1 / 15

Research , innovation, and evaluation, and framing inquiry

Research , innovation, and evaluation, and framing inquiry. Rachel H. Ellaway Community Health Sciences Office of Health and Medical Education Scholarship. Health education is a field. No single theory, method, or approach

Download Presentation

Research , innovation, and evaluation, and framing inquiry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.


Presentation Transcript

  1. Research, innovation, and evaluation, and framing inquiry Rachel H. Ellaway Community Health SciencesOffice of Health and Medical Education Scholarship

  2. Health education is a field • No single theory, method, or approach • A meeting point for multiple concepts, practices, disciplines, perspectives: • Cognitivist - brains • Social constructivist • Systems • Philosophy, values • Practical and pragmatic focus on improving the training of physicians to improve health outcomes

  3. A broad focus • Different levels (individual learning <> whole med-ed systems) • Different issues (what happens, how does it work, how can we improve it, how can we fix it, how do we respond to it …?) • Different values • Nomothetic – generalisable, global • Idiographic – context specific, local • Different philosophies • Measurement, explanation, prediction, generalism … • Strength in this eclecticism – and conflict

  4. Scholarship Boyer’s model: • Scholarship of discovery (research, innovation) • Scholarship of integration (synthesis, cross-domain) • Scholarship of application (effectiveness) • Scholarship of teaching and learning (systematic evaluation and exploration) Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, N.J: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

  5. Quality in scholarship Quality in educational scholarship is reflected in work that is peer-reviewed and publicly disseminated, and that provides a platform that others can build on. [Canadian Association for Medical Education definition - paraphrased]

  6. Scholarly practice • Structured inquiry: • Clear goals • Adequate preparation • Appropriate methods • Significant results • Effective presentation • Reflective critique Glassick CE, Huber MR, Maeroff GI. Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. 1997; San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

  7. What is inquiry? • Develop knowledge, understanding in a focused and structured way • Organizing knowledge • Systematic enquiry • Exploring through experimentation • Testable and predictive models • Many ways to structure inquiry • Depends on assumptions about reality and knowledge

  8. Approaches to inquiry: METRICS Metascholarship Evaluation Translation Research Innovation Conceptual Synthesis

  9. Ontology and epistemology • Ontology – the study of being • What exists, what is real, what do things have in common? • Epistemology – the study of knowledge, truth, belief • e.g. knowing how a car works vs knowing how to drive a car vs knowing how to build a car … • Difference: ‘does this exist?’ is ontology, ‘how can we understand this?’ is an epistemology • Both required in structured inquiry

  10. Example • Ontology: does the [phenomenon] I am interested in really exist? What kind of thing is it? What other things is it like? Can I treat this thing in the same way? • Epistemology: what kinds of knowledge do we already have of this [phenomenon]? What kinds of knowledge do we need? How will we know and what will we know about it from this study/project? • Both have implications for theory and method …

  11. Theory “a set of interrelated constructs, definitions and propositions that presents a systematic view of phenomena by specifying relations among variables, with the purpose of explaining and predicting the phenomena” Theory must be testable – confirmed or rejected consistently Theories are provisional – trajectories towards truth Two intersecting bodies of theory: • Theories of phenomena • Theories of inquiry Kerlinger, F (1970). Foundations of behavioural research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

  12. The process of empiricism • Experience • Classification • Quantification • Discovery of relationships • Approximation to the truth • “the ultimate arbiter is not faith or utility or logic, or even truth, but the empirical world itself” Gorham, p52 Gorham, G (2009) The Philosophy of Science: A Beginner's Guide. Oneworld.

  13. Theory and empiricism • “Theory without experience is empty, but experience without theory is blind” Immanuel Kant • Theory guides our approach to empiricism • Theory explains our empirical findings theory empiricism

  14. Summary • Scholarship sets standards for working in and around HPE • There are different dimensions of scholarship, different kinds of approaches • With training, anyone can adopt a scholarly stance • Inquiry is central to scholarship

  15. Summary • Ontology: what exists, what things are like • Epistemology: what we know, how we know it • Theory: propositions about how the world works • Empiricism: testing or generating knowledge based on real world experience • Theory and empiricism a necessary dyad • Many paradigms

More Related