1 / 38

Central Laboratory for Agricultural Climate (CLAC) Methodology of Studying the Impact of Climate Change on Crop Produc

Central Laboratory for Agricultural Climate (CLAC) Methodology of Studying the Impact of Climate Change on Crop Productivity By Dr. Mahmoud Medany Dakkar, 24 March 2004 . DSSAT CLAC. Integrated Crop Management Information System by using DSSAT program . Who Uses DSSAT Tools?.

paul2
Download Presentation

Central Laboratory for Agricultural Climate (CLAC) Methodology of Studying the Impact of Climate Change on Crop Produc

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Central Laboratory for Agricultural Climate (CLAC) Methodology of Studying the Impact of Climate Change on Crop Productivity By Dr. Mahmoud Medany Dakkar, 24 March 2004

  2. DSSAT CLAC Integrated Crop Management Information System by using DSSAT program

  3. Who Uses DSSAT Tools? • Agronomic Researchers and Extension Specialists • Policy Makers • Farmers and their Advisors • Private Sector • Educators

  4. The program presents a table that includes fertilizer N added , N taken up by crop, N leached below 1.8m, and final Nitrate –N in soil (Kg/ha) and grain yield of crop (Kg/ha) for that run

  5. DSSAT was designed to allow users to : • Input, organize and store data on crop, soil and weather “data base”· • Retrieve, analyze and display data. • Calibrate and evaluate crop growth models. • Evaluate different management practices and compare simulation results with their own measured results to give them confidence that models work adequately. • DSSAT allow users to simulate option for crop management over a number of years to assess the risks associated with each option. • Create different management strategies and the simulated performance indicators that can be analyzed.

  6. Applications of Crop Models • Based on understanding of plants, soil, weather and management interactions • Predict crop growth, yield, timing (Outputs) • Optimize Management using Climate Predictions • Diagnose Yield Gaps, Actual vs. Potential • Optimize Irrigation Management • Greenhouse Climate Control • Quantify Pest Damage Effects on Production • Precision Farming • Climate Change Effects on Crop Production • Can be used to perform “what-if” experiments on the computer to optimize management

  7. Updating Growth Masst+1 = Masst + Growtht - Abortt Daily Increase in Dry Matter Growth: Photosynthesis and Respiration Daily Growth = CVF * Gross Photosynthesis - Respiration or dW/dt = CVF * ((30/44) * A - MC * W) dW/dt = Plant Growth Rate, g m-2 s -1 CVF = Conversion Efficiency, g tissue (g glucose)-1 30/44 = Converts CO2 into Glucose, g glucose (g CO2 )-1 A = Gross Photosynthesis, g [CO2] m-2 s -1 MC = Maintenance Respiration Coefficient, s -1 W = Plant Tissue Mass, g m-2

  8. Conversion Factor (CVF) 1/CVF= fleaf/0.68 + fstem/0.66 + froot/0.68 + fstorage /Co CVF= Conversion factor (g product g-1glucose) f = Fraction of each organ in the increase in total dry matter (f=1) Co = Conversion factor of storage organ (g product g-1glucose) For example, Co is 0.67 for maize, 0.78 for potato, 0.46 for soybean, and 0.40 for peanut.

  9. Soil Water Management N Application + Organic Crop (Genetic Coefficients ) Weather Temperature Photoperiod Duration of Phases Development Photosynthesis Respiration Mass of Crop Kg/ha Growth Partitioning CO2 Leaf Stem Root Fruit

  10. INPUTS File x ExperimentalData File File S Soil Data File w Weather Data File C Cultivar Code Crop Models File T Crop Data during season File A Crop Data at Harvest Output Depending on Option Setting and Simulation Application

