1 / 15

Beyond Peer Review

PLOS. Beyond Peer Review. Kristen Ratan ALA Annual Meeting 28 June 2014. ‪jakebeal.blogspot.com 320 × 255 Search by image. ‪ http:// jasonpriem.org /2010/10/ medline -literature-growth-chart/. Yes.

pepper
Download Presentation

Beyond Peer Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PLOS Beyond Peer Review Kristen Ratan ALA Annual Meeting 28 June 2014

  2. ‪jakebeal.blogspot.com320 × 255Search by image

  3. ‪http://jasonpriem.org/2010/10/medline-literature-growth-chart/‪http://jasonpriem.org/2010/10/medline-literature-growth-chart/

  4. Yes http://editorsupdate.elsevier.com/poll-results/pressure-grants-publish-driving-rise-unethical-practices-authors/

  5. “the inflated value given to publishing in a small number of so-called “high impact” journals has put pressure on authors to rush into print, cut corners, exaggerate their findings, and overstate the significance of their work.”

  6. PLOS ALM 12,288 comments over 124,897 articles

  7. ~2500 reviews/week in PLOS ONE

  8. Editor Reviewers Authors Pre-publication

  9. Continuous Evaluation Editor Reviewers Editor Editor Editor Reviewers Reviewers Reviewers Authors Authors Authors Authors Y2 Pre-publication Y1 Y3

  10. ALM Reportsalm.plos.org • Allows researchers, institutions& funders to: • create a report of the ALMs for a single or set of PLOS articles • view a summary of the metrics along with an accompanying set of data visualizations. • Search based on: • keyword • author name & country • affiliation • publication date • subject areas • funder

  11. Open Evaluation: Importance to Science & Shared Knowledge This work makes little to no contribution to science knowledge This work makes a significant contribution to science knowledge This work makes a minor contribution to the field of study This work advances the field If the user selects either of these two options, display the following: If the user selects either of these two options, display the following: I think this work was not worth doing • This work is a major scientific breakthrough • This work has an important or novel method • This work will lead to reinterpretation of well- • established findings • This work opens a new area of inquiry in the field • This work has an important or significant conclusion:

More Related