1 / 25

Current Status and Prospect of KORAIL Global Logistics Business

G R F C 2007. Current Status and Prospect of KORAIL Global Logistics Business. Kang, Gil-Hyun Senior Executive Director & Chairman, WCRR2008. March 23 2007. Contents. Current Status Trend of Korean Import Export Logistics Status and Potential of Inter-continental Corridors

pavel
Download Presentation

Current Status and Prospect of KORAIL Global Logistics Business

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. G R F C 2007 Current Status and Prospect of KORAIL Global Logistics Business Kang, Gil-Hyun Senior Executive Director & Chairman, WCRR2008 March 23 2007

  2. Contents Current Status Trend of Korean Import Export Logistics Status and Potential of Inter-continental Corridors Rail Infrastructure for Asian Landbridge 2

  3. 1. Current Status of Logistics Business • Overview of Railway Logistics (as of 2006) • Status and Prospect of Railway Logistics freight Traffic Freight Traffic (10 thousand ton) Revenue (100 million KRW) 3

  4. 1. Current Status of Logistics Business • Freight Transport and Prospect ( land 6070%, sea 1020% ) ⇒ For the last 30 years, road extension rose by about 8times while rail remained with a only 1.5 time growth. 4

  5. 1. Current Status of Logistics Business • In-land Traffic Volume (by Lines) Total traffic Volume 41,670,000 ton 2% decrease in last 5 years(Yearly average) Inland traffic concentrated in Seoul-Ulsan-Busan Line 남부기지 over 8 million ton 6~7 million ton 5 million ton 13% Bukpyung Gwangyang Gwangyang Steel Yeocheon Southern Freight Youngdong Central 3~4 million ton 3% 3% 2~2.5 million ton Thousand ton As of 2005 3% 괴동선 3% 1~1.5 million ton 4% 장생포 5% 5% 9% 12% 우암선 광양제철선 17% 여천선 19% 광양항선 5

  6. over 8 million ton 6~7 million ton 5 million ton 3~4 million ton 2~2.5 million ton Increase rate 1~1.5 million ton △4.1% 6.6% △2.2% △4.8% △1.9% △16.2% △5.6% 1. Current Status of Logistics Business • In-land Traffic Volume (by Items) • Cement, Container, Coal, &Fertilizer are the main items of Freight Transport • Only Container traffic Increased Ttraffic Volume by items (as of 2005, thousand ton) 남부기지 괴동선 장생포 우암선 광양제철선 여천선 광양항선 6

  7. 1. Current Status of Logistics Business • Traffic volume and Main items of Major Harbors • About 80% of container traffic volume is handled in Busan, Gwangyang, Ulsan, and Incheon harbor. • Rail traffic share is 10% at Busan, 20% in Gwangyang harbor Container Traffic Volume at Kwangyang Harbor (by modes) Container Traffic Volume at Busan Harbor (by modes) (Busan harbor) 2005 (Kwangyang Harbor) 2005 Container Traffic Volume by major harbors Increased by 8.8 % Yearly 8% 9% 78% 7

  8. 2. Trend of Korean Import Export Logistics • Evolution of Asia’s port throughput In the matter of cost, Asia accounts for about 18% of the world import –export volume, and Korea takes up about 16% of Asian export volume. In the Asian region, Northeastern Asia takes a high proportion. 17% of World 17% of Asia Source : Review of Developments in Transport in Asia and the Pacific (2005) Unit : USS Million 8

  9. 2. Trend of Korean Import Export Logistics • Port throughput by continents (Cargo volume of import and export) Import by continent Other Area Africa South America Oceania North America Europe Middle East Asia Weight ( 1000 ton) sum ( million USD) Export by continent Export: 118 million ton (284 billion USD) Import: 399 million ton (261 billion USD) Surplus : 23 billion USD (2005) Other Area Africa South America Oceania North America Europe Middle East Asia Weight ( 1000 ton) sum ( million USD) 9

  10. 2. Trend of Korean Import Export Logistics • Trend Import Export Volume by Country Export to Major Countries sum ( million USD) Weight ( 1000 ton) Busan New Harbor Import from Major Countries The major exporter and importer, the U.S. Japan, and China Take up about 46%. The trade with the U.S. and China record surplus with $30.5bil. and S23.2bil. Respectively but with Japan, $24.3bil. Deficit is recorded. sum ( million USD) Weight ( 1000 ton) Source : KMI 10

