1 / 64

Data Collection guide

2014 Electric T&D Benchmarking. Data Collection guide. Updated versions of the Guidelines and recordings from the webinars are available at our website. www.1qconsulting.com :: Benchmarking Community :: Data Entry Gateway. Introduction. Purpose of this document

ova
Download Presentation

Data Collection guide

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2014 Electric T&D Benchmarking Data Collection guide Updated versions of the Guidelines and recordings from the webinars are available at our website. www.1qconsulting.com :: Benchmarking Community :: Data Entry Gateway

  2. Introduction • Purpose of this document • The purpose of this Data Collection Guide is to provide guidance and direction in how to complete the detailed questionnaire for the T&D benchmark study. It gives instructions regarding the types of answers expected, as well as errors to avoid. This Guide has been described as the “rules” for providing data. • It provides the underlying process models around which the various sections of the questionnaire are organized, to help in understanding the purpose of some of the questions. • The appropriate costs to include, and those to exclude, are highlighted, so that each member utility can provide accurate, comparable data for comparisons. • A few key definitions are provided throughout the document. A comprehensive set of definitions is provided in a separate Glossary.

  3. The purpose of this Data Collection Guide is to describe the “rules” for providing data. The organization follows the questionnaire outline: ST. Statistics SA. System Activity DF. Distribution Financial TF. Transmission Financial CP. Capital Project & Portfolio Management SF. Safety SO. Staffing/Outsourcing SU. Support DR. Distribution Reliability SR. Substation Reliability TR. Transmission Line Reliability RP: Storm Response DP. Distribution Practices (Parts 1 and 2) SP. Substation Practices TP. Transmission Line Practices Data Collection Guide Outline

  4. Each year, the core subjects are investigated through the survey: Core Areas to Survey Annually See Guidelines for detailed definition of terms

  5. A Process Model for Managing the Network We have begun structuring the benchmark survey around a process model for managing the energy delivery network. This appears in the cost model and in the practices areas of the questionnaire. Respond to Emergencies Add New Customers Sustain Network Expand Network Operate Network Project/Portfolio Management Develop and Approve Asset Plans Develop Network Strategy

  6. Example Results Statistical Report and Analysis

  7. Example Metrics Comparisons – Distribution cost This page is one of many in the statistical report. The basic format includes the graph, showing relative position of each company, a listing of the mean and quartile values, any comments needed to clarify the graph, and the calculation used for the graph.

  8. Example Functional Area Cost Comparison • For each major subject area, there are cost and service level metrics. Costs are provided per customer and per unit. Service levels depend on the specific subject area.

  9. Example Demographic Comparison • A variety of demographic variables are tracked, to enable analysis of performance based on company demographics

  10. Organization/Operational Practice Example • Operational and organizational practices were tracked and summarized in a variety of different ways, helping companies to understand their practices in relation to other companies in the community.

  11. Example Open-Ended Question Responses Many areas of the questionnaire focus on practices and initiatives, with the goal of getting concise but descriptive responses.

  12. Example Summary from Insights Conference • Various findings from the survey program are assembled for discussion during the Insights conference. • These typically focus on practices and demographics among the companies in the community

  13. Statistics and System Activity

  14. Purpose of the Section • The purpose of this section of the questionnaireire is twofold: to gather statistical information about the existing electric system, and then to gather further information about activities during the year that affect the system and the company. • The statistical section gathers a variety of demographic information that describes each company's system in terms of size, voltage, customer density, etc. This information is used in doing analysis of the results, understanding the inherent advantages and limitations of the circumstances facing each utility. • The system activity portion of the questionnaire is designed to identify work load drivers associated with activity. There are a variety of questions designed to understand the amount of capital activity as well as things that are done for O&M.

