Retrieval of ocean properties
1 / 32

Reflectance curves from the 2002 cruise in Peconic Bay, Long Island - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Retrieval of ocean properties using multispectral methods S. Ahmed, A. Gilerson, B. Gross, F. Moshary Students: J. Zhou, M. Vargas, A. Gill, B. Elmaanaoui, K. Aran.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Reflectance curves from the 2002 cruise in Peconic Bay, Long Island' - paniz

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Retrieval of ocean properties using multispectral methodsS. Ahmed, A. Gilerson, B. Gross, F. Moshary Students: J. Zhou, M. Vargas, A. Gill, B. Elmaanaoui, K. Aran

Spectral Algorithm Development for Sensing of Coastal WatersSeparation of Overlapping Elastic Scattering and Fluorescence from Algae in Seawater through Polarization Discrimination

Reflectance curves from the 2002 cruise in peconic bay long island

Spectral Algorithm Development for Sensing of Coastal Waters

Reflectance curves from the 2002 cruise in Peconic Bay, Long Island

Ratio algorithm performance eastern long island
Ratio algorithm performance –Eastern Long Island

Blue / Green

NIR Spectral Ratio

In homogeneous waters where only Chlorophyll varies Blue / Green works only in Case I (see later) NIR Ratios work well in both Case I and Case II

but may be limited by small signals in open waters

Absorption/Backscatter features

1- Chlorophyll absorption can be probed effectively using 440-570 band ratios

2- In presence of TSS and CDOM, Blue-Green ratios are contaminated.

3- Red-NIR algorithms are much less sensitive to TSS, CDOM.

4- The 670-710 channels effectively probe the ChL absorption feature and the

730 channel effectively calculates the backscatter since water abs dominates



Three Band NIR ratios

Very high spread in the Blue-Green Ratio due to CDOM and TSS randomized

variability. This aspect is not relevant to the Red/NIR algorithms

Multispectral versus hyperspectral assessment of goes r coastal water imager

Future sensors (GOES-R) need to decide between multispectral or hyperspectral mode.

Hyperspectral channels are very important for shallow water retrieval

Preliminary tests compared multispectral vs hyperspectral sensing schemes based on Hydrolight Radiative transfer derived bio-optical model.

Multispectral versus Hyperspectral assessment of GOES-R Coastal Water Imager

Shallow water bio optical model based on hydrolight rt simulations carder et al
Shallow Water Bio-Optical Model multispectral or hyperspectral mode. Based on Hydrolight RT simulations (Carder et al)

Parameterized Shallow Water Model Parameters

Remote Sensing Reflectance Spectra

Inversion error versus measurement noise for all 6 parameters

Normalized Parameter Retrieval Error

Noise (%)

Results parameters

  • Hyperspectral channels are absolutely needed to reduce errors in shallow bottom heights and bottom reflectance (Panels 1 and 5)

  • Ocean column parameters are also much better retrieved using Hyperspectal configuration except for spectral slope of backscatter parameter which makes sense since this parameter caused only broad modification of the reflectance spectra. (Panel 6)

  • Chl retrieval in Productive Case I waters can be obtained by both conventional blue-green type algorithms as well as NIR ratio algorithms

  • TSS and CDOM variability in case II waters makes blue/green ratios useless but three band NIR ratios are very insensitive to these parameters

  • Ratio algorithms for case II waters need thorough testing with in-situ monitoring using a consistent field testing protocol.

  • The effects of atmospheric correction to assess the sensitivity of the various two and three ratio algorithms need to be explored.

  • Development and sensitivity analysis of simultaneous atmosphere /ocean parameter retrieval using both multispectral and hyperspectral algorithms

Separation of Overlapping Elastic Scattering and Fluorescence from Algae in Seawater through Polarization Discrimination

Objective:Separate overlapping fluorescence and elastic scattering spectra of algae excited by white light

Method: Utilize polarization properties of elastically scattered light and unpolarized nature of excited fluorescence to separate the two

Applications: Use fluorescence obtained as indication of Chl concentration even in turbid waters

Obtain elastic scattering spectra free of overlapping fluorescence for ocean color work

Fluorescence height

Fluorescence Height Island


Wavelength, nm




Fluorescence Height

Traditional method of the fluorescence height calculation over baseline

Experimental setup
Experimental Setup Island













L – lens, FP – fiber probe, A – aperture, P1, P2 – polarizers,

C – cuvette with algae, WL – water level.

Objects tested: algae Isochrysis sp.,Tetraselmis striata,

Thalassiosira weissflogii, “Pavlova”, concentrations up to 4x10^6 cells/mL,

algae with clays.

