1 / 34

Conceptual Design Review 4/17/07 Team 1

Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work. Conceptual Design Review 4/17/07 Team 1. John Horst Jared Odle Keith Fay Boyce Dauby. Andrew Kovach Akshay Raje

parley
Download Presentation

Conceptual Design Review 4/17/07 Team 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Conceptual Design Review4/17/07Team 1 • John Horst • Jared Odle • Keith Fay • Boyce Dauby • Andrew Kovach • Akshay Raje • Manish Handa

  2. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work • Mission Statement: • The objective is to provide a fixed-wing, semi-autonomous, long-endurance, continuous-area coverage unmanned aerial vehicle to relay communication of tactical importance for an extended period of time. • Department of Defense • Front-line tactical communication relay to/from warfighter • Relief Agencies/FEMA • Front-line tactical communication relay to/from ground first responders • Commercial Customers • Damaged service locations, scouting of new telecommunication markets, and remote locations

  3. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work • Takeoff • Conventional runway takeoff (Autonomous or Remote Operation) • Distance from Takeoff to Coverage Area • Transmitting/Receiving • Ground Forces  UAV  Command Station or other Ground Forces • Control • Autonomous with manual backup/mission override • Remote Operators • Trained military UAV pilots controlling from Mission Command Center • Level of Threat • Design for high threat environment CONOPS

  4. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work CONOPS http://www.afcea.org/signal/articles/templates/SIGNAL_Article_Template.asp?articleid=507&zoneid=4 • Provide continuous area coverage for and extended time period • Multiple UAVs in system • Redundancy by overlapping coverage • Survivability via electronic countermeasures

  5. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Design Requirements

  6. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Communications Payload • AJCN - Adaptive Joint C4ISR Node by BAE Systems *Volume approximated by avionic density: 0.02 – 0.03 ft3/lb **According to available data

  7. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Additional Payload • Missile Warning/Countermeasures - BAE Systems • AN/ALQ-156(V) Warning System • 425 Watts of Power • 50 pounds • 20.4 × 10.2 × 7.6 in • AN/ALE-47 Dispensing System • Automatic Response • Protects Against: Air Interceptor (AI), Anti-Aircraft Artillery (AAA), and Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAMs) • 20 pounds • Fielded on 1,307 Aircraft • 43.7 x 39.5 x 26.8 in

  8. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Payload Summary MicroPilot - Dayview/Nightview

  9. Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Sizing • Custom written sizing code. • Attempts are being made with FLOPs and ACS—results may be available in the report. • Using General Aviation component weight predictions from Raymer. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07

  10. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Sizing • Various parameters were held constant during trade studies and carpet plot generation

  11. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Trade-offs • Using sizing code, it was determined that increasing the design combat range from 100 to 200 nm resulted in an increase in gross weight of 100 lbs. • Decreasing endurance from 24 hours to 20 hours saved 500 lbs.

  12. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Carpet Plot

  13. Aircraft Description *All dimensions in feet AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07

  14. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Aircraft Description Missile Defense System Avionics Rear Landing Gear Camera Fuel Tanks Main Landing Gear Rotax 914 AJCN

  15. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work 1. Camera 2. AJCN 3. Engine Nacelles 4. Missile Defense 5. Fuel Tanks 6. Avionics 1 2 4 6 3 5 *All dimensions in feet

  16. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Aerodynamics • NACA 652-415 • Thick profile allows easier structural layout • Wide drag bucket @ high lift coefficients • Center at 0.4 • Extends to 0.9 • Aircraft travels entire range as fuel is burned and aircraft lightens

  17. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Aerodynamics • Trailing edge flaps on main wings. • Fowler Flaps • 33% chord ratio • 50% of wing area is covered • Basic drag component buildup using techniques described in Raymer

  18. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Aerodynamics

  19. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Performance

  20. Compliance Matrix AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work

  21. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Propulsion System • Variable pitch propeller • In-flight adjustable • Diameter : 7 ft • Number of blades : 3 • Advance ratio (J) : 0.482 • Activity Factor (AF) : 100 • Integrated design lift coefficient (Cli) : 0.3 • Maximum working RPM : 2400

  22. Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Propulsion System *Cruise velocity: 80 knots *Propeller Efficiency: 0.81 AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07

  23. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Engine Description • Rotax 914 UL Aircraft Engine • 100 HP, with maximum 115 HP for 5 minutes • 4-stroke, 4-cylinder , with turbo charger • Max RPM 5800 • Integrated reduction gear i = 2.4 • Shaft RPM 2400 • Electric starter • Electric dual ignition system

  24. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Material Comparison

  25. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Selected Materials • Internal Structure (wing/tail/body) • Aluminum 2024-T3 • Landing Gear • Aluminum 7075-T6 • Aircraft Skin • Aluminum 7075-T6

  26. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Internal Structure

  27. Weight Breakdown AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work • 1. WCamera • 2. WAJCN • 3. WEngine • 4. WMissile Defense • 5. WMainGear • 6. WWing • 7. WFuselage • 8. WFuel • 9. WAvionics • 10. WVertTail • 11. WHorizTail • 12. WRearGear

  28. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Weight Breakdown *Moment and location measured from tip of the nose

  29. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Stability & Control

  30. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Stability & Control

  31. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Stability & Control

  32. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Control Surface Sizing • Tail Volume Coefficient Method • Vertical tail – 60 ft2 • Horizontal tail – 68 ft2 • Statistical Approximation • Elevator – 22 ft2 • Rudder – 25 ft2 • Aileron – 31 ft2

  33. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Cost • Very hard to estimate per aircraft • DoD Endurance-Payload model  $1.8 million • DoD $1500 / lb empty weight  $3.2 million • DoD $8000 / lb payload  $2.2 million • DAPCA IV model,  $2.7 million (50 aircraft produced) • Average is $2.5 million

  34. AAE 451 - Team 1 - 4/17/07 Introduction Mission Analysis Payload Sizing Aircraft Description Aerodynamics Performance Propulsion Structure Weights Stability & Control Cost Future Work Future Work • Sizing • Update Carpet Plots • More Accurate Results from ACS and FLOPS • Structures • More detailed layout and analysis • Better cost estimate • Stability and Control • Lateral Stability • Control surface sizing • Dynamics • Flight control computer definition • More detailed Aerodynamic work • Potential flow analysis • CFD analysis

More Related