  11. Exp Imp 2. Trend of Korean Import Export Logistics • Import Export Trend by Major Harbors Busan port is one of the 5 ports in the world now, dealing with about 80% of the total container export volume, and as a terminal of Asian Landbridge, it will play an important role with the future TKR connection. Source : KMI 2006 Container Handling of Worlds’ 5 Biggest Harbors Ulsan Etc. 22% 28% Gwangyang Busan Incheon 20% 17% 13% Export 14,904 Import 10,661 9,098 Unit: 10,000ton 6,672 6,192 5,540 4,675 3,708 2,717 1,596 Busan Ulsan Gwangyang Incheon Etc. 11

  12. 2. Trend of Korean Import Export Logistics • Container Export through Busan Harbor 12

  13. Vanino Vanino 7% 2% Busan Busan To Korsakov Port From Banino 26% 3% 22% Sokcho Busan Busan From Vladivostok To Vladivostok Ulsan Ulsan Busan Busan Masan Masan GY GY The2005 record of export /import volume by port 3. Status and Potential of Inter-continental Corridors • Import/Export Volume to Fareast Russia : (TSR) Export Volume(160000 TEU) Share by Harbors Apportioned rate of import volume [127000 TEU] by port 7% Busan From Korshakov Ulsan Busan Masan Gwangyang Ulsan Busan Masan Gwangyang From Vostonich To Vostochiny Port Banino 2% 7% Export Import Corshakov Vladivostok Vostonich 29% 62% Source : Korea Customs Service Vostonich Vladivostok Korshakov Banino 13

  14. 3. Status and Potential of Inter-continental Corridors • Current Status and Prospect of TSR Traffic Volume (1,000 TEU) ㅇ In case of Korea, it showed 26% average growth from 2000-2004, but following the TSR charge rise[30%] after 2005, the volume is on the declining trend. (For each FEU from Busan to Finland : $3500~39004600~5000) - Charge adjustment and condition improvement was reflected from Feb. 2007, the volume is expected to increase in 2007. ㅇ If competitiveness on freight charge on sea transportation, improvement of logistics infrastructure such as freight car supply and port facility expansion, and simplification of customs could be acquired to optimize the TSR route, the volume is expected to increase by 700,000 TEU for the future. 14

  15. 3. Status and Potential of Inter-continental Corridors • Rail-Ship-Rail Complex Logistics Business (Korea-Japan) TSR TMR TMGR TCR Current Main Route ㅇ Mainly by Surface (TKR is not linked yet) ㅇ Main route : Busan, Gwangyang  Vostonich  TSR ㅇ Other route : Incheon, PyeongTaek  China  TCR ㅇ TSR Corridor : Korea65%, China30%, Japan5% Korea(electronics), China(clothing), Japan(Carpart) Comparison between TSR and Sea route (based on 1 FEU) 15

  16. Sokcho Port 의정부 Donghae Port 서울 인천 사북 수원 제천 영주 조치원 예산 대전 The new Pocheol Harbor 김천 호남선 경부선 군산 Pocheol Harbor KunJang Port 익산 영천 대구 전주 The new Ulsan Port 삼랑진 한림정 부전 광양항 진영 Busan Port 송정리 The new Pusan Port 순천 보성 여수 The new Mokpo Port 4. Rail Infrastructure for Asian Landbridge • Building Rail Infrastructure link with Shipping ［Port connection railway • The new Busan port and Kwangyang port was completed with the branch line. < The plan to build high-speed logistics railway network> 16

  17. 보성 4. Rail Infrastructure for Asian Landbridge • To build rail-exclusive CY and integrated freight terminal Integrated freight terminal Rail exclusive CY • Under operation : 3 integrated terminals: Gunpo, EuiwangICD(’93)Yangsan(’00)Jangsung(’05) • Under construction : 3 integrated terminals-Cheongwon(’09), Chilgok(‘09), Paju(’11) Susaek Station Integrated logistics base 100,000TEU container Northern Metropolitan (Paju) 의정부 3mil. Ton of General freight 서울 인천 Metropolitan (Gunpo, EuiWang) 사북 수원 5mil.ton 제천 Youngnam Region(Chilgok) Central Region(Chungwon, Yeongi) 영주 3.6mil.ton 2mil.ton 조치원 예산 대전 Gumi Rail CY , Yakmok station 4mil. ton 김천 호남선 170,000TEU 경부선 Busan (Yangsan) 군산 익산 영천 대구 Honam Region(JangSung) 전주 Busan Port 5mil.ton Hanam station CY 삼랑진 한림정 150,000TEU 부전 진영 Kwangyang Port 송정리 순천 Sinchangwon station CY 여수 150,000TEU 17

