200 likes | 205 Views
Bulk properties at RHIC. Motivation Freeze-out properties at RHIC STAR perspective STAR PHENIX, PHOBOS Time-span estimates Summary and Open Questions. Olga Barannikova (Purdue University). Motivation. Bulk properties – “Soft Physics” Spectral shapes:
E N D
Bulk properties at RHIC • Motivation • Freeze-out properties at RHIC • STAR perspective • STAR PHENIX, PHOBOS • Time-span estimates • Summary and Open Questions Olga Barannikova (Purdue University)
Motivation Bulk properties – “Soft Physics” Spectral shapes: kinetic freeze-out properties transverse radial flow Tkin @ kinetic freeze-out X,W,f different behavior? Flavor composition: chemical freeze-out properties Tch@chemical freeze-out strangeness production strangeness enhancement? Resonance production: regeneration and rescattering K*, L(1520), f Partonic collectivity Thermalization Time span Berkeley School, May 2005
X+ Particle Identification dE/dx method K+ K_ Topological method K* K0s + p + p X L + p K(892) + K (1020) K + K (1520) p + K Berkeley School, May 2005
Transverse mass spectra K L K0s W • f K* X STAR Preliminary Variety of hadron species: K , K0s, K*, , , ,, (1520), S(1385), X(1530), , p, D++ pp, Au+Au, d+Au Same experimental setup! Berkeley School, May 2005
Statistical Model Fit 200 GeV Au+Au Stable particle ratios well described with Tch = 16010 MeV, mB = 24 5 MeV Thermalization ? Berkeley School, May 2005
Chemical Freeze-out Properties 200 GeV Au+Au Close to net-baryon free p,K,p Close to chemical equilibrium ! p,K,p,L,X Berkeley School, May 2005
where and Tdec = 100 MeV Spectral shapes Blast-wave model: E.Schnedermann et al, PRC48 (1993) 2462. , K, p T= 90MeV, b=0.6 X, T=160MeV, b=0.45 Common hydro description ? Kolb and Rapp, PRC 67 (2003) 044903. Sudden Single Freeze-out ? A. Baran et al.; nucl-th/0305075. Berkeley School, May 2005
, K, p T= 90MeV, b=0.6c T=160MeV , K, p b=0.5 c p- p- K- K- Fit details Berkeley School, May 2005
p- p,GeV/c p,GeV/c K- p,GeV/c Resonance effects? Thermal model: • One freeze-out Tchem = Tkin = T • Complete treatment of hadronic states • Boost-invariance at mid rapidity • T, B - fixed by ratios, , - fixed by p- spectra • W. Broniowski, et al, nucl-th/0305075 Berkeley School, May 2005
/dof 2 BW fit with Resonances /dof 6 • More complete study of resonance effects: code from • U.A.Wiedemann, U.Heinz, PRC 56 (1997), 3265 /dof 2 Berkeley School, May 2005
p- K- p- K- • PHENIX • STAR • PHOBOS p p Other RICH experiments? • STAR only • PHENIX+PHOBOS+STAR T= 96 MeV, b=0.57 c • Consistent BW results Berkeley School, May 2005
Kinetic Freeze-out Kinetic FO temperature • Sudden Single Freeze-out ?* Radial flow velocity • p,K,p: Tkindecreases with centrality • X: Tkin = const • , X and W flow Berkeley School, May 2005
Tc Partonic flow? Tkin ~ Tch ~ 160 MeV ~ 0.45 rescattering Tkin ~ 90 MeV, ~ 0.6 Freeze-out Evolution Lattice QCD: Tc = 17010 MeV • Chemical FO close to hadronization • Strong flow at hadronization Berkeley School, May 2005
Time Scale Tch Tkin For massless particles in equilibrium: Entropy density ~ T3 Berkeley School, May 2005
Hadrongas Chemical FO Kinetic FO Dense medium Hadronization Chemical FO Kinetic FO K* K K* measured lost K K* K* K measured K K Resonance Production and Survival • pp • No extended initial medium • Chemical freeze-out • Kinetic freeze-out close to the Chemical freeze-out pp • Au+Au • Extended hot and dense phase • Thermalization & Chemical freeze-out • Kinetic and Chemical freeze-outs are separated Tch Yields Tkin Spectra time • Resonances: • Two competing effects: regeneration and rescattering can change yields after chemical freeze-out • Ratio to stable particle reveals information time-span between Chemical and Kinetic FO time Au+Au Berkeley School, May 2005
<pT> in Au+Au at 200 GeV Signal loss at low pT: UrQMD: signal loss at low pT due to rescattering of decay daughters <pT> is higher UrQMD has long lifetime (Dt 5-20fm/c) ++ K* Signal loss of ~70% for K* <pT> increase from pp to Au+Au: K(892) <pT> (GeV/c) Proton <pT> (GeV/c) Centrality 0% - 10% 1.080 0.120 1.090 0.110 50% - 80% 1.030 0.120 0.760 0.050 pp 0.680 0.040 0.620 0.040 Berkeley School, May 2005
Resonances and Stat. Model Resonance Suppression Strangeness Enhancement 200 GeV pp 200 GeV Au+Au • In pp particle ratios are well described • In Au+Au only stable particle ratios are well described Berkeley School, May 2005
Ratios M. Bleicher et al. J. Phys. G 25 (1999) 1859 Thermal model σ(Kπ) σ(ππ) • UrQMD • Marcus Bleicher and Jörg Aichelin • Phys. Lett. B530 (2002) 81. M. Bleicher and Horst Stöcker .Phys.G30 (2004) 111. Life time [fm/c] : = 40 L = 13 K* = 4 ++ = 1.7 K* + K K + K p + K ++ p+ p Resonance ratios modified from pp to Au+Au Rescattering and regeneration is needed ! > 4 fm/c (lower limit) Berkeley School, May 2005 Rescattering and regeneration is needed !
Summary • Chemical Freeze-out conditions: • Particle ratios suggest equilibrium • Invariant Tch ~160 MeV ~ TC -near lattice phase boundary • Thermal model does not reproduce resonances • Kinetic freeze-out conditions: • p,K,p vary with centrality : Tkin,b • Collectivity (strong flow) builds up very early • Multistrange baryons:Tkin ~ Tch • Between freeze-outs: • Chemical kinetic: Dt ~6fm/c • Resonances are strongly affected by rescattering • Dt >4 fm/c rescattering-based estimate – in agreement with blast wave results Berkeley School, May 2005
Soft Hard Intermediate • T = 90 MeV • T = 160 MeV • T = 90 MeV • T = 160 MeV STAR Preliminary 0 2-3 GeV/c 6-7 GeV/c pT p- T = 87 MeV Hydro,Statistical Model pQCD, Fragmentation Jet quenching T = 101 MeV p- K- ?? T = 109 MeV • PHENIX • STAR • PHOBOS p p p Open Questions and a Wish List Applicability limits? Theoretical models for extended momentum range Berkeley School, May 2005