1 / 21

Comparative Analysis of Ultra-Low Voltage Flip-Flops for Energy Efficiency

Comparative Analysis of Ultra-Low Voltage Flip-Flops for Energy Efficiency. Bo Fu and Paul Ampadu IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems,pp.1173-1176, 27-30 May 2007 指導老師 : 魏凱城 老師 學 生 : 蕭荃泰

Download Presentation

Comparative Analysis of Ultra-Low Voltage Flip-Flops for Energy Efficiency

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comparative Analysis of Ultra-Low Voltage Flip-Flops for Energy Efficiency Bo Fu and Paul Ampadu IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems,pp.1173-1176, 27-30 May 2007 指導老師: 魏凱城 老師 學 生: 蕭荃泰 日 期: 97年3月3日 彰化師範大學積體電路設計研究所

  2. Outline • Abstract • Flip Flop Design Metrics • Experimental Setup • Simulation Results • Conclusions

  3. Abstract • In this paper, the impact of voltage scaling on the performance of flip-flops is analyzed. • Four representative flip-flops are compared at ultra-low voltages, for delay, energy and energy-delay-product (EDP). • Voltage scaling has become one of the most effective techniques to reduce system energy consumption.

  4. Flip Flop Design Metrics • PowerPC Master-slaver latch 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0

  5. Modified Clock CMOS (mC2MOS) Master-slave latch 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1

  6. Hybrid-latch Flip Flop (HLFF) 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1

  7. Sense-Amplifier-based Flip Flop (SAFF) 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 Q改變 Q不變 設=1 0 0 1

  8. Timing parameters Definition of Tsetup

  9. Experimental Setup The simulation test bench.

  10. Simulation Results • Experiments were performed using the 90 nm Predictive Technology Model (PTM) [11] at room temperature (27oC). • The flip-flops are optimized for minimum energy at a nominal supply voltage 1.2 V using the sizing schemes mentioned in [4].

  11. a. Effects of Voltage Scaling onTiming Parameters (a) Function failure voltages (b) Function failure in HLFF Supply voltages of various flip-flop designs failing to latch the proper data

  12. Low-to-high High-to-low Low-to-high High-to-low (a) TC->Q (b) Tsetup Timing parameters of the flip-flop as a function of the supply voltage.

  13. (c) Worst case delay of TD->Q Timing parameters of the flip-flop as a function of the supply voltage.

  14. (a) Supply voltage 1.2 V (b) Supply voltage 0.3 V High-to-low transition of HLFF with a varied TD->C time.

  15. b. Effect of Voltage Scaling on Energy Consumption • The energy dissipation of selected flip-flop designs from 0.3 V to 1.2 V with a clock frequency of 50 MHz. • The result shows that PowerPC consumes the least energy compared to other flip-flops examined.

  16. (b) Activity 0.5 (a) Activity 1 Energy dissipation as a function of the supply voltage for different switching activities.

  17. (c) Activity 0 (all 1) (d) Activity 0 (all 0) Energy dissipation as a function of the supply voltage for different switching activities.

  18. c. Effect of Voltage Scaling on Energy-Delay Product (a) Activity 1 (b) Activity 0 (all 1) EDP as a function of supply voltage and switching activities.

  19. (c) Voltage 1.2 V (d) Voltage 0.3 V EDP as a function of supply voltage and switching activities.

  20. Conclusions • The performance of various flip-flops at ultra-low voltages was analyzed in this paper. • The impact of supply voltage scaling on timing parameters of a flip-flop depends on the type of flip-flop and input transition. • For energy efficient operation at ultra-low voltages, HLFF achieves the smallest EDP when switching activity is high and a transistor based flip-flop achieves the smallest EDP at low switching activities.

  21. THE END

More Related