- By
**posy** - Follow User

- 111 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Point-to-Point vs Wavelength Routed' - posy

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Point-to-Point WDM

Electrical Packet Switching

Packet processing overhead

Efficient bandwidth utilization

Poor scalability, Good flexibility

High energy consumption

Wavelength Routed

Circuit switching (end-to-end)

No packet processing

Inefficient bandwidth utilization

Good scalability, Mediocre flexibility

Low energy consumption

Optical packet switching (future)

Point-to-Point vs Wavelength RoutedOXC Architecture

Optical Cross Connect (OXC)

Μετατροπέας μηκών κύματος (wavelength converter): λειτουργικότητα και χαρακτηριστικά

- Ένας ιδανικός μετατροπέας μηκών κύματος έχει τα ακόλουθα χαρακτηριστικά:
- - διαφάνεια στους ρυθμούς bit και στις διαμορφώσεις σημάτων
- ταχύς χρόνος προετοιμασίας του μήκους κύματος εξόδου
- μετατροπή τόσο στα κοντύτερα όσο και στα μακρύτερα μήκη κύματος
- δυνατότητα για ίδια μήκη κύματος εισόδου και εξόδου (όχι μετατροπή)
- αναισθησία στην πόλωση των σημάτων εισόδου
- low-chirp σήμα εξόδου με υψηλό λόγο ‘απόσβεσης’ και πολύ μεγάλο λόγο
- σήματος-προς-θόρυβο
- απλή υλοποίηση

- αραιή κομβική μετατροπή: δίνει μόνο σε ένα περιορισμένο αριθμό κόμβων
- πλήρεις δυνατότητες μετατροπής
- αραιή μετατροπή εξόδων μεταγωγέων: χρησιμοποιεί μεταγωγείς που
- μοιράζονται ένα περιορισμένο πλήθος μετατροπέων μηκών κύματος
- αραιή (ή περιορισμένη) μετατροπή εύρους: δίνει μόνο ένα περιορισμένο
- εύρος στους μεταγωγείς που αναπτύσσονται, εξαιτίας περιορισμένου κόστους
- και ισχύος

Αραιή μετατροπή εύρους

εύρος μετατροπής = 1

Αδιαφανές οπτικό δίκτυο

εγκαθιστά end-to-end μονοπάτια φωτός κατά μήκος του δικτύου

αναπαράγει τα σήματα σε κάθε hop στο δίκτυο

Ημιδιαφανές οπτικό δίκτυο

- αναπαράγει τα σήματα μόνο όταν είναι απαραίτητο
- ιδέα των σταθμών ανεφοδιασμού
- αναπαραγωγή στον κόμβο στα μισά του δρομολογίου

Routing and Wavelength Assignment problem (RWA)

(without wavelength conversion at the nodes)

Μοντελοποίηση του μήκους των μονοπατιών

λογισμικό ελέγχου

- ανάθεση κόστους σε κάθε μετατροπέα μηκών κύματος
- κόστος ενός μονοπατιού για μια σύνδεση = κόστος συνδέσμων +
- κόστος μετατροπής μηκών κύματος
- το μονοπάτι μικρότερου κόστους περιλαμβάνει κόστη συνδέσμων
- και κόστη μετατροπών μηκών κύματος

Μονοπάτια φωτός και δρομολόγηση μηκών κύματος

- μονοπάτι φωτός
- εικονική τοπολογία
- περιορισμός συνέχειας μηκών
- κύματος
- μετατροπή μηκών κύματος
- δρομολόγηση
- φραγμένο μήκος μονοπατιών
- φωτός

Εικονική τοπολογία

The 1+1 protection. No protocol is needed

Working fibre

Protection fibre

The 1:1 and 1:N protection. Signaling protocol is needed

1+1 is faster than 1:1 but in the latter case the spare

fibre could be used for low priority traffic (extra Tx, Rx)

Path protection

Note that rerouting is handled by source-destination nodes.