  15. Transmission versus Distribution • For purposes of this survey, we define distribution to be a voltage level of 45kV and below. The distinction is somewhat arbitrary, but picks a point between 69kv which is generally considered a transmission (or at least sub-transmission) level and 21kV which would generally be considered distribution. • It is unrealistic to ask utilities to redefine their cost or reliability reporting on the basis of these definitions. However, a utility that has very different definitions may want to restate these statistics to better compare their performance. • Distribution Voltage Classes • 5kV class (>1kV, <=9kV) • 15kV class (>9kV, <=15kV) • 25kV class (>15kV to <=26kV) • 35kV class (>26kV to <=36kV) • 44kV class (>36kV to <=44kV) Transmission classes >=45kV • <69kV class (>=45kV <69kV) • 69kV class (>=69kV <100kV) • 100kV class (>=100kV <200kV) • 200kV Class (>=200kV <300kV) • 300kV Class (>=300 kV <400 kV) • 400kV and above

  16. FERC provides definitions on what constitutes a Transmission vs. Distribution substation based upon use. For multipurpose substations, FERC allows either segregating costs, or assigning based upon predominant use. For purposes of this survey, we generally will recommend a low side definition based upon a 45kV or below as a distribution substation. We understand that a typical Canadian practice would be to define a substation based upon high side voltage (e.g. 115kv to 12kv stations are defined as transmission). Based upon predominant use, these still can be classified as transmission substations. It is unrealistic to ask utilities to redefine their cost or reliability reporting on the basis of these definitions. We will rely on each utility’s self-assigned definitions. However, a utility that has very different definitions may want to restate these statistics to better compare their performance. Substation Definitions • Transmission Voltage Classes: • <69kV • 69kV class (>=69kV <100kV) • 100kV class (>=100kV <200kV) • 200kV Class (>=200kV <300kV) • 300kV Class (>=300kV <400kV) • 400kV and above • Distribution Voltage Classes: • 5kV (>1kV, <=9kV) • 15kV (>9kV, <=15kV) • 25kV (>15kV, <=26kV) • 35kV (>26kV, <=36kV) • 44kV )>36kV, <=48kV) Note: We will have transmission-only and distribution-only entities participating in this survey. Undoubtedly their voltage levels will not necessarily line-up with the above definitions.

  17. Because our benchmarking is done at a relatively high level, we want to include transmission substations that have auto-transformers, but not AC/DC converter stations. While these components aren’t all directly measurable, nor are the MVA calculations comparable, we want to recognize the existence of these units of property to make the benchmarking as comparable as possible. Customer-owned or dedicated substations are an issue in making comparisons. If customers own and maintain their own stations, the reporting option for this questionnaire is clear – please exclude both the O&M costs and the capacity for those stations.. In the event that you maintain one or more customer-owned stations, the answer may be different. The preferred approach to responding to this portion of the questionnaire is to exclude the costs of the customer-owned stations, and exclude the capacity as well. However, if you cannot practically exclude them, then be sure that both the O&M costs and the capacity are included in all your answers. Small, pole-mounted mini-substations (e.g. transformers, protective devices and a switch) should not be counted as substations. Substation Definitions (cont.)

  18. Generally speaking, we want to measure transformers by MVA rating at normal operating conditions. Since utilities have different operating conditions and different manufacturers have different ratings, we will rely on each utility to report their own conditions. Use the number you report in FERC Form 1. We recognize that autotransformers may have a different set of conditions and that the comparison is imprecise, however, we think this is a better solution than leaving them out entirely. Substation Transformer Nameplate rating

  19. System Activity Questions • The purpose of this section is to identify work load drivers associated with activity. We ask for capital unit additions and selected O&M activities for the year. The goal is to understand the major drivers of work, not to capture all of the individual work activities. • The questions are separated into Distribution Lines, Substations, and Transmission Lines

  20. Financial – Overview of the Cost Model Working with an adjusted FERC model and the Activity-Based Cost Model

  21. Financial Section Overview • The Financial sections of the questionnaire (Sections DF and TF) ask for the costs of running the business, separated into Capital and O&M costs. We also further ask companies to allocate costs to Substations. There are two alternative cost reporting systems: • FERC: The overall cost model is based on the FERC system of accounts, with a number of adjustments designed to make the cost reporting more consistent between the companies. Specific questions within the questionnaire ask for the data reported in individual FERC accounts, and then subsequent questions ask for the information required to make the desired adjustments. • ACTIVITY-BASED: The guiding principle of the activity cost model is to capture the expenditures associated with the year in which they were made, regardless of when they were actually reported to FERC. The activities also are more aligned with typical budgetary categories, such as New Business (capital) and Vegetation Management (O&M). While budget categories differ among utilities, we have developed a set of budget categories that most companies have been able to use. • The Financial Section also covers assets reported to FERC, separated by Distribution and Transmission. We also ask companies to allocate assets between lines and substations. Construction Work In Progress (CWIP) is also covered in this section.