  18. Goyang Deport Seoul Seoul Siheung KwangMyung CheonanAsan Daejeon Daejonjochajang SeoDaejon Dongdaegu Okchun Dongdaegu Shindong Iksan Gyeongju Gwangju Sonjungri Busan Routes Mokpo Phase 1 Phase 2 4. Rail Infrastructure for Asian Landbridge • To increase the capacity of Kyeongbu line in the case of the 2nd phase KTX ㅇContainer transportation volume of Kyeongbu line container is around 660,000TEU ㅇ If operation is done centering on CVL cargo train after the 2nd phase KTX in 2011, 1.9mil. TEU at maximum can be transported. The remaining capacity of 38times from Suwon to Chonan could be used to operate 54 trains, with one-way trip daily. (round trip 108 trains *30 cars*2TEU*300day=1.94mil. TEU) ㅇ To bolster logistics infrastructure of Kyeongbu likne, expansion of CY and to use continuous welded rail [CWR] will be proceeded together. Expansion of CY (Centering on Yakmok, Sojeongri, and Hwadeok CY) // CWR: main line clearance distance : increased 400~500M  600M

  19. 5,848 6,795 Route of North→South Volume 80~90% 13% average growth yearly 10~15% 1~5% 1%이하 2.8% 1.7% 87% 3% 4. Rail Infrastructure for Asian Landbridge • Cargo volume between North Korea and South Korea (Size of trade and trend of cargo volume) Trend of Variation on inter-Korea trade amount by year The trend of cargo volume by year [ship] 1000 ton South  North North  South Total Volume 19

  20. 4. Rail Infrastructure for Asian Landbridge • To promote the inter-Korean railway connection Russia China Dorasan Station Jaejin Station • Connection of track and station construction of Kyeongui line(Dorasan-Kaesung), and Donghaeline(Jaejin-Kumkangsan) is mostly completed. • To promote trail operation of train and full commencement for commercial operation in the future. 20

  21. 4. Rail Infrastructure for Asian Landbridge • To introduce the rail-sea-rail international integrated transport business between Korea and Japan ㅇ To promote connected transportation through the strategic alliance between KORAIL, JR Freight, ltd. And ship builders ㅇ Using 12’container, on-time transportation between Seoul and Tokyo within 60 hrs. [5days by sea] ㅇ Trial transportation in ’07 and commercial operation in Apr. ’07 is planned. Korea Japan UIWANG ICD Tokyo 8hrs by sea (18hrs) JR 22hrs ( 5hrs for custom clearance) OSAKA Busanjin Station CY • Seoul(Euiwang) →Busan (rail transport : 6hrs) - Shuttle, Clearance, Shipment : 18H • Busan →Hakada (by sea : 8hrs) - loading, clearance, Shuttle : 5H • Hakada → Tokyo (rail transport: 22hrs Korail 6hrs HAKATA 21

  22. 4. Rail Infrastructure for Asian Landbridge □ On-discussion Business between Korea to China (Train ferry project between Korea-China) ㅇ Target Section: To review the promotion of the train ferry project between Incheon, [Pyeongtak]-YeonTae[Wihae], China Incheon Harbor Pyungtaek Harbor □ Project in Feasibility Study (Undersea Tunnel Korea-Japan) ㅇ A Large scale project between Kyushu ~ Iki Island ~ Tsushima Island ~ Guejae Island (235km) Route Plan of K-J Undersea Tunnel Busan Korea Tsushima Masan Japan Iki Guejae Karatsu 22

  23. 4. Rail Infrastructure for Asian Landbridge • To estmiate demand in connection of inter-Korean and Continental railway ㅇ Freight Transportation volume (unit: 1,000ton/yearly) ※ Source: Korea Traffic Research Center <Research on traffic demand and cost analysis on inter-Korean railway>, 2005 Dream of Asian Landbridge 23

  24. WCRR 2008 in Seoul 8th World Congress on Railway Research May 18 ~22 Seoul, Korea Please Submit Abstract by May 16, 2007

  25. Thank you !

More Related