Link protection:

In (a) the traffic is re-routed to a different fibre

in (b) each channel may take a different route.

b

a

Wavelength Routing Pros and Cons

- Setting up a lightpath is like setting up a circuit (a 2-way process with Req and Ack): RTT = tens of ms
- Pros:
- good for smooth traffic
- Mature OXC technology (msec switching time)
- QoS guarantee due to fixed BW reservation
- Cons: BW inefficient for bursty (data) traffic
- wasted BW during off/low-traffic periods
- very coarse granularity (OC-48 and above)
- limited # of wavelengths (thus # of lightpaths)

Wavelength-Routed WDM networks

- Physical topology: A set of routing nodes connected by fiber links
- Optical Cross-connect - OXC: No O-E-O conversion
- Lightpath: A lightpath has to be setup before the data transmission. A Lightpath remains in the optical domain from src to dst
- Logical topology: The set of src-dst pairs connected through lightpaths

OXC

OXC

Wavelength reuse

# wavelengths << # OXCs

OXC

OXC

OXC

OXC

OXC

Routing and Wavelength Assignment

RWA: Routing and Wavelength Assignment

- Definition
- Given: network topology, end-to-end connection requests
- Problem: Determine routes and wavelengths for the requests
- Offline RWA (network planning phase)
- The entire set of requests are given in advance (traffic matrix).
- Online RWA (network operation phase)
- Requests arrive randomly over time and are served one-by-one
- Objective: Minimizing the Overall Blocking Probability

Transparent wavelength routed networks

- All-optical transparent networks: advantages in capacity, cost and energy
- The transmission quality is affected by physical layer impairments (PLIs)
- Physical layer blocking: the signal detection at the receiver may be infeasible
- Impairment aware (IA)-RWA algorithms

Pure RWA - problem definition

- Input:
- Network topology: connected graph G=(V,E)
- V: set of nodes, assumed not to be equipped with wavelength converters
- E: set of point-to-point single-fiber links
- Each fiber is able to support a set C={1,2,…,W} of W distinct wavelengths
- A-priori known traffic scenario given in a matrix of nonnegative integers Λ
- Output:
- the RWA instance solution, in the form of routes and assigned wavelengths
- the number of wavelengths required to route all the connections
- Objective: minimize the number of used wavelengths

IntegerLinear Programming(ILP)

- Integer variablesx

minimize cT.x

subject to A.x ≤ b, x = (x1,...,xn) ∈ Ζn

- The general ILP problem is NP-complete
- Algorithms
- Solve small-medium size ILP problems
- Branch-and-bound
- Cutting plane
- Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP): integer and float variables

ONDM 2011, Bologna, Italy

Convex Hall

- The same set of integer solutions can be described by different sets of constraints (the same set of integer solutions can be included in different-shaped n-dimensional polyhedrons)
- The convex hull is the minimum convex set that includes all the integer solutions of the problem
- Given the convex hull we can use a LP algorithm to obtain the optimal ILP solution in polynomial time
- The transformation of a general n-dimension polyhedron to the corresponding convex hull is difficult (process used in cutting plane techniques)
- Good ILP formulation: the feasible region defined by the linear constraints is close (tight) to the corresponding convex hull
- A large number of vertices consist of integer variables. This increases the probability of obtaining an integer solution when solving the corresponding LP-relaxation of the initial ILP problem

ONDM 2011, Bologna, Italy

LP Formulation and Flow Cost Function

Flow Cost Function

- Increasing and Convex (to imply a greater amount of ‘undesirability’ when a link becomes congested)
- Approximated by a piecewise linear function
- Integer break points (makes Simplex yield integer optimal solutions with high probability)

We obtain integer solutions in 98% of the

problem instances!

Random perturbation

- In the general multicommodity problem, a flow that is served by more than one paths has equal sum of first derivates over the links of those paths
- In our problem a request that is served by more than one lightpaths has equal sums of first derivates over the links of these paths
- To avoid such cases, we multiply the slopes of each variable on each link with a random number that is close to 1
- In this way, the cases that two variables have equal derivates over the links that comprise a path are reduced, and thus we obtain more integer solutions

Handling non-integer solutions

- Make Simplex yield integer optimal solutions
- Piecewise linear cost functions
- Random perturbation technique
- Still the solution may be non-integer
- Iterative fixings
- Fix the integer variables of the solutions and solve the remaining (reduced) LP problem
- The objective cost does not change if we get to an integer solution it is optimal
- When fixing does not further increase the integrality, we proceed to the rounding process
- Iterative rounding
- Round a single variable, the one closest to 1, and continue solving the reduced LP problem
- Rounding helps us move to a higher objective and search for an integer solution there
- If the objective changes we are not sure anymore that we will find an optimal solution