  22. FERC: Specific Adjustments • The following page is a schematic of how basic FERC cost data will be adjusted for this benchmarking study. • A&G costs will be excluded – Utilities are asked to adjust their costs to exclude costs typically reported as A&G (e.g. pensions and benefits) from their O&M data. • General plant costs will be excluded – Utilities are asked to adjust their costs to exclude costs typically reported as General Plant (e.g. IT/Communications infrastructure) from their T&D Capital data. • Other T&D Capital exclusions: • Transmission: Land acquisitions and extraordinary items • Distribution: Land acquisitions, street lighting and extraordinary items • Other O&M exclusions: • Transmission: Wheeling, Rents/Leases, IT costs, extraordinary items. If you charge IT support to account 569, you should exclude it. Regional Market Expenses (Accts 575, 576). • Distribution: Streetlight Maintenance, Rents/Leases, IT costs, extraordinary items. If you charge IT support to Distribution O&M accounts, you should exclude it. • If you normally charge R&D, such as EPRI dues, to O&M, include it, unless it is an unusually large amount for this year • Substation costs will be allocated from Transmission and Distribution accounts, and similar adjustments made. • The goal of the exclusions is to provide a fairer comparison of T&D operational performance, by excluding certain costs that relate to demographic differences not under the control of T&D management.

  23. FERC: The ADJUSTED FERC COST MODEL FERC provides a general framework • Certain costs must be excluded to provide fair comparisons that focus on operations • Substation costs must be separated out, including certain allocations Substations

  24. Do not include land acquisition costs or rents/leases. Although less common for distribution, land acquisition costs vary greatly by region and also can occur at very different points in time, based upon land policies. Similarly, rents/leases are an alternative to ownership and have some of the same shortcomings from a benchmarking perspective. Do not include street lighting capital or expense costs. There is a large variation of what street lighting exists in a service territory and what percent is owned and operated by the incumbent utility. Do not include extraordinary items. These can run the gamut and should be identified individually. Storm costs should be excluded if they are outside your “normal” experience. This is to account for the fact that some utilities utilize an “insurance reserve”, so that extraordinary storm expenses are charged to the “reserve” account, and are not “O&M” expenses. If your utility uses an “insurance reserve” account, you do not need to make any adjustment. FERC: Rationale for Exclusions - Distribution

  25. If you have O&M expenses for which you are reimbursed, such as maintenance done for customers, do not include them. Do not include land acquisition costs or rents/leases. Land acquisition costs vary greatly by region and also can occur at very different points in time, based upon land policies. Similarly, rents/leases are an alternative to ownership and have some of the same shortcomings from a benchmarking perspective. Do not include wheeling expenses. Generally, the transmission metrics are geared to operational performance of the infrastructure. So while an argument could be made that wheeling is a substitute for system ownership, it may also be simply an economic arrangement to purchase incremental or low-cost power. Do not include extraordinary items. These can run the gamut and should be identified individually. Storm costs should be excluded if they are outside your “normal” experience. This is to account for the fact that some utilities utilize an “insurance reserve”, so that extraordinary storm expenses are charged to the “reserve” account, and are not “O&M” expenses. If your utility uses an “insurance reserve” account, you do not need to make any adjustment. FERC: Rationale for Exclusions - Transmission

  26. Do not include land acquisition costs or rents/leases. Land acquisition costs vary greatly by region and also can occur at very different points in time, based upon land policies. Similarly, rents/leases are an alternative to ownership and have some of the same shortcomings from a benchmarking perspective. Do not include extraordinary items. These can run the gamut and should be identified individually. Storm costs should be excluded if they are outside your “normal” experience. This is to account for the fact that some utilities utilize an “insurance reserve”, so that extraordinary storm expenses are charged to the “reserve” account, and are not “O&M” expenses. If your utility uses an “insurance reserve” account, you do not need to make any adjustment. FERC: Rationale for Exclusions - Substation

