350 likes | 434 Views
This study focuses on developers selecting classification schemes, distance attenuation, site terms, and key data issues, exploring various models and parameters for ground motion analysis. The aspects of oversaturation, aspects ratios, and fault types are investigated to assess their impact on medians and standard deviations.
E N D
Developer Scope • Ground Motion Model (median, standard dev) • Ground Motion Parameters: • Horizontal components (Ave Horiz, FN, and FP) • PGA, PGV, PGD • Pseudo spectral acc at 5% damping: 0-10 sec • Applicable Magnitude Range: • 5.0 - 8.5 (SS) • 5.0 - 8.0 (RV) • Applicable Distance Range: • 0 - 200 km • Fault Types • Strike-slip, Reverse, Normal • Site Classification Scheme • Developers select their preferred classification scheme • Need not include soft-soil
Key Issues • Oversaturation • Is it due to the aspect ratio, or the magnitude? • Use of Aspect ratio • Are aspect ratios used in NGA consistent with aspect ratios currently used in hazard analyses? • Correlation with style-of-faulting • Dependence on dip • Is this dip effects or a regional effect?
Key Changes from Previous Models • Site classification • Vs30 • Depth of soil term (Z1.0 or Z1.5) • Source • Oversaturation with magnitude • Aspect ratio as a key parameter • Non-linear site response • Based on median rock PGA including event term
T=1 sec Vs=600 C&Y w/o AR
T=1 sec SS Vs=600 C&B w/o AR
T=1 sec SS Vs=600 A&S AR<=2
T=1 sec SS Vs=600 A&S
PGA Hazard Vs=600 Site near Hayward Fault (2 km)
T=1 sec Hazard Vs=600 Site near Hayward Fault (2 km)
PGA Hazard Vs=600 Site near San Andreas Fault (2 km)
T=1 Sec, Hazard Vs=600 Site near San Andreas Fault (2 km)