Pure RWA algorithm

Use a pure RWA algorithm that is based

on a LP-relaxation formulation

The algorithm consists of 4 steps

1. We calculate a set of candidate paths

2. Using the set of candidate paths we formulate the RWA instance as a LP problem and use Simplex to solve it

3. We handle a fractional (non-integer) solution, by applying iterative fixing and rounding methods

4. We handle non infeasible instances (when the RWA instance cannot be served with the given number of wavelengths)

IA-RWA problem

- IA-RWA objective: minimize the number of wavelengths used (network layer) and also select lightpaths with acceptable transmission quality (physical layer)
- For IA-RWA algorithms we classify physical layer impairments (PLIs) into:
- 1st class PLIs: generated by the same lightpath (ASE, CD, PMD, FC, SPM)
- 2nd class PLIs: generated due to inter-lightpath interference (XT, XPM, FWM)
- PLIs of the 2nd class make routing decisions for one lightpath affect and be affected by decisions made for the other lightpaths
- Solution:
- Worst case interference assumption
- Actual interference: cross layer optimization

Worst Case and Actual Interference

Actual interference: cross layer optimization algo:

- Consider PLIs that do not depend on interference (1st class PLIs)
- Prune candidate lightpaths that do not have acceptable QoT
- Formulate the interference among lightpaths into the RWA

Worst case interference algo:

- Consider PLIs that do not depend on interference (1st class PLIs)
- Assume all wavelengths active (2nd class PLIs)
- Prune candidate lightpaths that do not have acceptable QoT

Illustrative example: DTnet topology - single connection request between all (s,d) pairs

The reduction in the solution space can deteriorate wavelength performance

Physical layer evaluation: Q-factor

- Use the Q factor to estimate the feasibility of a lightpath
- The Q factor is related to the BER
- Analytical formulas can be used to calculate the Q factor

Proposed IA-RWA algorithms

- Indirect IA-RWA algo: Constrain the impairment generating sources
- the length and the number of hops of a path
- the number of adjacent (and second adjacent) channels over all links of the lightpath
- the number of intra-channel generating sources (lightpaths crossing the same switch utilizing the same wavelength) along the lightpath
- Direct IA-RWA algo: Use the definition of Q factor and noise variance related parameters to define physical layer constraints into the RWA

Indirect (Parametric) IA-RWA algo

Number of active adjacent channels

(Affected PLIs: Intra-XT, XPM and FWM)

Number of intra-channel XT sources

(Soft) constrain the number of adjacent channel interfering sources on lightpath (p,w)

B is a large constant used to activate/deactivate the constraint

Similarly we constrain the second-adjacent channel interfering sources

(Soft) constrain the number of intra-XT interfering sources on lightpath (p,w)

B is a large constant used to activate/deactivate the constraint

Similarly we constrain the second-adjacent channel interfering sources

Carry the surplus variables in the minimization objective

Direct (Sigma Bound) IA-RWA algo

- For each candidate lightpath (p,w) inserted in the RWA formulation, we calculate an upper bound on the interference noise variance it can tolerate, after accounting for the impairments that do not depend on the utilization of the other lightpaths (account for 1st Class PLIs).
- Then using noise-variance related parameters per link we can constrain the interference (due to 2nd Class PLIs) accumulated on lightpath (p,w)
- If the selected lightpaths satisfy these constraints they have, by definition, acceptable quality of transmission

Performance evaluation results

- Simulation platform

Matlab + LINDO API

- Generic DT network topology
- Traffic Scenarios
- Random traffic matrix generator
- DTnet actual traffic matrix
- Physical Layer Evaluation: Q-Tool
- Uses analytical models to calculate the Q factor of lightpaths
- Realistic physical layer parameters

Pure RWA performance

- 100 RWA instances
- ILP min-max: optimality criterion
- LP min-max: running time & integrality criteria
- The proposed LP-relaxation+piecewise linear costs has superior performance
- The performance is Improved with the random perturbation technique

Indirect and Direct IA-RWA

- 100 RWA instances
- W=16 available wavelengths
- Algorithms:
- Pure RWA
- Indirect P-IA-RWA
- Direct SB-IA-RWA
- The proposed IA-RWA algorithms reduce the (physical layer) blocking
- Additional wavelengths are required to spread the lightpaths and avoid interference
- The direct SB-IA-RWA algo can find zero blocking solutions
- The direct SB-IA-RWA algo maintains zero blocking up to ρ=0.8, after which the 16 available wavelengths are not enough

Direct IA-RWA algo performance

- Direct SB-IA-RWA algorithm, solved using
- The proposed LP-relaxation technique
- ILP
- 100 random RWA instances
- Find zero blocking solutions
- Using ILP we were able to solve all instances within 5 hours up to ρ=0.7 load
- Using the LP-relaxation the optimality is lost in 2 or 3 instances but the execution time is maintained very low