  27. FERC: CIAC • 2. Electric Plant To Be Recorded at Cost. • A. All amounts included in the accounts for electric plant acquired as an operating unit or system, except as otherwise provided in the texts of the intangible plant accounts, shall be stated at the cost incurred by the person who first devoted the property to utility service. All other electric plant shall be included in the accounts at the cost incurred by the utility, except for property acquired by lease which qualifies as capital lease property under General Instruction 19. Criteria for Classifying Leases, and is recorded in Account 101.1, Property under Capital Leases, or Account 120.6, Nuclear Fuel under Capital Leases. Where the term cost is used in the detailed plant accounts, it shall have the meaning stated in this paragraph. • B. When the consideration given for property is other than cash, the value of such consideration shall be determined on a cash basis (see, however, definition 9). In the entry recording such transition, the actual consideration shall be described with sufficient particularity to identify it. The utility shall be prepared to furnish the Commission the particulars of its determination of the cash value of the consideration if other than cash. • C. When property is purchased under a plan involving deferred payments, no charge shall be made to the electric plant accounts for interest, insurance, or other expenditures occasioned solely by such form of payment. • D. The electric plant accounts shall not include the cost or other value of electric plant contributed to the company. Contributions in the form of money or its equivalent toward the construction of electric plant shall be credited to accounts charged with the cost of such construction. Plant constructed from contributions of cash or its equivalent shall be shown as a reduction to gross plant constructed when assembling cost data in work orders for posting to plant ledgers of accounts. The accumulated gross costs of plant accumulated in the work order shall be recorded as a debit in the plant ledger of accounts along with the related amount of contributions concurrently be recorded as a credit. • The actual expenditures, on the other hand, may or may not be net, depending on how the company accounting works.  When the company issues an invoice for the contribution, it should credit to the plant accounts when the invoice is issued, whether or not the invoice is ever collected, so the actual expenditures should also be net, unless they don’t issue the invoice timely.  I believe that the way most companies do it, and the prudent business practice, would be to issue the invoice, and maybe collect it, before construction begins.

  28. FERC: Distribution Capital Adjustments • Each portion of the financial section asks for the key FERC accounts, and then asks for the information necessary to make the adjustments. In the figure below (taken directly from the questionnaire), the blue arrow highlights the value to insert for the exclusion, if it isn't already clear. As noted on the preceding page, FERC costs are net of CIAC.

  29. FERC: Distribution O&M Adjustments • For Distribution Line O&M expenses, the Substations expenses need to be removed from the overall Distribution expenses (shown with the blue arrow). Then individual exclusions are identified as well.

  30. FERC: Transmission Capital Adjustments • Each portion of the financial section asks for the key FERC accounts, and then asks for the information necessary to make the adjustments. In the figure below (taken directly from the questionnaire), the blue arrow highlights the value to insert for the exclusion, if it isn't already clear. As noted on page 25, the FERC costs are net of CIAC.

  31. FERC: Transmission O&M Adjustments • For Transmission Line O&M expenses, the Substations expenses need to be removed from the overall Transmission expenses (shown with the blue arrow). Then individual exclusions are identified as well.

  32. ACTIVITY-BASED Cost Model • While FERC has the benefit of being a uniform system of accounts, there are several important shortcomings: • FERC capital spending lags behind actual spending; costs for large projects go into a Construction Work in Progress (CWIP) account and are not transferred until the assets are placed into service, sometimes a several year lag. • FERC capital accounts generally follow plant accounts and units of property (e.g. poles, towers, and fixtures) – not the typical reasons why utilities spend (e.g. new business) • FERC O&M accounts tend to be more activity-oriented, but do not necessarily track important categories (e.g. vegetation management) • For those reasons, a simplified Activity-Based Costing system was developed to get current year spending by activity. The following diagram depicts the Activity-Based approach