  11. Soil analysis and fertility measurements Seventy different soil location were chosen and soil properties were determined as follow: -Soil physical conditions of the profile by layer. - Soil chemical conditions of the profile by layer - Sand, Clay& Silt % . - Organic carbon. - Coarse fraction < 2mm,% of whole soil. - pH of soil. - Soil classification. - Soil horizon. - Root abundance information. - Slope %. - Soil color. - Permeability code. - Drainage. - Latitude - Longitude - Soil texture - Number of layer - Bulk density 1/3 bar (g/cm3) - % Total nitrogen - CEC

  12. Historical weather data: Thirty-five years of weather data for different experimental locations have already been collected.   The minimum required weather data includes: -Latitude and longitude of the weather station, . -Daily values of incoming solar radiation (MJ/m²-day), -Maximum and minimum air temperature (°C), and -Rainfall (mm).

  13. MAIZE GENOTYPE COEFFICIENTS COEFF DEFINITIONS VAR# Identification code or number for a specific cultivar VAR-NAME Name of cultivar ECO# Ecotype code or this cultivar, points to the Ecotype in the ECO file (currently not used). P1 Thermal time from seedling emergence to the end of the juvenile phase (expressed in degree days above a base temperature of 8ّ C(during which the plant is not responsive to changes in photoperiod. P2 Extent to which development (expressed as days) is delayed for each hour increase in photoperiod above the longest photoperiod at which development proceeds at a maximum rate (which is considered to be 12.5 hours). P5 Thermal time from silking to physiological maturity (expressed in degree days above a base temperature of 8ّC). G2 Maximum possible number of kernels per plant. G3 Kernel filling rate during the linear grain filling stage and under optimum conditions (mg/day). PHINT Phylochron interval; the interval in thermal time (degree days)between successive leaf tip appearances. @VAR# VRNAME.......... ECO# P1 P2 P5 G2 G3 PHINT EG0011 S.C. 9 IB0001 400.0 0.200 620.0 650.0 11.4 40.00 EG0004 SC 10 IB0001 400.0 0.300 865.0 720.0 11.5 38.90 EG0013 S.C-103 IB0001 295.0 0.520 593.0 695.0 13.4 38.90 EG0007 S.C-122 IB0001 270.0 0.500 580.0 650.0 13.6 38.90 EG0008 S.C-124 IB0001 290.0 0.500 630.0 630.0 14.8 38.90 EG0002 T.W.C.310 IB0001 430.0 0.200 868.0 700.0 10.0 40.00 EG0014 T.W.C.323 IB0001 290.0 0.300 680.0 635.0 12.2 38.90

  14. Genetic Coefficients Genetic Coefficients for each variety affected by: • Life cycle • Photosynthesis • Sensitivity to day light(photoperiod) • Leaf area • Partitioning • Re-mobilization • Seed growth • Seed composition • Seed fill duration • Vernalization • Growing degree days accumulation

  15. Crop Development Vegetative Growth Period Reproductive Growth Period Harvest Maturity Phys. Maturity Plant Emerge 1st Flower 1st Seed Time • Vegetative Development is mainly affected by Temperature such as appearance of leaves on main stem) • Reproductive Development is affected by temperature and daylength (such as duration of seed growth phase) • Sensitivity to stresses varies considerably with stage of growth • Crop growth in simulation modeling usually refers to the accumulation of biomass with time and its partitioning different organs.

  16. Adapting the DSSAT to our conditions we use the following procedures • Conduct field experiments to collect minimum data set required to running and evaluating crop model under Egypt condition. • Enter other input soil data for the region and historical weather data for sites in the region(not start calibration of crop parameters before checking the quality of weather data). • Run the model to evaluate the ability of model to predict • Modify model to evaluation shows that it does not reach the level of precision required. • Conduct sensitivity analysis on the crop models to evaluate the modal responses to alternative practices using variances, water use, season length, nitrogen uptake, net profit and other responses. • Provide results and recommendations for decision-making . • Output can be printed or graphically displayed for conducting sensitivity analysis.

