1 / 12

Developmental Education: Program Components

Developmental Education: Program Components. A Presentation Based on Hunter Boylan’s Work Marilyn Mays and Ruth Dalrymple June 12 – 13, 2003. Mandatory Assessment/Placement. Once an instrument is selected, all involved should take the test

paley
Download Presentation

Developmental Education: Program Components

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Developmental Education: Program Components A Presentation Based on Hunter Boylan’s Work Marilyn Mays and Ruth Dalrymple June 12 – 13, 2003

  2. Mandatory Assessment/Placement • Once an instrument is selected, all involved should take the test • Advisors should read the technical manual. It will help them discuss the instrument with students • No such thing as “mandatory”. Slips happen. • Provide test-taking workshop

  3. Mandatory Assessment/Placement • Allow to students to “challenge” the test • Dev students must register and participate

  4. Systematic Program Evaluation • Design a plan for measurement of program outcomes • Share plan with administrators • Disseminate plan • Complicated statistics not needed • OIRE often have plenty of data; consult them • Provide an executive summary along with the evaluation report

  5. Formative Evaluation for Program Improvement • Share it, review it, analyze it • Include people who have most impact on dev ed. • Obtain baseline date (avg past 3 yrs) • Use students as a source of information • Involve adjuncts in the design and review since they teach a substantial number of the courses

  6. Emphasis on Professional Development • Faculty should identify where they wish to develop their knowledge • Local campus expertise may be available • Share information gained at conferences with collegues • Create professional development library • Include adjunct in activities

  7. Provision of Tutoring • Faculty should recommend tutors • Provide business cards to tutors • Weekend and evenings essential • Pre-service training needed • Pair new tutors with “old” • Diversity of tutors • Contribute to tutor morale • T-shirts, parties, trips,

  8. Involvement in Professional Activities • Local chapters of NADE; CRLA • Associations such as AMATYC, NCTM • Discounts for adjuncts • Faculty should be “rewarded” for participation (tenure, salary, promotion) • Host conferences • Presentations

  9. Adjunct Faculty as a Resource for Dev Ed • Invite adjunct to faculty meetings, socials, activities • Mentor adjuncts • Provide resource manual for adjuncts • Provide readings relevant to teaching dev students • Adjuncts seeking fulltime should be informed of realities of being hired

  10. Student Performance Monitoring by Faculty and Advisors • Create a checklist of potential problems (no textbook, financial aid, etc) • Use contracts for students on academic probation • Helpful for advisors to brief students on academic terms, policies, procedures • Use well-trained peer mentors (CRLA training)

  11. Developmental Philosophy as a Guide to Program Activities • Be oriented to the principles of human development • Program philosophy is a statement of those things that faculty/staff hold to be true about students, teaching, and learning • It incorporates a set of beliefs about dev students and the ways they should be served • Actions of faculty should reflect philosophy

  12. Integration of Classrooms and Laboratories • Coordinate labs when course is designed • Lab use as part of the instructional design process • Instructors should actually review software available and test it themselves • Use lab for testing • Orient adjuncts about labs • Labs should be near classes • Labs supplement instruction; not replicate it • Lab expectations should be written in syllabus

More Related