OBJECTIONS TO THE IDEA OF MIRACLES.
Everything in our common experience tells us that when we encounter highly complex, organized systems or information, they are the result of thoughtful design. Therefore it is reasonable to infer that when we encounter the same in biology or other sciences they too are the result of thoughtful design
Science can only study events and entities that have a natural explanation
Science cannot explore the miraculous because science can only study that which is repeatable and regular
Is a worldview that includes miracles any less scientific than one than one that doesn’t?