Wave sediment transport Bed load beneath symmetrical and asymmetrical waves  Shields criterion, derived for steady flo

1 / 26

# Wave sediment transport Bed load beneath symmetrical and asymmetrical waves  Shields criterion, derived for steady flo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Wave sediment transport Bed load beneath symmetrical and asymmetrical waves  Shields criterion, derived for steady flow, remains applicable Horizontal velocity above a rippled seabed during a 10-minute period.  oscillating transport can appear as almost ‘continuous’

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## Wave sediment transport Bed load beneath symmetrical and asymmetrical waves  Shields criterion, derived for steady flo

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Wave sediment transport

Bed load beneath symmetrical and asymmetrical waves

 Shields criterion, derived for steady flow, remains applicable

Horizontal velocity above a rippled seabed during a 10-minute period.

 oscillating transport can appear as almost ‘continuous’

 empirical transport rate formulae for steady flow may be applied instant by instant through wave cycle

 time-averaging results gives net sand transport rate

 for symmetrical waves no net motion

Regions of validity for various wave theories:

H = wave height, h = water depth

T = wave period

g = accel. due to gravity

Stokes 2nd-order theory: most usually applied in ‘intermediate’ or ‘transitional’ water depth

• correction 2to linear wave profile 1of magnitude proportional to wave steepness (ak)

The near-bed velocity amplitude (first harmonic) for a sinusoidal wave is given by:

where a = H/2 = amplitude of surface elevation

The corresponding peak Shields parameter during the wave cycle is:

Using Soulsby’s (1997) friction factor:

yields the peak Shields parameter (skin friction) for a sine wave as:

Beneath asymmetrical (Stokes 2nd Order) waves the velocity, and hence bed shear stress, are asymmetrical:

The wave velocity may be expressed:

where the asymmetry

parameter W is given by:

We now make the assumption of quasi-steadiness with regard to the bed shear stress and assume that the instantaneous Shields parameter is given by:

• What is the net bed load sediment transport rate?

For sheet flow conditions assume that θ>>θcr such that the Einstein parameter becomes: and hence

Using this simplified formula the time-mean or net bed load transport, Qb, can be expressed as:

show that the net bed load transport rate is given by:

This shows that the net bed load transport rate is proportional to the asymmetry parameter W. Recall that the result has neglected the threshold of sediment motion.

Suspended load beneath symmetrical and asymmetrical waves

• entrainment occurs above

both rippled and plane beds

(i) Oscillating sheet flow measured with conductivity concentration meter (CCM)

Large symmetrical waves:

U0 = 1.7 ms-1

T = 7.2 s

D50 = 0.21 mm

Delft Hydraulics

Ribberink and Al Salem (1992)

Intra-wave concentrations measured (with OPCON probe) at three heights in suspension layer

Cycle-mean concentration profiles (power law profiles: straight lines on log-log plot)

Cycle-mean concentration profile

• above plane beds

 simplified form of the Rouse profile:

• vertical profile of cycle-mean concentration <C>

has slope m = 1/2 on log-log plot

•  m has the form of Rouse parameter
• Suspension above rippled beds
• entrainment is dominated by vortex formation and shedding

in a near-bed layer of thickness equivalent to about 2 ripple heights

• effective convective mechanism for transporting sediment

to significantly greater heights than above plane beds

•  vortex shedding becomes important if the ripple steepness

Vortex shedding beneath symmetrical waves

 net transport above ripples depends upon degree of asymmetry in the wave motion

Vortex shedding beneath asymmetrical waves

 vortex shedding gives rise to net transport in direction opposite to that of wave advance (c.f. flat bed case)

Cycle-mean concentration profile above rippled beds

 despite convective nature of the vortex shedding process, mean C-profile is usually modelled using diffusive concepts:

[Upward diffusion + Settling = 0]

< ..> = ‘cycle-mean’

s = sediment diffusivity

s = constant due to

uniformity of vertical

mixing in near-bed layer

above ripples

in which decay scale Lr

is related to ripple height 

Bed forms in oscillatory flow

Parameters involved in ripple formation at low flow stages

Ripples in sinusoidal oscillatory flow are generally

 long-crested

 symmetrical

 regularly spaced with crests transverse to plane of the orbital motion

Ripple development:

 development of initially flat bed as orbital diameter d0increases

 threshold of motion exceeded θ' ≥ 0.045

 first stage of ripple formation initiated

 for small d0, ripple wavelength  d0 e.g

 ripple steepness gradually increases until “vortex” ripples develop with steepness 0.15≤ /λ≤ 0.2

