1 / 11

754A

754A . Research Methods. Guba Pardigm Dialogic. Positivism: realist, dualist/objectivist, experimental/manipulative Postpositivism : critical realist, modified objectivist, modified experimental/manipulative, natural setting Constructivism: relativist, subjectivist, hermeneutic, dialectic

paulos
Download Presentation

754A

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 754A Research Methods

  2. GubaPardigm Dialogic • Positivism: realist, dualist/objectivist, experimental/manipulative • Postpositivism: critical realist, modified objectivist, modified experimental/manipulative, natural setting • Constructivism: relativist, subjectivist, hermeneutic, dialectic Guba,E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, Ca. SAGE Publications, Inc.

  3. Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (2010). Designing qualitative research. Fifth edition. Sage Publications. Pg. 45

  4. Method, Data Collection & Analysis

  5. Research Steps

  6. Narrative Epistemological Stance • “Narrative research studies the whole person in context and examines whole lives. Stories convey information in a present time sense and include a felt sense, giving new perspectives and clarity to understanding experiences. The patterns of these experiences become apparent. Storytelling taps unconscious emotional material and memories that contain salient content about an event(Nelson et al, 2008, pg. 2).”

  7. Narrative Data Collection Written Narrative Task Within a 30 min time frame, the youth were asked to write a short narrative about a vivid experience that they had experienced in the program. This task was based on a 130 Child Youth Care Forum (2008) 37:127–137 123 methodology used by Morrill et al. (2000). RAs gave participants pencils and papers. The instructions were the following: Think back to a time you were participating in ____________ (name of program) that really stands out to you. A time or an event that is very vivid. Where were you? What was happening? Who else was there? What did you feel about what was happening? How has participating in _________ helped or changed you and changed your family or community?

  8. Example of Content Categorical Analysis-Major Themes Storytelling Narratives, Nelson et al

  9. Storytelling Protocol • 1. Name of main character • 2. Type of character (examples: hero, priest, princess, monster, prince, queen, artist, • painter, movie star, handsome, father, fool, magician, elder, warrior, priestess, • wizard, learner, king, scholar, musician, writer, beauty, mother, teacher, rebel, child, • wise person, or make up your own). • 3. Color associated with character. • 4. How old? • 5. Gender? • 6. Ethnicity, culture or race? • 7. Language spoken at home? • 8. Characteristics of character? (examples: brave, inquisitive, curious, deep, wounded, • caring, musical, ugly, open knowledgeable, innocent, strong, wise, vulnerable, • insecure, loving, creative, afraid, angry, wondering, foolish, trusting, or make up • your own) • 9. What was character like before ___________ (name of program)? At school? At • home? • 10. What was difficult for character in the ___________ (name of program)? • 11. What has helped with the difficulty? (could be other people, something inside the • character) • 12. What is the character like now? At school? At home? • 13. How does the character affect the community around him or her?

  10. Storytelling Results

  11. Character Transformation

More Related