Suitable Site for country house ( Yongsu -dong, Dong- gu , Daegu , Korea)

1. Suitable Site forcountry house(Yongsu-dong, Dong-gu, Daegu, Korea) 2006034284 이동구 2006034308 진경모 2008014026 허경진 2006014012 신영미 2007014013 손우재 2005014007 김은지 2008023011 송수정

2. Contents 1. Introduction 1.Background of study 2. Location requirements 3. An object of study area 2.Main Body • Digital map and thematic map extraction(by each layer) • Three dimensional analysis • Reclassification, weighting • Conversion : Raster to features • Final: Union 3.Conclusion • Best place • Worst place • Result value of Attribute data • Outcome

3. Background of study

4. Country house

5. Location requirements of country house Natural condition

6. Location requirements of country house Social conditions

7. Target area • Location : • Yongsu-dong, Dong-gu, • Daegu, Korea • Appraised value of land :

8. Analysis order Raster to feature Reclassify TIN to raster elegrid elegrid_ft elegrid_rec slope slpgrid_rec slpgrid_ft Create TIN from feature slpgrid union C A D F I L E Elevation TIN aspect aspgrid_rec aspgrid_ft aspgrid hillshade sungrid_rec sungrid_ft sungrid Dissolve FINAL stream stream_ft stream_rec house_rec house_ft house road_rec road_ft union road grave_rec grave_ft grave

9. Target area extraction of Numerical map

10. Thematic map extraction (by each layer) elevation

11. Thematic map extraction (by each layer) stream house grave road

12. Three dimensions analysis( making TIN)

13. Three dimensions analysis( getting a numerical value data) slopegrid elegrid elegrid sungrid aspgrid

14. Density thematic map graveden houseden

15. Separated distance thematic map about Road and river gravedis gravedis roaddis roaddis streamdis

16. Entity classification, weighting elerec Cell size - 3 Classify – 6 classes (Natural Breaks) sloprec sunrec

17. Entity classification, weighting Aspectrec

18. Entity classification, weighting graverec

19. Entity classification, weighting streamrec

20. Entity classification, weighting roadrec

21. Best place TM : 170731.30(E), 275087.01(N) Conversion into : 35.975586, 128.676122 (longitude & latitude)

22. Best place [Right side of the best place ] [Left side of the best place] Use : An orchard, water celery vinyl greenhouse

23. Worst place This area which is marked on the map is quite close to the optimal one. Actually, It’s hard to distinguish it without the red circle because it’s a very limited area. As you see, most of the bad sites are located on a steep slope or some of places are just beside mountain streams.

24. Worst place [Left side of worst place] [right side of worst place]

25. Surrounding areas There are country housing sites below the best place.

26. Attribute Data Table 최적지 Appraised value of land: 179,000/ m² The best Appraised value of land: 1,290/ m² The worst

27. conclusion

28. conclusion • Convenience - The optimal area is located on a main street of the town. • There is a supermarket, a bus-stop and senior citizen’s centre just behind the optimum.

29. conclusion 2. area - 4 houses on the area in the past. - So, If you are willing to build a garden-housing there, It will be enough size for 2 houses.

30. conclusion 3. Position • A wide panorama & Plenty of sunshine - Not that far from the city centre by a private car.

31. conclusion 4. Differences • The optimum is near the local people’s living area comparing with the garden-housings which are located in down town.

32. conclusion 5. Transportation - It’s difficult to get this area if you haven’t got own your car.

33. conclusion • So, It would be the best choice to build a country house in the best place.

34. conclusion • GIS is very convenient compared to the field survey. It can save time, money. • GIS provide very objective, accurate data • GIS can conclude many kinds of data • GIS is very practical study, so this can be used very widely. • Google Earth, GPS, Navigation -> Close relation to our real life