1 / 14

The Experience Machine Revisited

The Experience Machine Revisited. Dan Turton July 2008. Plan. The Experience Machine How it (supposedly) refutes hedonism Being precise about the argument Counter-thought experiment A better explanation of our reaction to the idea of getting in to the Experience Machine.

posy
Download Presentation

The Experience Machine Revisited

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Experience Machine Revisited Dan Turton July 2008

  2. Plan • The Experience Machine • How it (supposedly) refutes hedonism • Being precise about the argument • Counter-thought experiment • A better explanation of our reaction to the idea of getting in to the Experience Machine

  3. The Experience Machine • Nozick (1974) • Aimed to show that more matters to us than how our experiences feel from the inside • Reality matters

  4. Hedonism • Hedonism: only pleasure is good, only pain is bad • pleasure and not pain = happiness (or positive well-being) • Pleasure: mental state • Internalism about pleasure (traditional) • E.g. Bentham, Crisp • Externalism about pleasure • E.g. Mill, Feldman

  5. The Experience Machine vs. Hedonism P1) Because we prefer our current life to a life in the Experience Machine, pleasurable experiences based on reality contribute more positively to well-being than those which are not P2) Traditional hedonism states that only how pleasurable and painful our experiences feel to us on the inside affects our well-being c) Therefore, traditional hedonism is false

  6. The Target (for Refutation) • The Experience Machine thought experiment gives us good reason to think that pleasures based on reality contribute more positively to our well-being than those which are not • We chose not to get into the Experience Machine because real experiences matter more to us than fake ones

  7. The Trip to Reality • Turton (2008) • Aims to show that how real our experiences are does not really matter to us • By producing a different intuition about getting into an experience machine • Intuitions are easily biased

  8. Intuitions as Evidence • Woodward and Allman (2007) • One-dimensional visceral sensation (Gut feeling) • Result of probabilistic pattern recognition between current stimuli and past experiences • Susceptible to biases • Can’t introspect • Reconstruction is tough

  9. Status Quo Bias • Irrational preference for an option that preserves the status quo • Endowment bias, familiarity bias, implicit egotism, risk aversion, loss aversion • The Mug Experiment • In both thought experiments we go for the status quo (not what is real)

  10. Machine Failure • Nozick stipulates against machine failure • Our intuitive cognition doesn’t listen • In the Trip to Reality, it is much easier for our intuitive cognition to imagine that the machine works perfectly

  11. Imaginative Resistance • Nozick doesn’t go out of his way to make the machine sound great • What did you imagine being in the Experience Machine to be like? • In the Trip to Reality, it is much easier to imagine how much better being in the machine is • But we still can’t imagine improving our most pleasurable experience

  12. Moral Responsibility • Nozick stipulates against this being a factor • Our intuitive cognition doesn’t listen • In the Trip to Reality, most of our moral obligations are eliminated • A hedonist could rationally choose not to get into a machine for this reason anyway

  13. The Experience Machine vs. Hedonism (Revisited) • If the ‘realness’ of our experiences doesn’t stop up from getting in the machine in the Trip to reality thought experiment, then how can it in Nozick’s Experience Machine thought experiment? • Alternate reasons (irrelevant and irrational biases) were given that explain choices in both scenarios • The original intuition is undermined

  14. Conclusion • Hedonists who reluctantly changed or gave up their well-being related inclinations because of the Experience Machine can now safely return • Staunch opponents will ask for a new test, in which reality is more precisely isolated • E.g. Deceived businessman (also dealt with in my thesis)

More Related