1 / 4

Working Case Analysis

Working Case Analysis. Sketch out points of disagreement. Narrow working proposition. Preliminary outline of points. Annotated bibliography of sources. Materials are due March 17. Reference Sources. Library catalogs: Books & library holdings Note: Opposing Viewpoints series and others

pisces
Download Presentation

Working Case Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Working Case Analysis • Sketch out points of disagreement. • Narrow working proposition. • Preliminary outline of points. • Annotated bibliography of sources. • Materials are due March 17.

  2. Reference Sources • Library catalogs: Books & library holdings • Note: Opposing Viewpoints series and others • Dictionaries (e.g., Black’s Law Dictionary) • Encyclopedias: General background • Online search engines and news sources • Indexes at MSJC: Recent, in-depth information (e.g., EBSCOHOST, ProQuest)

  3. References (Works Cited) • Book (author, title, city, publisher, date) • Henley, Patricia. The Hummingbird House. Denver: MacMurray, 1999. • Magazine (author, title, magazine, date, pages) • Poniewozik, James. "TV Makes a Too-Close Call." Time 20 Nov. 2000: 70-71. • Online (author, title, web page, date, organization, date of access, web address) • Poland, Dave. "The Hot Button." Roughcut. 26 Oct. 1998. Turner Network Television. 28 Oct. 1998 <http://www.roughcut.com>.

  4. Sample Annotation Johnson, B. R. “Concealed Weapons.” National Review 26 September 1994: 54-57 Mr. Johnson argues against the assault weapon ban in a recently passed crime bill. He argues that the banned weapons are similar to weapons which are not banned, that these weapons are used in an insignificant number of crimes, and that registration is the first step toward confiscation. Therefore, he gives strong evidence for a case against gun control.

More Related