  17. Modelvalidation Experimental data Other inputs Parameter test DSSAT program Simulation Compare simulation with measured Modification model Conduct sensitivity analysis on the crop models to evaluate the modal

  18. Building New Software for Data Entry

  19. Wheat

  20. *RUN 6 : GIZA 164 MODEL : GECER980 - WHEAT EXPERIMENT : EGDK9101 WH DK&BN TREATMENT 6 : GIZA 164 CROP : WHEAT CULTIVAR : GIZA 164 - STARTING DATE : NOV 20 1991 PLANTING DATE : NOV 20 1991 PLANTS/m2 :110.0 ROW SPACING : 20.cm WEATHER : EGNA 1991 SOIL : EGNA870001 TEXTURE : CL - SIDS SOIL INITIAL C : DEPTH:120cm EXTR. H2O:148.6mm NO3: 1.6kg/ha NH4: 1.6kg/ha WATER BALANCE : IRRIGATE ON REPORTED DATE(S) IRRIGATION : 380 mm IN 5 APPLICATIONS NITROGEN BAL. : SOIL-N & N-UPTAKE SIMULATION; NO N-FIXATION N-FERTILIZER : 150 kg/ha IN 2 APPLICATIONS RESIDUE/MANURE : INITIAL : 0 kg/ha ; 0 kg/ha IN 0 APPLICATIONS ENVIRONM. OPT. : DAYL= .00 SRAD= .00 TMAX= .00 TMIN= .00 RAIN= .00 CO2 = R330.00 DEW = .00 WIND= .00 SIMULATION OPT : WATER :Y NITROGEN:Y N-FIX:N PESTS :N PHOTO :C ET :R MANAGEMENT OPT : PLANTING:R IRRIG :R FERT :R RESIDUE:R HARVEST:M WTH:M

  21. *SUMMARY OF SOIL AND GENETIC INPUT PARAMETERS SOIL LOWER UPPER SAT EXTR INIT ROOT BULK pH NO3 NH4 ORG DEPTH LIMIT LIMIT SW SW SW DIST DENS C cm cm3/cm3 cm3/cm3 cm3/cm3 g/cm3 ugN/g ugN/g % -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0- 5 .170 .299 .388 .129 .299 .35 1.40 7.80 .10 .10 1.20 5- 15 .170 .299 .388 .129 .299 .35 1.40 7.80 .10 .10 1.20 15- 30 .170 .299 .388 .129 .299 .35 1.40 7.80 .10 .10 1.20 30- 45 .243 .367 .382 .124 .367 .20 1.30 7.80 .10 .10 .50 45- 60 .238 .360 .375 .122 .360 .17 1.30 7.87 .10 .10 .30 60- 90 .241 .362 .377 .121 .362 .13 1.30 7.90 .10 .10 .17 90-120 .250 .372 .387 .122 .372 .10 1.30 7.90 .10 .10 .10 ENVIRONMENTAL AND STRESS FACTORS ------------------------------------ENVIRONMENT-----------------STRESS---------- |--DEVELOPMENT PHASE--|-TIME-|-------WEATHER--------| |---WATER--| |-NITROGEN-| DURA TEMP TEMP SOLAR PHOTOP PHOTO GROWTH PHOTO GROWTH TION MAX MIN RAD [day] SYNTH SYNTH days ّC ّC MJ/m2 hr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Emergence - Term Spiklt 59 23.31 10.02 15.47 10.24 .000 .006 .271 .473 End Veg-Beg Ear Growth 21 23.58 6.84 15.41 10.78 .000 .000 .000 .302 Begin Ear-End Ear Grwth 13 25.05 8.08 16.41 11.23 .000 .037 .000 .217 End Ear Grth-Beg Grn Fi 14 28.36 13.23 17.40 11.62 .010 .074 .000 .000 Linear Grain Fill Phase 39 32.11 14.68 17.04 12.41 .093 .141 .000 .015

