230 likes | 329 Views
Explore ocean modeling with focus on nonlinear systems, data assimilation for resolving physical questions, and the effectiveness of dynamical systems and variational methods in predicting ocean behavior amidst noise.
E N D
Analysis and Prediction of a Noisy Nonlinear Ocean With: L. Ehret, M. Maltrud, J. McClean, and G. Vernieres
Modeling and Analysis • Ocean models predict the evolution of the ocean from approximate initial conditions according to incompletely resolved dynamics forced by approximate inputs. • We treat noise according to the formalism of random processes. • Data assimilation is our best hope for resolving physical questions in terms of models and data • Most data assimilation schemes are based on linearized theory
TheDynamicalSystems Approach • Linear systems are characterized by their steady solutions and stability characteristics... • But the ocean is nonlinear, and nonlinear systems may have multiple stable solutions • Stable solutions may not be steady • Stability characteristics tell you about essential local behavior.
Example: The Kuroshio • The Kuroshio exhibits multiple states. Is it • A system with multiple equilibria? • A complex nonlinear oscillator? • Both? Neither? • Many plausible models give output that resembles the observations. • We show results from a QG model and a 1/10 degree PE model (J. McClean, M. Maltrud) • Use a variational method to assimilate satellite data (G. Vernieres) • Dynamical systems techniques and data assimilation will help us decide among models
Fine Resolution Model • 1/10o North Pacific model • Courtesy J. McClean & M. Maltrud
2-Level QG Model • 2-layer QG model on curvilinear grid • Assimilate SSH data at one point at three times • Strong constraint: adjust initial condition only • First guess contains a transition • Use representer method
Typical steady states of the Kuroshio (adapted from Kawabe, 1995)
Typical steady states of the Kuroshio (adapted from Kawabe, 1995) nNLM: nearshore non large meander ssh [cm] and geostrophic velocities [m/s] (AVISO merged TOPEX/POSEIDON products)
Typical steady states of the Kuroshio (adapted from Kawabe, 1995) oNLM: offshore non large meander
Typical steady states of the Kuroshio (adapted from Kawabe, 1995) tLM: typical large meander ssh [cm] and geostrophic velocities [m/s] (AVISO merged TOPEX/POSEIDON products)
Contours of ssh nNLM LM nNLM tLM
Contours of ssh nNLM LM Unstable nNLM tLM
Contours of ssh nNLM LM Stable nNLM tLM
Qualitative comparison with satellite data ~4.0km/day
Qualitative comparison with satellite data ~4.0km/day ~4.0 km/day
Qualitative comparison with satellite data ~ 800km ~ 800 km
3 data points for the assimilation!
Data / Forward model We want to assimilate ssh data that spans the last transition from the nNLM to the tLM state
Summary • Model nonlinear systems can behave as real world noisy nonlinear systems • Simplified systems share enough with detailed models, and both resemble observations sufficiently to make comparisons useful • Consequences of applying linearized techniques to intrinsically nonlinear systems are yet to be explored