•  flow separates in each wave cycle
• ripples attain a maximum steepness, (/λ )max = 0.2 - 0.22,

and crest angles (up to 120)

Field observations of ripple wavelength

 at very high flow stages (θSF≥ 1), ripples are “washed out” and bed flattens

•  substantial suspended load confined to thin oscillating “sheet flow” layer
• seabed is ‘self regulating’

i.e. transport rates are ‘capped’ beneath large (e.g. storm) waves

• Empirical formulae for ripple prediction : e.g. Nielsen (1992).
• Field observations
• wave-generated ripples are widespread on the continental shelf
• (depths up to 50-100m)
• natural surface waves are irregular

 ripple properties are determined by wave spectrum

• ripple formation may be occasional (i.e. as a result of higher waves)

 ‘fossil’ or ‘relict’ ripples often remain in low wave conditions

Field observations (cont.)

Occurrence of ripples in the field

Threshold of motion is

denoted by M = Mc

M = Mobility number

 maximum ripple wavelengths < those in the laboratory (for same sand size)

 ripples formed by irregular waves are less steep than those formed by regular waves bed roughness is less than expected from laboratory

Morphological modelling (for ripples)

• prediction of evolution of bed as a result of divergence in predicted sediment transport rate, e.g.

Shear stress and transport distribution over surface of a ripple in steady flow

•  maximum bed shear stress (skin friction) occurs just upstream of crest critical condition for ripple growth
•  ripple profile will grow or be eroded locally according to sediment continuity equation :

n = porosity of bed

•  if , then i.e. the bed level rises, and vice versa
•  advection-diffusion of sediment in suspension should also be included in a comprehensive scheme

Wave-current interaction in the seabed boundary layer

•  combined effects of waves and currents represents general situation on continental shelf
•  waves modify the tidal dynamics (i.e. alter mean currents) only in shallow coastal waters (depth h<30m), but potentially affect sediment transport rates over entire shelf
• continuum of conditions arises between earlier limiting cases of

(i) Currents Alone and (ii) Waves Alone:

• STEADY Small Waves Large Waves WAVES
• CURRENT on a  on a 
• ALONE Strong Current Weak Current ALONE

e.g. composite drag coefficients / friction factors necessary for practical purposes:

CD Combined fw

CURRENTS Friction/Drag WAVES

ALONE Coefficient ALONE

 in bottom seabed boundary layer, waves and currents interact nonlinearly,

• e.g. turbulent kinetic energy (T.K.E.) :
• e.g. cycle-mean bed shear stress:
• i.e. waves enhance the current-generated stresses

Cycle-mean velocity profile in W + C flow

Prediction of sediment

• transport rates by W + C
• peak bed shear stress in the

wave cycle is often of central

importance:

•  earlier considerations for currents alone and waves alone remain applicable, with modifications for wave-current interaction
•  roughly speaking, waves stir up the bottom sediment while current transports the sediment

Practical sand transport model TRANSPOR

Van Rijn (1993)

This is a process-based (algebraic not numerical) approach.

Predicted transport rates in perpendicularly combined W + C flow

TRANSPOR has been parameterised to produce the simpler Soulsby-Van Rijn formula (Soulsby, 1997)

Soulsby-Van Rijn formula

(see Soulsby, 1997)

where

with

and

= depth-averaged current

= root-mean-square wave orbital velocity

= drag coefficient due to current alone

= threshold current velocity given by Van Rijn (1984):

for

for

SI units must be used in the above equations

 = slope of bed in streamwise direction, positive if flow runs uphill

h = water depth

d50 = median grain diameter

z0 = bed roughness length = 0.006 m

s = relative density of sediment

g = acceleration due to gravity

 = kinematic viscosity of water

D* = non-dimensional grain diameter

The formula applies to total (bed plus suspended load) transport in combined W+C on horizontal and sloping beds. Term Asb gives the bed load, and term Ass the suspended load transport. The method is intended for conditions in which the bed is rippled, and z0 should be set to 6mm.

It was derived by applying the principles of Grass (1981) who developed one of the first W+C formulations, and it was calibrated against the transport curves plotted by van Rijn (see previous sheet) based on the TRANSPOR program. TRANSPOR itself was calibrated using various field data. The bed slope term (1-1.6tan) is a commonly used device, but is a less correct procedure than modifying the threshold velocity for slope effects.

What governs long-term sediment transport patterns on the continental shelf?

 effect of waves on transport rates on site varies from day to day, and seasonally

 largest contributions to long-term transport are due to fairly large, frequently occurring waves combined with currents lying between mean spring- and neap-maxima

extreme events (e.g. major storms occurring during spring tides) do not dominate long-term transport, as often supposed