1 / 1

INTRODUCTION

Effects of Biosolids Types on Nitrogen Availability under Varying Tillage Practices. Jinling Li ( jinling@vt.edu ), Gregory K. Evanylo and Xunzhong Zhang Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech. INTRODUCTION

pisces
Download Presentation

INTRODUCTION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effects of Biosolids Types on Nitrogen Availability under Varying Tillage Practices Jinling Li (jinling@vt.edu), Gregory K. Evanylo and Xunzhong Zhang Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech • INTRODUCTION • Reduced tillage on biosolids-amended land decreases runoff and erosion and increases infiltration and soil moisture. Little research has been conducted, however, on the effects of no-tillage on crop response nitrogen availability where biosolids are applied. • OBJECTIVE • To compare the interactive effects of land-applied biosolids types and tillage practices on soil and corn nitrogen availability in Coastal Plain agricultural soils. • METHODS • During 2009-2011, corn (ZeamaysL.) was grown as test crop on an Orangeburg loamy sand (Fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermicTypicKandiudults), in Sussex County, VA. • Experimental design: • Split-Plot Design • Main plot treatments: conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT). • Sub-plot treatments: commercial fertilizers (0x, 0.5x, 1x, 1.5x agronomic N rate), anaerobically digested biosolids (AD) and lime stabilized biosolids (LS) (1x agronomic N rate*). • Each treatment was replicated 4 times. • *1x agronomic N rate was based on estimated yield potential of 8.8 Mg ha-1 . • Sampling and analysis: • Pre-Sidedress Nitrogen Test (PSNT) • Corn Ear Leaf Nitrogen (ELN) • Corn grain yield • End-of-season Corn Nitrate Test (CSNT) Lime Stabilized Biosolids Biosolids Application Anaerobically Digested Biosolids PSNT Grain Yield CSNT • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION • PSNT • Biosolids maintained higher level of inorganic N than fertilizers in 2009; lower level than fertilizers in 2010; and equal level to fertilizers in 2011; LS maintained higher level than AD. • ELN • Biosolids maintained higher level of ear leaf N than fertilizers in 2009; lower level than fertilizers in 2010; and equal level to fertilizers in 2011; LS maintained higher level than AD. • CSNT • Biosolids maintained equal level of corn stalk nitrate N to fertilizers in 2009; in 2010, LS maintained higher level than fertilizers, but AD maintained lower level than fertilizers; and higher level than fertilizers in 2011. • Grain Yield • In 2009-2011, both biosolids produced higher grain yields than fertilizers; LS produced higher or equal level than AD. ELN Properties of land-applied biosolids in 2009-2011 • CONCLUSIONS • Tillage practices did not significantly influence biosolids Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN). • Biosolids PAN was reduced by drought up to silking (as assessed by PSNT and ELN) and increased by drought at end of season (CSNT).

More Related