  22. *SIMULATED CROP AND SOIL STATUS AT MAIN DEVELOPMENT STAGES RUN NO. 6 GIZA 164 DATE CROP GROWTH BIOMASS LAI LEAF ET RAIN IRRIG SWATER CROP N STRESS AGE STAGE kg/ha NUM. mm mm mm mm kg/ha % H2O N -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20 NOV 0 Sowing 0 .00 .0 4 0 70 177 0 .0 .00 .00 20 NOV 0 Start Sim 0 .00 .0 4 0 70 177 0 .0 .00 .00 21 NOV 1 Germinate 0 .00 .0 8 0 70 167 0 .0 .00 .00 30 NOV 10 Emergence 14 .00 2.0 19 0 70 140 0 2.2 .00 .00 28 JAN 69 Term Spklt 2148 2.24 12.0 117 6 225 155 82 3.8 .01 .27 18 FEB 90 End Veg 5488 3.24 15.0 182 11 225 94 132 2.4 .00 .00 2 MAR 103 End Ear Gr 7701 3.06 15.0 226 11 225 50 134 1.7 .06 .00 16 MAR 117 Beg Gr Fil 10037 2.71 15.0 279 13 305 78 133 1.3 .05 .00 25 APR 157 Maturity 12189 .00 15.0 391 17 380 46 142 1.2 .14 .00 25 APR 157 Harvest 12189 .00 15.0 391 17 380 46 142 1.2 .14 .00

  23. *MAIN GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT VARIABLES @ VARIABLE PREDICTED MEASURED -------- --------- -------- FLOWERING DATE (dap) 108 106 PHYSIOL. MATURITY (dap) 157 158 GRAIN YIELD (kg/ha;dry) 5064 5063 WT. PER GRAIN (g;dry) .0364 0.038 GRAIN NUMBER (GRAIN/m2) 13917 -99 GRAINS/EAR 29.8 -99 MAXIMUM LAI (m2/m2) 3.25 -99 BIOMASS (kg/ha) AT ANTHESIS 7701 -99 BIOMASS N (kg N/ha) AT ANTHESIS 134 -99 BIOMASS (kg/ha) AT HARVEST MAT. 12189 12302 STALK (kg/ha) AT HARVEST MAT. 7125 -99 HARVEST INDEX (kg/kg) .415 -99 FINAL LEAF NUMBER 15.00 -99 GRAIN N (kg N/ha) 122 -99 BIOMASS N (kg N/ha) 142 -99 STALK N (kg N/ha) 20 -99 SEED N (%) 2.41 -99

  24. Comparison of measured and predicted of Wheat grain yield

  25. OBSERVED AND SIMULATED WHEAT GRAIN YIELD 9000 2 8000 R = 0 . 901 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 Simulated grain yield Observed grain yield

  26. DSSAT v3.5- Models of 16 Crops - • Cereals • Corn, Wheat, Rice, Barley, Sorghum, Millet • Grain Legumes • Soybean, Peanut, Dry Bean, Chickpea • Root Crops • Potato, Cassava • Other Crops • Tomato, Sunflower, Sugar Cane, Pasture

  27. GIS map showing analysis grain yield simulation of Maize single cross 10 in different location.

  28. THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON PRODUCTION OF DIFFERERENT CULTIVARS OF MAIZE (Zea mays L.) Minia Governorate, Malawi

  29. Fertilizer levels, additions date and amounts Material code (1) = Ammonium nitrate Method code (2) = Broadcast, incorporate

  30. Combination between varieties and nitrogen levels Variety V1: SC10 (Single cross 10) V2: TW310 (Three way cross 310)

  31. Temperature , precipitation and solar radiation for the current (CO2=300ppm ) and the expected change situation(CO2=600ppm) by the year 2040.

  32. Summary of data produced by the program and compared yield for measured data. Fert. N = Fertilizer N added (Kg/ha) Plant N = N taken up by croup (Kg/ha) Leached N = N leached below 1.8m(Kg/ha) Final N = Final Nitrate –N in soil (Kg/ha) Yield = Grain yield of crop (Kg/ha)

  33. Thank You!

More Related