optimizing compilers cisc 673 spring 2009 dynamic compilation i n.
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Optimizing Compilers CISC 673 Spring 2009 Dynamic Compilation I

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 15

Optimizing Compilers CISC 673 Spring 2009 Dynamic Compilation I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 69 Views
  • Uploaded on

Optimizing Compilers CISC 673 Spring 2009 Dynamic Compilation I. John Cavazos University of Delaware. Quiz Time. What’s a managed language ?. Quiz Time. What’s a managed language ? Java or C# Runs under management of a VM Object Oriented, Garbage collected Dynamic compilation.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Optimizing Compilers CISC 673 Spring 2009 Dynamic Compilation I' - portia-benson


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
quiz time
Quiz Time

What’s a managed language?

quiz time1
Quiz Time

What’s a managed language? Java or C#

  • Runs under management of a VM
  • Object Oriented, Garbage collected
  • Dynamic compilation
quiz time2
Quiz Time

True or False?

  • Because they execute at runtime, dynamiccompilers must be blazingly fast?
  • Dynamic class loading is a fundamental roadblock to cross-method optimization?
  • A static compiler will always produce better code than a dynamic compiler?
  • Sophisticated profiling is too expensive to perform online?
what is a vm1
What is a VM?

A software execution engine that provides a machine-independent language implementation

what s in a vm for a managed language1
What’s in a VM for a Managed Language?
  • Program loader
  • Program “checkers”, e.g., bytecode verifiers, security services
  • Dynamic compilation system
  • Memory management
  • Thread scheduler
  • Profiling & monitoring
  • Libraries
basic vm structure
Basic VM Structure

Program/Bytecode

Executing Program

Class Loader, Verifier, etc.

Heap

Thread Scheduler

Dynamic Compilation Subsystem

Garbage Collector

adaptive optimization hall of fame
Adaptive Optimization Hall of Fame
  • 1958-1962: LISP
  • 1974: Adaptive Fortran
  • 1980-1984: ParcPlace Smalltalk
  • 1986-1994: Self
  • 1995-present: Java
quick history of vms
Quick History of VMs
  • Adaptive Fortran [Hansen’74]
    • First in-depth exploration of adaptive optimization
    • Selective optimization, models, multiple optimization levels, online profiling and control systems
  • LISP Interpreters [McCarthy’78]
    • First widely used VM
    • Pioneered VM services
      • memory management,
      • Eval -> dynamic loading
quick history of vms1
Quick History of VMs
  • ParcPlace Smalltalk[Deutsch&Schiffman’84]
    • First modern VM
    • Introduced full-fledge JIT compiler
    • Demonstrated software-only VMs were viable
  • Self [Chambers&Ungar’91, Hölzle&Ungar’94]
    • Developed many advanced VM techniques
    • Introduced polymorphic inline caches, on-stack replacement, dynamic de-optimization, advanced selective optimization, type prediction and splitting, profile-directed inlining integrated with adaptive recompilation
quick history of vms2
Quick History of VMs
  • Java/JVM [Gosling, Joy, Steele ‘96]
    • First VM with mainstream market penetration
    • Java vendors embraced and improved Smalltalk and Self technology
    • Encouraged VM adoption by others → CLR
promise of dynamic optimization
Promise of Dynamic Optimization
  • Compilation tailored to current execution context performs better than ahead-of-time compiler
promise of dynamic optimization1
Promise of Dynamic Optimization
  • Common wisdom: C will always be better
  • Proof?
    • Not much
    • One interesting comparison: VM performace
      • HotSpot, J9, Apache DRLVM written in C
      • Jikes RVM, Java-in-Java
      • 1999: they performed with in 10%
      • 2007: Jikes RVM ~20% slower than HotSpot & J9, Jikes RVM ~60-0% faster Apache DRLVM
        • Aside: GCC code 20-10% slower than product compilers