Realistic traffic matrix

- Realistic traffic matrix (381 connections load ρ=2.05)
- The propose IA-RWA algorithms reduce the physical layer blocking
- The direct SB-IA-RWA finds zero blocking solution
- with W=36
- Running time: 20 minutes

acceptable for the realistic network and traffic load

Dynamic ΙΑ-RWA Algorithm

- Input:

New connection request

Current network state

- Objective: serve the connections and minimize blocking over (infinite) time
- We use a multicost algorithm with 2 phases
- Calculate the set of non-dominated paths from the given source to the given destination
- Choose the lightpath that minimizes the objective function

Calculating the Set of Non-Dominated Paths

- Cost vector of link l:

Vector maps the utilization of wavelengths

- The cost vector of path pcan be calculated based on the cost vectors of links l=1,2,...,m, that comprise it
- The cost parameters of a path can be combined so as to calculate the Q factors of the available lightpaths over that path
- Prune the solution space
- For each p, we check the Q factor of available lightpaths and we make unavailable those that do not have acceptable performance
- Σταματάμε να επεκτείνουμε μονοπάτια αν δεν έχουν τουλάχιστον ένα διαθέσιμο μήκος κύματος

Q

Q

Qmax

Q

dmin

dmin

Calculating the Set of Non-Dominated PathsDomination relationship between two paths

p1 dominates p2 (p1 > p2) iff

- Using the above definitions we use a multicost algorithm, which is a generalization of Dijkstra algorithm, to compute the set of non-dominated paths Pn-d from the given source to the given destination
- By definition, the paths that are included in Pn-dhave
- At least one available wavelength
- The available wavelength have acceptable transmission performance (Q factor)

Optimization Policies

We evaluated 3 optimization policies (that correspond to 3 different IA-RWA algorithms)

i) Most Used Wavelength (MUW)

We order the lightpaths to decreasing wavelength utilization order and select the one that is used more in the network.

ii) Better Q performance (bQ)

We select the lightpath with the higher Qfactor value

iii) Mixed better Q and most used wavelength (bQ-MUW)

From the set of available lightpaths we select those with Q values no less than 0.5dB than the highest Q value and then apply the MUW policy to this new set of lightpaths

Mixed Line Rates WDM Networks

- Several Line Rates (10/40/100)Gbps
- Exploit the MLR heterogeneity to reduce the cost of the network
- Long-distance low-bit-rate connections could be served with inexpensive low-rate and long-reach (e.g. 10 Gbps) transponders
- High bit-rate connections could be served with more expensive higher-rate transponders. Typically, higher rate transponders have shorter reach
- Interference among lightpaths of different rates
- Mixed Line Rates RWA algorithms

Transmission Reach & Effective Length

- Rates: r={10,40,100}Gbps
- Fiber types: t={{10}, {40}, {100}, {10,40}, {10,100}, {40,100}, {10,40,100}}
- Interference between different modulation format/rates
- mr,t≥1: the increase of the length of the link for a connection of rate r, due to interference effects generated by the other modulation formats/rates concurrently transmitted over the fiber t
- mr,t≡{r}=1: a fiber (t≡{r}) is used only by connections of a certain rate r(its effective length is equal to its real length)

- Length of link l:
- Maximum transmission reach at r :
- Effective length of fiber t for a transmission of rate r
- Effective length of the path p at rate r
- Satisfy:

Transmission Reach & Effective Length

- AC and CB are t={10}
- AB is t={10,40}
- Effective length of the path pACB at rate 10
- Effective length of the path pABD at rate 10
- m10,{10}=1
- m10,{10,40} ≥ 1

- Length of link l:
- Maximum transmission reach at r :
- Effective length of fiber t for a transmission of rate r
- Effective length of the path p at rate r
- Satisfy:

MLR RWA - Problem Definition

- Input:
- Network topology: graph G=(V,E)

V: set of nodes (no wavelength conversion), E: set of point-to-point single-fibers

- Each fiber supports

C={1,2,…,W}: W distinct wavelengths, R={r1,r2,…,rM}: M different bit rates

- A-priori known traffic scenario given in a matrix Λ of requested bandwidth
- Output: The RWA instance solution, in the form of routes, assigned wavelengths and bit rates
- Objective: minimize the network cost related to the number and the type of the transponders used
- Constraints: single wavelength assignment, wavelength continuity, transmission reach (based on effective length)

ILP Formulation

Enable/disable the use of a certain path for a certain rate based on the effective lengths of the links that it comprise it

utilization of different rates of a link

type of fiber used on link

Prohibit the utilization of lightpaths over paths that cannot be used for a transmission at a certain rate

