1 / 10

Contrasting Emphases

This study explores the contrasting emphases of LMU and CMU regarding steadiness and responsiveness. It delves into the unsteady dynamics within specified zones, focusing on how beliefs can be maximized up to a threshold of acceptance. By examining the implications of 'unsteady-ectomy' and the concept of Gettier-proof beliefs, we seek to provide a nuanced understanding of non-tracking zones and their significance in doxastic design. This analysis aims to shed light on how these frameworks influence belief formulation and acceptance in philosophical contexts.

palani
Download Presentation

Contrasting Emphases

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Contrasting Emphases steady LMU CMU responsive

  2. CMU Unsteadiness Zones Nobody A Havit Somebody Nogot

  3. Unsteady-ectomy Nobody A Havit Somebody Nogot

  4. Maximize Acceptance Up to Threshold Nobody A Havit Somebody Nogot

  5. = LMU Rule Nobody A Havit Somebody Nogot

  6. Gettier-proof Belief Nobody A Havit Somebody Nogot

  7. LMU Non-Tracking A C A B A, B, C B C

  8. LMU Non-tracking Zones A B C

  9. CMU Non-steadiness Zones A B C

  10. Doxastic Design Awards 2012 Steadiness LMU Responsive-ness CMU

More Related