  33. Activity-Based Cost Model • The activity-based cost model breaks the expenditures into capital and O&M, and then splits them into the activities shown on the process model introduced above. The following 3 pages provide more details of the individual activities for Transmission, Substations, and Distribution. • Transmission Line Capital • Serve New • Expand • Sustain • Other • CIAC • T&D Substation Capital • Serve New • Expand • Sustain • Other • CIAC • Distribution Line Capital • Serve New • Expand • Sustain • Other • CIAC • Transmission Line O&M • Sustain the Network • Operate the Network • T&D Substation O&M • Sustain the Network • Operate the Network • Other • Distribution Line O&M • Sustain • Other

  34. Activity Based Costs – Transmission Lines • While capital expenditures are split among several different processes from the overall process model, O&M expenses are almost entirely associated with sustaining the network. • Transmission Line Capital • Serve New: Extension to new customers or utility substations [Industrial/Generation/Wholesale] • Expand: Capacity Additions (Adding additional lines to existing substations, increasing capacity of existing lines) • Sustain: Replace/Repair in kind • Sustain: system improvements (reliability/efficiency) • Sustain: Service Restoration • Sustain: Line Relocations • Sustain: Transmission Operations Center • Sustain: Asset Retirement Costs for Transmission Plant (FERC 359.1) • Other • CIAC • Transmission Line O&M • Inspection and Maintenance Expense (except 569.1-4) • ROW/Vegetation Management • Service Restoration • Transmission Operations Center • Engineering/Design O&M (including FERC 561.5-8) • Other

  35. Activity Based Costs - Substations • While capital expenditures are split among several different processes from the overall process model, O&M expenses are almost entirely associated with sustaining the network. • T&D Substation Capital • Serve New: New Substations and new substation capacity to serve specific new customer requests • Expand: Capacity Additions to meet generic load growth • Sustain: Repair/replace-in-kind • Sustain: system improvement (reliability/efficiency, system hardening, physical security) • Sustain: Service Restoration • Sustain: Mobile/Spare Transformer Purchases • Other • CIAC • T&D Substation O&M • Inspection & Maintenance • Service Restoration • Distribution Operations Center • Engineering/Design O&M (Planning studies, standards, mapping) • Other

  36. Activity Based Costs – Distribution Lines • Almost all of O&M is considered to be work designed to “sustain the network” or “operate the network”. • Capital work is split among adding new customers, expanding the system, and sustaining the network • Distribution Line Capital • Serve New: Extension to new distribution customers • Expand: Capacity Additions (adding additional lines, increasing capacity of existing lines) • Sustain: System improvement (reliability/efficiency including distribution automation, feeder hardening, worst circuits, etc.) • Sustain: Replace/Repair in kind (not including meters & transformers) • Sustain: Service Restoration • Sustain: Line Relocations • Sustain: Distribution Operations Center • Sustain: Meter Purchases (including AMS investment) • Sustain: Transformer Purchases • Other • CIAC • Distribution Line O&M • Inspection & Maintenance (planned or unplanned not associated with service restoration) • Vegetation Management • Service Restoration • Distribution Operations Center • O&M associated with capital work • Engineering/Design O&M (Planning studies, standards, mapping) • Damage Prevention/Facility Locating • Field Switching • Meter Expenses (O&M) • Transformer Expenses (O&M) • Other

  37. Activity-Based: Distribution Capital Activities • In order to better understand your capital spending, we ask that the capital figures be allocated in accordance with a specified list of activities. • The total capital activity is intended to be the amount actually spent during the year, not necessarily what was reported to FERC (and not necessarily the “adjusted FERC capital” reported in this survey); we believe that this eliminates some of the perturbations caused by changes in CWIP accounts.

  38. Activity-Based: Distribution O&M • As is done with Capital, we ask that the O&M figures be allocated in accordance with a specified list of activities. • Unlike Capital, we expect the O&M Expense should equal the amount reported as “Adjusted FERC”

  39. Activity-Based: Transmission Capital • In order to better understand your capital spending, we ask that the capital figures be allocated in accordance with a specified list of activities. • The total capital activity is intended to be the amount actually spent during the year, not necessarily what was reported to FERC (and not necessarily the “adjusted FERC capital” reported in this survey); we believe that this eliminates some of the perturbations caused by changes in CWIP accounts.

