outstanding new environmental scientist ones award l.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Outstanding New Environmental Scientist (ONES) Award PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Outstanding New Environmental Scientist (ONES) Award

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 17

Outstanding New Environmental Scientist (ONES) Award - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Outstanding New Environmental Scientist (ONES) Award “ONES” Program Context NIH priority on nurturing and increasing the number of new investigators NIEHS priority on increasing the number of new investigators in environmental health sciences NIH “Pathways” Awards: K99/R00

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Outstanding New Environmental Scientist (ONES) Award' - paul

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
ones program
“ONES” Program
  • Context
    • NIH priority on nurturing and increasing the number of new investigators
    • NIEHS priority on increasing the number of new investigators in environmental health sciences
nih pathways awards k99 r00
NIH “Pathways” Awards: K99/R00
  • Goal: Provide an opportunity for promising postdoctoral scientists to receive both mentored and independent research from the same award

GOAL VI:Recruit and train the next generation of environmental health scientists.Increase recruitment of talented students into environmental health sciences.Engage the broader biomedical community in environmental health

in response niehs has created the outstanding new environmental scientist ones award

In response, NIEHS has created the Outstanding New Environmental Scientist (ONES) Award!

who does this program target
Who does this program target?
  • Highly selective for most talented new scientists
  • Long term commitment to Environmental Health Sciences research
  • < 8 years postdoctoral experience
  • Assistant, Research Asst. Prof.
  • Evidence of independent productivity and facilities
  • No prior R01 support
  • Research oriented towards specific human disease/dysfunction/ pathophysiologic condition or biological process and using environmentally-relevant toxicants
what are the unique features
What are the unique features?
  • Statement of Career Goals
  • Discussion of research experience and achievements
  • External Advisory Committee
  • Institutional Commitment to PI (minimum 80% research time)
  • Separate budget for equipment and career enhancement
what do we mean by commitment to environmental health research
What do we mean by “commitment to environmental health research?”
  • Future Goals and Objectives Section
  • Research focus on human disease, defined impact in environmental health research
  • Minimum 50% commitment
  • Travel to NIEHS for research forums, seminars in years 3-5.
  • Research presentations to meetings with specific EHS focus
what challenges have we faced
What challenges have we faced?
  • We are dealing with new investigators who need lots of “hand-holding” by staff
  • Staff must be consistent in interpretation of eligibility criteria
  • Review is complicated by virtue of the breadth of science proposed
review challenge selection of appropriate reviewers
Review Challenge: Selection of Appropriate Reviewers

Established, broad-thinking scientists (Directors, Deans, MDs and PhDs)

Involved in training and recruitment/ hiring of junior faculty

Committed to understanding and buy-in of goals set forth in the new NIEHS vision

Possessing appropriate scientific expertise for each application

review challenges cont d
Review Challenges, cont’d.
  • Selection of chairperson
  • Orientation of reviewers prior to and at meeting
  • Streamlining
post review interviews
Post-review Interviews
  • 70 applications/61 responsive/28 scored
  • Face-to-face interviews of top 10
    • Interview panel: Members of the National Advisory Council, institute deputy director, scientific director, extramural director, senior intramural and extramural staff
  • Impressions from the interviews
final outcome of review
Final Outcome of Review
  • Council concurrence of all actions
  • 8 of top 10 chosen for funding
  • Meeting of grantees scheduled for October with objective of forming ties with NIEHS leadership, extramural and intramural staff
program areas represented in top 10 applications
Program areas represented in top 10 applications
  • Neuroscience (1)
    • Ion Channel Function in Sensory Neurons
  • DNA Damage and Repair (3)
    • Roles of methyltransferases in DNA Damage Response
    • Telomeric DNA Loss and Repair
    • DNA Translesion sythesis by polymerase eta
  • Carcinogenesis (1)
    • Role of Nrf2 in Arsenic Induced Toxicity
program applications cont d
Program Applications (cont’d)
  • Air Pollution (5)
    • Mortality and Morbidity effects of ozone
    • Mechanisms of Pulmonary Lymphocyte Activation
    • Particulate Matter and Predisposition to Asthma
    • Particulate matter and Thrombosis
    • Role of Diet in Ozone-related Signaling
can ones become an nih wide mechanism
Can “ONES” become an NIH-wide mechanism?
  • Meets objective of creating a mechanism targeted towards helping young investigators with a tenure-track appointment get established
  • Can create a special relationship with an IC that will enhance probability of the PI continuing in the field, especially in areas that need targeting
  • Uses the R01 mechanism with special features
  • Is selective for PIs with high probability of success for competitive renewal
  • Review can be challenging if the scientific areas are very broad
  • CSR study section review would be possible for expertise coverage, but could be problematic in terms of understanding of reviewers of IC objectives/priorities