Safe Harbor or TPM

slide53

Selecting Proficient Students – Reading/ELA

M

HS

#

2

1.

%

Meet AYP – Reading/ELA

MS

2.

#

Meet AYP – Reading/ELA

EL

#

3.

Meet AYP – Reading/ELA

slide54

Appeals to campus ranking or cap process will not be considered

HS

M

Districts may not Meet AYP after the cap process since priority is given to campuses meeting AYP

%

Appeal

2

MS

Campuses given a higher priority for the selection of students may require all available proficient student results

EL

No exceptions to the 2% Cap

slide56

Includes Worksheets To:

Identify student groups at risk of not meeting the 2011 standards.

Analyze commended rates for the All Student and Economically Disadvantaged groups (2006-2010)

Analyze ELL Progress Indicator results longitudinally at the campus- and student-level.

60

slide57

Campuses with Additional Campus Improvement Plan (CIP) Requirements

Formerly known as Technical Assistant Teams (TAT)

TAKS

Alt

Acc

M

70

65

RI & EP

60

Academically Acceptable

slide58

Region XIII Potential Pre-AU List

TAKS

Alt

Acc

M

70

65

RI & EP

60

Academically Acceptable

slide59

When we’ll know more…

  • February 17 Update on Accountability Development
  • April 19 Accountability Decisions for 2011
  • June 16 Accountability Manuals – State and AYP
  • August 18 Accountability Results for 2011
slide60

Erin Monge

erin.monge@esc13.txed.net | 512-919-5308

Arielle Arizpe

arielle.arizpe@esc13.txed.net | 512-919-5131