  40. Activity-Based: Transmission O&M • As is done with Capital, we ask that the O&M figures be allocated in accordance with a specified list of activities. • Unlike Capital, we expect the O&M Expense should equal the amount reported as “Adjusted FERC”

  41. Distribution Assets • The last series of questions in the Distribution Financial section asks about the FERC account values for the existing assets. These values are needed in order to determine asset replacement rates

  42. Transmission Assets • The last series of questions in the Transmission Financial section asks about the FERC account values for the existing assets. These values are needed in order to determine asset replacement rates

  43. Safety, Staffing & Support

  44. Most of the statistics come directly from OSHA definitions (see www. OSHA.gov) There are, however, some safety reporting issues: Vehicular accidents – Most utilities report all reportable accidents, whether preventable or not and regardless of fault. In general, we want utilities to include personal vehicles when used on company business. There are some differences in how utilities treat limited duty work, which will not be resolved as part of this benchmarking. The “DART” (Days Away, Restricted or Transferred) rate is a standard OSHA statistic. The OSHA definition is included in the Glossary. Safety Reporting

  45. Safety Question • We’re asking for raw data directly off your OSHA form for the safety stats. Within the question we calculate the safety rates we’ll be using on the performance profiles and in the report. We will also calculate these as part of the report. When on-line you may want to enter the calculated data in the appropriate fields so that both the on-line version and excel version match.

  46. Staffing FTE: Count all company employees assigned full time to a function, including direct labor, supervision, administrative support and technical support Add in partial counts for part-time employees (seasonal employees or employees who work less than 40 hours per week) and for full-time employees who split their time across different functions When calculating FTE value use 2080 hours per year as the denominator. 50% guideline: Include a person in a function if they spend at least 50% of their time on that function. If a person divides their time so that they don't spend 50% on any single function, count them in the “Other” category. Outsourcing Percentages: Estimate and report the percent of the total direct labor work for each functional area that was performed by contractors rather than company employees. You may use different methods to estimate these outsourcing percentages such as % of total labor hours, % of total miles built, etc.. There are text questions in the survey that ask you to identify the method(s) used. Staffing

  47. Support • Inventory: • Provide the portion of the value reported in FERC Account 154, "Plant Materials and Operating Supplies", FERC Form 1, Page 110, line 48, column C, allocated by function as below • We ask for Normal Inventory (Omitting storm stock, spares, power transformers, regulators, reclosers from inventory value) and Storm Stock and Major Construction Stock. Normal inventory is the key measure we are looking for. • For our purposes, a “storeroom” is a facility where inventory materials are normally kept for charge-out and use by construction and maintenance forces. • Fleet • We have just selected a few key measures for Fleet. This section is not intended to cover the entire fleet operations area • Vehicle counts should include both company owned and leased vehicles

  48. Reliability

  49. Statistics IEEE Standard 1366 has become the major guide for definitions on distribution reliability. Though not every utility follows it exactly, some of the key issues identified by this standard include: Outage duration to be considered an interruption Definition of a major event (2.5 Beta Method) IEEE 1366-2012 can be purchased for download at: http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/1366-2012.html There are still some reporting differences among utilities in terms of the following: Step restoration reporting Level of reporting (are single services included) Accuracy of estimates We will also calculate “mileage adjusted” SAIDI and SAIFI values, as well as CEMIx values (adjusted for each integer level) Distribution Reliability

  50. Distribution Reliability (cont) • Worst Circuit Performance • Many jurisdictions have introduced “worst circuit performance” measures. We have asked questions around typical measures (e.g.“bottom 10%”), but do not cover all the possible variations. • We also ask a few questions to highlight some of the adjustments to these measures (in particular low customer counts might skew the measures). • Outage Management System • We ask about OMS systems and features, along with enhancements utilities are investing in to improve the restoration processes • Reliability Improvement Initiatives • Please take the time to provide brief but complete answers to recent improvement initiatives that you have undertaken • Estimated Restoration Times • Customer research shows ERT’s are very important and that most utilities are providing them under normal circumstances; please provide information on your experience with ERTs, both under normal conditions and in storm situations. • Emergency Response Time

More Related