110 likes | 221 Views
This study explores the role of voice mechanisms in local governance across developing countries. It examines how decentralization, participation, and institutionalization shape citizen engagement and government accountability. By analyzing over 50 case studies, including quantitative analysis of 273 municipalities in South Africa, the research categorizes voice mechanisms based on their effect and influence. Factors influencing voice expression are identified, highlighting the need for effective design and implementation of participatory mechanisms to empower citizens and enhance governance outcomes.
E N D
Voice and local governance in the developing world: What is done, to what effect, and why?Matthew Andrews and Anwar Shah
Background • Reform trends: • Decentralization • Participation and empowerment • Institutionalization • Combine them: • Laws requiring decentralized entities to adopt and implement participatory mechanisms into their governance processes
Participation and voice • Voice…an idea from the private to the public sector • We think it is a ‘force’ to help enhance government accountability, performance • How release it? • VOICE MECHANISMS • Elections, public meetings, participatory budget processes, complaint procedures, etc.
Research questions • What is done? What mechanisms are available to facilitate the expression of citizen ‘voice’? • To what effect? What kinds of ‘voice expression’ are evident in different cases where mechanisms have been adopted? • Why? What factors seem to influence voice expression?
Methodology • Literature-based study of over 50 cases where voice mechanisms adopted • Some analyzed in depth • South African study • Quantitative (273 municipalities) • Qualitative (GTZ cases, site visits, emails) • Triangulation
What is done? To what effect? Why? • Many voice mechanisms in place around the world • Conventional categorization • But even within categories many differences • New way of categorization etc. needed
What is done? To what effect? Why? • Categorize voice mechanisms in terms of effect, or type of voice expression… • Two dimensions: 1. Focus: Whose voice is given expression? narrow—broad empowerment— utilitarian continuum 2. Influence: How much influence does the expressed voice(s) carry?
What is done? To what effect? Why? Voice High Influence Narrow focus, Broad focus, High influence High influence Narrow focus, Broad focus, Low influence Low influence Low Narrow Broad Voice focus
What is done? To what effect? Why? • Link to accountability effect • Where low influence: No accountability gains • Where high influence but narrow focus: narrow accountability effect and chance of government capture • Where high influence and broad focus: broad accountability effect, greatest potential for all-around empowerment • Note: Different voice expression effects through voice mechanisms • Question: What factors influence effects?
What is done?To what effect?Why? • The voice mechanism adopted • Mechanisms design details: • mechanism access, ability to participate, the participation agenda, and the approach to assessing participation through the mechanism • Voice transmission mediums • Politics and administrative influence • Socio-economics and social structures
Conclusion • Many voice mechanism types and effects: Few empower broadly (some may have negative effects) • Some factors can be identified as influencing voice expression potential • Note: All governments different (in need for voice expression, in opportunity for voice expression) • Challenge = consider influencing factors and develop voice mechanisms relevant to government needs, opportunities • In default (when led by Bank’s empowerment agenda only): Need to do more to develop voice mechanisms that empower