100 likes | 202 Views
Researching Readers Online. Bronwen Thomas and Julia Round Bournemouth University www.researchingreadersonline.com. AHRC Research Development Award under the Digital Transformations Theme (FEB- JULY 2012) Research question: What impact is digitisation having on reading?
E N D
Researching Readers Online Bronwen Thomas and Julia Round Bournemouth University www.researchingreadersonline.com
AHRC Research Development Award under the Digital Transformations Theme (FEB- JULY 2012) Research question: What impact is digitisation having on reading? • New devices and ease of migrating between them – ereaders, tablets, smartphones etc • Access to other readers (and writers) through online forums and discussion groups What can we learn from this as teachers of literature?
Data available on take up of new devices • Online forums – discussions are archived, threads and themes are highlighted • Access to wide range of readers
METHODS • Online survey of readers • Participant observation of online forums • Focus groups • Interviews • Workshop with academics working with ‘offline’ readers
Findings Online survey Who? • 250 participants • Ages ranged from 16-82 • Mainly professionals, many retirees • Women outnumbered men
Why? • To share ideas and gain new insights • To meet other people • Ability to formulate opinions in writing • Informality and anonymity of forums How? • Print still gold standard for many • Laptops and desktops used more than ereaders or tablets • Digital devices used more for some genres
Focus Group 1: Students Aged 18-30, 5 male, 5 female Use of online sites and digital devices to consume literature and other texts • Ownership predominantly of laptops; none owned an ereader • Romanticist idea of reading: immersive, solitary • Academic reading online versus recreational reading offline • Desire for transmediality rather than duplication when digitising lit Use of online sites and digital devices to comment on literature and other texts • Only half had used forums, although others blogged etc • Mixed experiences on forums: confidence-building; anonymity versus stereotyping; mistrust; hierarchical; encouraging closed-mindedness • Online/simultaneous comment: indicates disengagement; prevents holistic enjoyment of book
Focus Group 2: Professionals and book club members Aged 30-70, 5 male, 3 female The future of reading and the impact of digital devices • Only one person owned an ereader • Disagreement: YP read less, or read ‘different stuff’? • Need for print books to be ‘complementary’ to other media • Hostile reaction to kindle changed during course of discussion • Market dominance concerns • Acknowledgement of romantic image of bookshop • Questions of format and delivery key Activities surrounding reading both online and offline • Only one person had participated in online forums • Online forums were perceived as ‘sinister’ and threatening by the book club members • Intimidation, lack of sincerity, lack of intimacy, lack of energy • Cultural capital of different sites • Professionals were more open to their possibilities
Workshop Participants represented different approaches and methodologies including automated data analysis, historical studies, stylistic analysis and discourse analysis Main discussion points: • Issues of methodology and terminology: e.g. reader as self-selecting category; online groups as interpretive communities; the position of the researcher; the categorisation of readers • The extent to which anything is ‘transformed’: are ideas about the social practice of reading and intimacy/the material form of literature actually reconceptualised online? • Links between devices and content • Concept of ownership • Similarities between on and offline groups
Future Directions • Preference for longitudinal, qualitative methods e.g. following the journey of individual readers via blogs, ongoing interviews etc • Context and dynamics of online discussions crucial • User-generated perceptions of what is considered insightful in reading and interpretation of literature preferable to researchers imposing criteria