ONDM, Bologna, 2011

Performance Evaluation Results

- Simulation platform: Matlab + CPLEX
- Generic DT network topology
- 14 nodes
- 46 directed links
- Traffic Scenarios
- DTnet actual traffic matrix
- range from 4.5 up to 47 Gbps
- average 15 Gbps
- Scale up to 8 times
- Fiber types
- T={{10},{40},{10,40}}
- Costs and maximum reach
- C10=1, D10=2500 km, C40=2.5, D40=800 km

Performance Evaluation Results

Heuristics

For comparison purposes

Lower bound of network cost: No interference between different rates

For comparison purposes

Network planning under worst case interference assumption

Da40=800/1.25=640 km

Multiplier factor

Number of fiber types used per load

Even at high loads the ILP algorithm

manages to have a high number of links

that support only 40 Gbps connections

Semi-static optical circuit

50 Gb/s

20 Gb/s

Dynamicoptical circuit

100 Gb/s

Requirements for Flexible Optical Networking- Continuous growth of consumers IP traffic
- Emerging high-rate applications (video on demand, HDTV, cloud and grid applications)

- WDM: advanced modulation formats and electronic digital equalization 40 and 100 Gbps channel bandwidths
- WDM has rigid and coarse granularity. A problem that becomes even more severe at higher channel rates
- Requirements: cost and energy scalable, flexible, and with fine granularity network

C

B

D

A

E

Spectrum flexible optical network

- Gains:
- Spectrum savings, higher spectral efficiency
- Dynamic spectrum sharing : statistical multiplexing gains similar to those observed in time sharing systems (e.g. OBS, OPS nets)
- Traditional RWA algos are not directly applicable in OFDM networks

Spectrum variable (non-constant)

connections

Spectrum flexible OXCs

Spectrum flexible transponders

Optical OFDM Transmission

Bandwidth-variable OFDM transponders

2 degrees of flexibility

- Frequency domain: elastic allocation of spectrum, in terms of subcarriers
- Modulation format: control the modulation format of the subcarriers through DSP: single bit per symbol binary phase-shift keying (BPSK), QPSK (2 bits per symbol), 8QAM (3 bits per symbol), etc.

M. Jinno, et. al., “Distance-adaptive spectrum resource allocation in spectrum-sliced elastic optical path network” IEEE Commun. Mag., 2010.

Planning Problem: RMLSA

- Network topology: connected graph G=(V,E)
- The spectral granularity of the transmitters and BV WXCs is 1 subcarrier, corresponding to F GHz of spectrum
- C is the base capacity of a subcarrier using single bit per symbol BPSK
- R is the modulation level multiplier, R=1,2,3,.., for BPSK, QPSK, 8QAM,etc
- Function g relates the length of a path with the higher modulation level that can be used over that path with acceptable QoT
- Guardband of G subcarriers separates adjacent spectrum paths
- Traffic matrix Λ, Λsd capacity required for the communication between s,d
- We want to find for each connection, the Route, the Modulation Level and the Spectrum Allocation, to minimize the total spectrum used in the network

RMLSA ILP

- Pre-processing phase
- For each commodity s-d we pre-calculate k paths, let Psd be the set of candidate paths for s-d
- Map each path p to a capacity multiplier Rp {1,2,3,..} (assuming base subcarrier capacity C) using function g that relates the length of a path with the highest modulation level
- ILP Variables
- xp: Boolean variable that denotes the utilization of path p δP
- fsd: Integer variable that denotes the starting frequency for connection (s,d). Denoting Ftotal= , we have 0 ≤ fsd< Ftotal
- δsd,s’d’: Boolean variable that equals 0 if fs’d’<fsd), and 1 otherwise
- c: maximum utilized spectrum slot

Fully flexible OFDM vs. WDM & MLR

- Spectrally and modulation level flexible O-OFDM
- 5 GHz per subcarrier, 2.5 Gbps (BPSK)
- Guardband G=2 subcarriers
- Adaptive modulation level: BPSK, QPSK, 8QAM, etc, transmit up to 3000km, 1500 km, 750 km, etc
- WDM with 40 Gbps wavelength
- Mixed line rates (MLR) WDM

10, 40 100 Gpbs wavelengths transmit up to 3000, 1500, and 500 km

K. Christodoulopoulos, I. Tomkos, E. Varvarigos, “Spectrally/Bitrate Flexible Optical Network Planning”, ECOC 2010

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..