Effects of Editorial Peer Review in Enhancing the Quality of Reports of Biomedical Studies - Phdassistance

1. Effects of Editorial PeerReview in Enhancing the Quality of Reports of BiomedicalStudies An Academic presentationby Dr. Nancy Agnes, Head, Technical Operations, Phdassistance Groupwww.phdassistance.com Email:info@phdassistance.com

2. TODAY'SDISCUSSION Introduction The use of peerreview Objectives Blinded peerreview Conclusion AboutPhdassistance

3. INTRODUCTION EditorialPeerReviewHelpsinimprovingthequalityof biological studyfindings. Editorial peer review is a mechanism that is used all over the world to evaluate and enhance the quality of submissions to biomedical journals, both print and electronic. Authors benefit from the assistance offered by reviewers and from the status conferred on them by publication in journals with high peer reviewstandards. This article conducted a review of existing evidence on the effectiveness of editorial peerreview. Contd...

4. Here are stated a few studies of reasonable quality, and most of these are concerned with the effects of blindingreviewers. Scientific findings must withstand critical review if they are to be accepted as valid, and Editorial peer review (critique, effort to disprove) is an essentialelement of a scientificprocess. From journal selection to its submission, Phdssistance supports authors at each step and gets their work ready to be submitted for publication in high standard journals. OurEditingSupportserviceisdesignedspeciallyforearly-stageresearchersto make the rigorous publication process simple andeasy.

5. THE USE OF PEERREVIEW Learned societies and journal editors usually rely on the views of independent (outside) content experts in making decisions on publication of submitted manuscriptsor presentation of reports atmeetings. This system of appraisal is known as peerreview. The use of peer review is generally expected to raise the quality of the end-product (i.e. the journal or scientific meeting) and to provide a mechanism for rational, fair and objective decision-making (Rennie 2003).

6. Surveys indicate that clinicians give greater credence to findings published in peer-reviewed journals , yet little attention is paid to the definition of peer review or effects of variations in review practices between journals (Godlee2003). If you want to improve the content of the dissertation through peer-reviewed and proofread by professionals, then you can contact Phdassistance Expert Peer review and Pre Submission Helpservice.

7. OBJECTIVES To estimate the effect of processes, or combinations of processes, in editorial peer review on the outcomes studied in the research on this topic. These processes are grouped as: different ways of screening submissions (i.e. carrying out a preliminary assessment of thesubmission) different ways of assigning submissions (i.e. choosing and assigning assessors to thesubmission) different ways of masking submissions (i.e. concealing the identity and background of the authors and/or the assessors)

9. different ways of eliciting internal opinions (i.e. opinions on the scientific quality of thesubmissionfrom those within the publishingorganisation) different ways of eliciting external opinions (i.e. opinions on the scientific quality of the submissions from those outside the publishingorganisation) different (group or single person) decision-making procedures (i.e. deciding whether to publish thesubmission) different types of feedback to author(s) and subsequent revision ofsubmissions a combination of the above or any other process that can be considered as editorial peerreview Contd...

10. The chances of your paper getting published solely depend on the selection of peer reviewer for yourpaper. Phdassistance peer reviewers provide high standard peer review which will help you in publishing in high standardjournals. Studies assessing the effect of blinding/masking on the quality of externalopinions

11. BLINDED PEERREVIEW The traditional method single-blind peerreview. of peer review is Reviewers are aware of authors, but authors are identities ofreviewers. the identities of the unaware of (In double-blind review neither the reviewers nor the writers know who is on the otherside.) Contd...

13. Your manuscript will be peer reviewed by Phdassistancesubject-matter experts who have experience in working with the top academic internationaljournals. They would help you in getting detailed review of your manuscript in areas that need improvement to match the journal standards forpublication.

14. Studiesassessingtheeffectsofsubmissionchecklistsontheoutcome

15. Studiesassessingtheeffectsofpeerreviewonstudyreportquality

16. CONCLUSION Peer review is an important component in improving the quality of scientific publications[1]. Most scientific journals incorporate it to help editors make judgments and improve the quality of published articles[4].

17. ABOUTPHDASSISTANCE Phdassistance experts evaluate every aspect of your work, including study design, research methods reporting, significance to the field of study, ethical conformity, and dataanalysis. They will also perform a thorough review of journal eligibility to reduce the possibilities ofrejection. Finally, you will obtain a report that includes information such as presentation clarity,organisation and structure, evidence, conclusion, and literature review quality.

18. CONTACTUS UNITEDKINGDOM +44-1143520021 INDIA +91-4448137070 EMAIL info@phdassistance.com