Polarized illumination
Polarized Illumination Island

Near zero if no depolarization valid for spherical particles

Generally validated using laser induced fluorescence but significant

error results due to scattering component

Extracted fluorescence
Extracted Fluorescence Island

Algae Isochrysis sp.

(brown algae spherical d ≈ 5 µm)

Algae Tetraselmis striata

(green algae slightly ellipsoidical d ≈ 12 µm)

Technique with polarized light

Unpolarized source
Unpolarized source Island

Light scattered by the algae illuminated by unpolarized light has some degree of polarization and can be also analyzed using polarization discrimination with

the same linear regression approach

Algae Isochrysis sp.(brown algae spherical d ≈ 5 µm)

Algae with clay
Algae with clay Island

Fluorescence magnitude retrieved from algae with different concentrations of clay

Reflectance curves for algae with clay, Cs = 0 - 200 mg/l

Clay – Na-Montmorillonite, particle size 2-4 µm

Extraction of fluorescence in the waters with rough surface lab experiments
Extraction of fluorescence in the waters with rough surface Island(lab experiments)

Unpolarized light

Probe above the water, probe vertical

No wind

Wind speed above the surface ≈ 9.5 m/s

Sample time increased to 10s from 1s

Algae Isochrysis. Concentration ~4.0 mln cells/ml.

Extraction of fluorescence Islandin the waters of Shinnecock Bay, Long Island

Ratio between 2 polarization components is close to linear

Chl concentration about 8 µg/l

June 2004

Simulation model for case 2 waters
Simulation Model for Case 2 Waters Island


-Backscattering coefficient

-Absorption coefficient

[Mobley, 1994]

-Absorption coefficient of phytoplankton

[Morel, 1991]

-Absorption coefficient of CDOM

[Bricaud, et al., 1981]

-Absorption coefficient of minerals

[Stramski, et al., 2001]


[Morel, 1977]

- Energy of emitted fluorescence

[Gower, et al., 1999]

Simulation model for case 2 waters1
Simulation model for case 2 waters Island


Polarization components of reflectance are calculated from Mie code for 45° illumination (30° in water) & vertical observation

-scattering function at 150°, which was used as average value for calculating backscattering


Polarization components of

were used for calculation of reflectancepolarization components

Half of fluorescence is superimposed on polarization components as a spectrum with Gaussian shape centered at 685 nm

Fluorescence is retrieved using polarization technique

A and B are determined from fitting

outside fluorescence zone

Simulation model results
Simulation Model Results Island

Fluorescence retrieval from reflectance spectra for different concentrations of mineral particles: a) C = 5 mg/m3, b) C = 50 mg/m3.

Results of fluorescence retrieval comparison with baseline method
Results of fluorescence retrieval, comparison with baseline method

Comparison of retrieved fluorescence peak to assumed values for a range of mineral particle concentrations using both polarization discrimination and baseline subtraction

Conclusions future work
Conclusions/Future Work method

  • Separation of Chlorophyll Fluorescence from scattering using polarization discrimination has been demonstrated for 4 types of algae with different shapes, sizes of particles

  • Implementation of the technique using both white light and sun light sources has proven successful in the lab and in the field conditions

  • Fluorescence extraction has been obtained even with the presence of high concentration of scattering medium

  • Validation with laser induced fluorescence has been performed

  • Extraction of fluorescence is successful for all illumination angles with polarized light, up to 50 deg for unpolarized light.

Conclusions future work1
Conclusions/Future Work method

  • Magnitude of fluorescence peak extracted from reflectance spectra through polarization technique does not change with the concentration of scattering medium up to 200 mg/l.

  • Computer simulations show that fluorescence can be successfully retrieved for most water conditions typical for coastal zones with accuracy 7-11%.

  • “Fluorescence height” over baseline strongly overestimates actual and retrieved fluorescence height and these values do not correlate with each other for different concentrations of mineral particles.

  • Future simulations should include effects of multiple scattering and atmosphere on polarization components and fluorescence retrieval process.

Bio optical model 1
Bio-Optical Model 1 method

Due to column and water floor respectively

Bio optical model 2

is the absorption coefficient due to water method

is the absorption coefficient due to gelbstoff

is the backscattering of water

is the backscattering by particulate matters

Bio-Optical Model 2

is the absorption coefficient due to phytoplankton

Bio optical model 3

G method is the gelbstoff absorption at 440nm

taken from tabulated values in Lee et all.

is the phytoplankton absorption coefficient at 400 nm

which varies with the CHLOROPHYLL concentration.

is dependent on

Bio-Optical Model 3

Bio optical model 4
Bio-Optical Model 4 method

Particulate scatter

is the backscattering coefficient of particulates at 440 nm

gives an indication of the size particles.

Water bottom (lambertian)

Using sand based normalized spectral


The parameters in the reflectance model to be retrieved are: